Different Remediation Methods Altered Soil Health Status by Regulating the Key Processes of Soil Nitrogen Transformation

Runhui Zhou,Dongmei Hao,Jia Luo,Wei Gao,Y. Wang,Yuxuan Zhang,Zilin Yuan,Tingqiang Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4635841
2023-01-01
Abstract:Remediation methods not only affect the remediation efficiency of soil heavy metals, but also affect the nutrient cycling and health status of soil. In this study, the effects of phytoextraction (PE), chelated phytoextraction (CP), phytoextraction coupled with intercrop (PCI), and passivation remediation (PR) on nitrogen (N) transformation and health status of Cd-polluted soil were compared. Results showed that PE, CP and PCI significantly reduced the concentrations of total Cd and available Cd, while PR only decreased available Cd content. PE, CP and PCI decreased both NH4+-N and NO3--N content in both red soil and paddy soil. However, PR significantly increased the potential nitrification rate (PNR) and potential denitrification rate (PDR) and thus increased the NO3--N content in both soils. PE decreased the bacterial community α-diversity while enriched more eutrophic groups (Proteobacteria and Actinobacteriota), which was conducive to the transformation of soil nutrients. PE and PCI showed higher soil N supply potential due to enhanced N fixation by increasing nifH gene copies (especially the contribution of Bradyrhizobium). PR showed the most active soil N conversion and the highest N2O emission risk due to the higher gene copies of AOB-amoA, nirK, nirS, nosZ and higher genus abundance such as Nitrospira, Nitrosospira, Massilia, Gemmatimonas. The soil comprehensive quality index (SQI) was as follows: PE (0.540) > CP (0.536) > PR (0.523) > PCI (0.499). These results suggest that PE was a promising remediation method that contributed to soil health due to high extraction efficiency, strong N fixation ability and low N loss risk.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?