Abstract:In many human movement studies angle-time series data on several groups of individuals are measured. Current methods to compare groups include comparisons of the mean value in each group or use multivariate techniques such as principal components analysis and perform tests on the principal component scores. Such methods have been useful, though discard a large amount of information. Functional data analysis (FDA) is an emerging statistical analysis technique in human movement research which treats the angle-time series data as a function rather than a series of discrete measurements. This approach retains all of the information in the data. Functional principal components analysis (FPCA) is an extension of multivariate principal components analysis which examines the variability of a sample of curves and has been used to examine differences in movement patterns of several groups of individuals. Currently the functional principal components (FPCs) for each group are either determined separately (yielding components that are group-specific), or by combining the data for all groups and determining the FPCs of the combined data (yielding components that summarize the entire data set). The group-specific FPCs contain both within and between group variation and issues arise when comparing FPCs across groups when the order of the FPCs alter in each group. The FPCs of the combined data may not adequately describe all groups of individuals and comparisons between groups typically use t-tests of the mean FPC scores in each group. When these differences are statistically non-significant it can be difficult to determine how a particular intervention is affecting movement patterns or how injured subjects differ from controls. In this paper we aim to perform FPCA in a manner allowing sensible comparisons between groups of curves. A statistical technique called common functional principal components analysis (CFPCA) is implemented. CFPCA identifies the common sources of variation evident across groups but allows the order of each component to change for a particular group. This allows for the direct comparison of components across groups. We use our method to analyze a biomechanical data set examining the mechanisms of chronic Achilles tendon injury and the functional effects of orthoses.

Bootstrap Methods for Canonical Correlation Analysis of Functional Data

Bootstrap methods for stationary functional time series

Bootstrap Inference for Panel Data Quantile Regression

Moving Blocks Bootstrap Control Chart For Dependent Multivariate Data

Bootstrap inference in functional linear regression models with scalar response under heteroscedasticity

Hypothesis Testing for Functional Linear Models via Bootstrapping

A parametric bootstrap approach for computing confidence intervals for genetic correlations with application to genetically-determined protein-protein networks

High-dimensional MANOVA via Bootstrapping and its Application to Functional and Sparse Count Data

The Big Data Bootstrap

Bootstrap Prediction Bands for Functional Time Series

A novel bootstrap goodness-of-fit test for normal linear regression models

Common functional principal components analysis: A new approach to analyzing human movement data

The use of bootstrap methods for analysing Health-Related Quality of Life outcomes (particularly the SF-36)

An Introduction to Bootstrap Theory in Time Series Econometrics

A New Bootstrap Goodness-of-Fit Test for Normal Linear Regression Models

Bootstrapping time series models

The autoregression bootstrap for kernel estimates of smooth nonlinear functional time series

Robust smoothed canonical correlation analysis for functional data

Asymmetric canonical correlation analysis of Riemannian and high-dimensional data

A Tutorial on Canonical Correlation Methods

Bootstrapping Financial Time Series