Abstract:As machine learning (ML) usage becomes more popular in the healthcare sector, there are also increasing concerns about potential biases and risks such as privacy. One countermeasure is to use federated learning (FL) to support collaborative learning without the need for patient data sharing across different organizations. However, the inherent heterogeneity of data distributions among participating FL parties poses challenges for exploring group fairness in FL. While personalization within FL can handle performance degradation caused by data heterogeneity, its influence on group fairness is not fully investigated. Therefore, the primary focus of this study is to rigorously assess the impact of personalized FL on group fairness in the healthcare domain, offering a comprehensive understanding of how personalized FL affects group fairness in clinical outcomes. We conduct an empirical analysis using two prominent real-world Electronic Health Records (EHR) datasets, namely eICU and MIMIC-IV. Our methodology involves a thorough comparison between personalized FL and two baselines: standalone training, where models are developed independently without FL collaboration, and standard FL, which aims to learn a global model via the FedAvg algorithm. We adopt Ditto as our personalized FL approach, which enables each client in FL to develop its own personalized model through multi-task learning. Our assessment is achieved through a series of evaluations, comparing the predictive performance (i.e., AUROC and AUPRC) and fairness gaps (i.e., EOPP, EOD, and DP) of these methods. Personalized FL demonstrates superior predictive accuracy and fairness over standalone training across both datasets. Nevertheless, in comparison with standard FL, personalized FL shows improved predictive accuracy but does not consistently offer better fairness outcomes. For instance, in the 24-h in-hospital mortality prediction task, personalized FL achieves an average EOD of 27.4% across racial groups in the eICU dataset and 47.8% in MIMIC-IV. In comparison, standard FL records a better EOD of 26.2% for eICU and 42.0% for MIMIC-IV, while standalone training yields significantly worse EOD of 69.4% and 54.7% on these datasets, respectively. Our analysis reveals that personalized FL has the potential to enhance fairness in comparison to standalone training, yet it does not consistently ensure fairness improvements compared to standard FL. Our findings also show that while personalization can improve fairness for more biased hospitals (i.e., hospitals having larger fairness gaps in standalone training), it can exacerbate fairness issues for less biased ones. These insights suggest that the integration of personalized FL with additional strategic designs could be key to simultaneously boosting prediction accuracy and reducing fairness disparities. The findings and opportunities outlined in this paper can inform the research agenda for future studies, to overcome the limitations and further advance health equity research.

Unified Fair Federated Learning for Digital Healthcare

A Federated Learning Framework Via Decentralized Data Valuation for Chronic Disease Healthcare

Towards Fair and Privacy Preserving Federated Learning for the Healthcare Domain

Improving Fairness in AI Models on Electronic Health Records: The Case for Federated Learning Methods

A New Perspective to Boost Performance Fairness for Medical Federated Learning

Multi-Dimensional Fair Federated Learning

HQsFL: A Novel Training Strategy for Constructing High-performance and Quantum-safe Federated Learning

Federated Fairness Analytics: Quantifying Fairness in Federated Learning

Contribution-Aware Federated Learning for Smart Healthcare

Unified Group Fairness on Federated Learning

Enforcing Group Fairness in Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning

Post-Processing Fairness Evaluation of Federated Models: An Unsupervised Approach in Healthcare

FedUP: Bridging Fairness and Efficiency in Cross-Silo Federated Learning

Knowledge abstraction and filtering based federated learning over heterogeneous data views in healthcare

Fairness and Privacy in Federated Learning and Their Implications in Healthcare

FairFML: Fair Federated Machine Learning with a Case Study on Reducing Gender Disparities in Cardiac Arrest Outcome Prediction

A Fog-Based Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning System for Smart Healthcare Applications

Federated Uncertainty-Aware Learning for Distributed Hospital EHR Data

Framework for Co-distillation Driven Federated Learning to Address Class Imbalance in Healthcare

Asymmetrical Reciprocity-based Federated Learning for Resolving Disparities in Medical Diagnosis

Analyzing the Impact of Personalization on Fairness in Federated Learning for Healthcare