Abstract:Abstract Melanoma has seen a remarkable improvement in the treatment of advanced disease. However, the majority of patients still relapse with the emergence of resistant disease. This is especially true for BRAF inhibitors, were multiple mechanisms of resistance have been uncovered. However, the lack of dependable models to develop approaches to overcome resistance, poses a real challenge for clinical decisions on second line therapies. In addition, combination therapies necessary to achieve long term responses increase the number of possibilities to be assessed. In this study, we developed patient derived xenograft (PDX) models from BRAF inhibitor resistant patients and, after characterization, tested rational second line combination therapies in co-clinical trials.Fresh tumor tissue from 12 patients after progression on vemurafenib or dabrafenib was implanted into immune deficient NSG mice. Once the tumor grafts were established, mice were continually dosed with PLX4720 to approximate clinical plasma levels to preserve the resistant phenotype. Xenografts were then characterized for genomic alterations and pathway activation status using a targeted sequencing array and a reverse phase protein array, respectively. We found at least 2 and up to 9 known deleterious alterations in all samples, many of which have been described as conferring resistance. The protein array clustered into two major groups: MAPK pathway activated and PI3K pathway activated, again consistent with previous reports. Integrating these data allowed us to design rational combination therapies for in vivo testing. We treated a PDX model with MET amplification and high phospho c-Met with the BRAF inhibitor LGX818 20mg/kg QD, the MEK inhibitor MEK162 3mg/kg QD, and the c-Met inhibitor INC280 25mg/kg QD (all p.o.). Although INC280 alone led to significant decrease in tumor growth, only the LGX818/ MEK162/ INC280 triple combination led to complete and sustained tumor regression in all mice. Further, we tested a second PDX model with a MET amplification (albeit broader and lower) but baseline pMET on the protein level. In this model, INC280 did not show any antitumor effect confirming the specificity for c-Met and the importance of validating genomic data.In summary, using our BRAF inhibitor resistant PDX model pipeline we were not only able to identify actionable alterations in all models, but also to test rational second line combination therapies in pre-clinical in vivo trials. Genomic data alone might not be sufficient to accurately predict therapy responses and protein arrays were a valuable tool to validate deleterious alteration calls. This study represents an important step towards improving personalized medicine in melanoma, and highlights the potential use of c-Met inhibitors in melanoma combination therapy in a defined subset of patients. Citation Format: Clemens Krepler, Min Xiao, Katrin Sproesser, Patricia Brafford, Batool Shannan, Marilda Beqiri, Wei Xu, Bradley Garman, Katherine L. Nathanson, Xiaowei Xu, Giorgos Karakousis, Gordon B. Mills, Yiling Lu, Giordano Caponigro, Markus Boehm, Malte Peters, Lynn Schuchter, Meenhard Herlyn. Personalized pre-clinical trials in BRAF inhibitor resistant patient derived xenograft models of melanoma identify c-Met as an effective second line combination therapy target. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 2842. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-2842

Supplementary Figure S2 from Personalized Preclinical Trials in BRAF Inhibitor–Resistant Patient-Derived Xenograft Models Identify Second-Line Combination Therapies

Supplementary Figure S6 from Personalized Preclinical Trials in BRAF Inhibitor–Resistant Patient-Derived Xenograft Models Identify Second-Line Combination Therapies

Supplementary Figure S5 from Personalized Preclinical Trials in BRAF Inhibitor–Resistant Patient-Derived Xenograft Models Identify Second-Line Combination Therapies

Supplementary Figure S1 from Personalized Preclinical Trials in BRAF Inhibitor–Resistant Patient-Derived Xenograft Models Identify Second-Line Combination Therapies

Supplementary Table S1 and Figure Legends from Personalized Preclinical Trials in BRAF Inhibitor–Resistant Patient-Derived Xenograft Models Identify Second-Line Combination Therapies

Data from Personalized Preclinical Trials in BRAF Inhibitor–Resistant Patient-Derived Xenograft Models Identify Second-Line Combination Therapies

Supplementary Figure 3 from an Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition Gene Signature Predicts Resistance to EGFR and PI3K Inhibitors and Identifies Axl As a Therapeutic Target for Overcoming EGFR Inhibitor Resistance

Supplementary Table 3 from an Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition Gene Signature Predicts Resistance to EGFR and PI3K Inhibitors and Identifies Axl As a Therapeutic Target for Overcoming EGFR Inhibitor Resistance

Abstract 2842: Personalized Pre-Clinical Trials in BRAF Inhibitor Resistant Patient Derived Xenograft Models of Melanoma Identify C-Met As an Effective Second Line Combination Therapy Target

Assessment of a Novel VEGF Targeted Agent Using Patient-Derived Tumor Tissue Xenograft Models of Colon Carcinoma with Lymphatic and Hepatic Metastases

Preclinical Activity Of The Rational Combination Of Apatinib In Combination With Cpt-11 In Kras-Mutant Colorectal Cancer Patient-Derived Xenograft Model

Supplementary Figure 4 from Personalized Chemotherapy Profiling Using Cancer Cell Lines from Selectable Mice

Patient Derived Xenograft (Pdx) Of Human Melanoma To Predict Clinical Responses

Preclinical Study of a Combination of Erlotinib and Bevacizumab in Early Stages of Unselected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patient-Derived Xenografts

Abstract A01: A comprehensive collection of patient derived xenografts of human melanoma with clinical, genomic, and biological characterization

Figure S1 from Use of <i>ex</i> <i>vivo</i> Patient-Derived Tumor Organotypic Spheroids to Identify Combination Therapies for <i>her2</i> Mutant Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

A Comprehensive Patient-Derived Xenograft Collection Representing the Heterogeneity of Melanoma.

Supplementary Figure 6 from Personalized Chemotherapy Profiling Using Cancer Cell Lines from Selectable Mice

Supplementary Figure 9 from Personalized Chemotherapy Profiling Using Cancer Cell Lines from Selectable Mice

Supplementary Figure S2 from Comutations and KRAS<sup>G12C</sup> Inhibitor Efficacy in Advanced NSCLC

Supplementary Figure 5 from PI3K/mTOR Inhibitor PF-04691502 Antitumor Activity is Enhanced with Induction of Wild-Type TP53 in Human Xenograft and Murine Knockout Models of Head and Neck Cancer