Abstract:Statement of problem. Intraoral scanning has benefits over conventional impression making, but whether scanning is sufficiently accurate for multiple implants is unclear.Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the trueness of digital scans acquired by using intraoral scanners from a small range to a complete arch with the conventional impression technique and to determine the influence of 2 different evaluation methods (best -fit algorithm versus absolute linear deviation) on the outcomes of accuracy assessment.Material and methods. A mandibular model with 8 implants (A-H) around an edentulous arch was used as the master model. Open-format standard tessellation language (STL) data sets (1 reference file from a highly accurate dental laboratory scanner, 10 files from an intraoral scanner, and 10 files from digitized conventional impressions at room temperature) were imported to a metrology software program, and 5 groups of scanning ranges (AB, FGH, CDEF, BCDEFG, and ABCDEFGH) were identified simulating different clinical situations. Two evaluation methods -root mean square values calculated from the best -fit algorithm and average value of linear discrepancies from absolute linear deviation -were used to describe the trueness values. The impacts of different scanning or impression methods, ranges, and evaluation methods were tested by using a 3-way ANOVA. The effect of the scanning range on accuracy was further identified with 1-way ANOVA. The paired-sample t test was used to determine the differences of trueness values between the 2 methods in different groups.Results. The trueness values of the implant impressions were significantly affected by different scanning or impression methods (P<.001), evaluation methods (P<.001), and scanning ranges (P<.001) as independent variables. With use of the best -fit algorithm, deviations from the digital scans were significantly greater than those from the conventional impressions in cross -arch situations (groups CDEF, BCDEFG, and ABCDEFGH). With use of the absolute linear deviation method, statistically significant lower accuracy was found when larger areas were encountered (groups BCDEFG and ABCDEFGH). Use of the absolute linear deviation method resulted in a higher mean score of inaccuracy than that from the best -fit algorithm method in most situations.Conclusions. Scanning or impression methods, ranges, and evaluation methods affected the dimensional accuracy (trueness) of scans or impressions with multiple implants. Digital scans had worse trueness values compared with those made with the conventional splinting open-tray technique when cross-arch implant impressions were acquired. (J Prosthet Dent 2022;128:1017-23)

Efficient Intraoral Photogrammetry Using Self-Identifying Projective Invariant Marker

Factors Influencing the Accuracy of Intraoral Impression in Implant Restoration

Influence of implant reference on the scanning accuracy of complete arch implant scans captured by using a photogrammetry system

Research progress on accuracy of intraoral digital impressions for implant-supported full-arch prostheses

Accuracy of edentulous full‐arch implant impression: An in vitro comparison between conventional impression, intraoral scan with and without splinting, and photogrammetry

A Method of Multi-View Intraoral 3D Measurement

[Research Progress on Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impressions for Implant-Supported Prostheses in Edentulous Jaw].

A new 3D-method to assess the inter implant dimensions in patients - A pilot study

Accuracy of Digital Implant Impressions Using a Novel Structured Light Scanning System Assisted by a Planar Mirror in the Edentulous Maxilla: an in Vitro Study

Study of scanning repeatability of intraoral digital impressions

A new method for the evaluation of the accuracy of full-arch digital impressions in vitro

Evaluation of the Accuracy of Digital Impression Techniques Based on an Integrated ADA Model

Computer-assisted preoperative planning system with an automated registration method in prosthesis-driven oral implantology

Accuracy of Impressions for Multiple Implants: A Comparative Study of Digital and Conventional Techniques

Accuracy of photogrammetric imaging versus conventional impressions for complete arch implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: A comparative clinical study

Comparison of the Registration Methods for the Three-Dimensional Facial Scans Applied to the Design of Full-Arch Implant Supported Restoration

Comparing the accuracy of full-arch implant impressions using the conventional technique and digital scans with and without prefabricated landmarks in the mandible: An<i> in</i><i> vitro</i> study

Influence Of Different Factors On The Accuracy Of Digital Impressions Of Multiple Implants: An In Vitro Study

Cost-Effective Full-Color 3D Dental Imaging Based on Close-Range Photogrammetry

Precision Test of a Multi-Functional Scan Body for the Scan and Cross-Mount of an Edentulous Arch: A Pilot Case-Control Study

Accuracy of full arch three-dimensional dentition models from intraoral scanners