Abstract:SARS-CoV-2 remains prevalent, with highly diverse strains carrying spike proteins with antigenic profiles distinct from those of the original strain (Wuhan Hu-1 or WT). Since November 2021, Omicron has acquired a remarkable capacity to outcompete previous SARS-CoV-2 and has become the dominant variant globally [1]. Extensive studies have provided insights into how the adult immune system, particularly humoral immunity, respond to SARS-CoV-2 and its variants, including Omicron [2]. A long-term study revealed that Omicron infections following previous Wuhan Hu-1 infections failed to increase the level of neutralizing antibodies against Omicron in adults [3]. This suggests an original antigenic sin (OAS), which tends to induce a recalled antibody response against preexposed antigens and weakens the response to new antigens, potentially explaining the frequent reinfections of SARS-CoV-2 variants. Other researchers have reported that the immune imprinting induced by WT vaccination biases antibody neutralization toward WT in Omicron breakthrough infections in adults [4, 5]. Previous research from our team has demonstrated the critical role of the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 in interacting with ACE2 and inducing neutralizing antibodies. Furthermore, mutations in the RBD significantly influence the neutralizing activity of existing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) [6]. We have also reported the characteristics of the immune response after WT infection in children, revealing the quick and potent induction of protective humoral immunity [7]. Nevertheless, the understanding of the antibody response against Omicron and other variants in children remains poorly understood. We investigated whether prior WT vaccination affects the humoral immune response to the newly encountered variants in children. The neutralizing activities of plasma antibodies against the Omicron BA.2 and WT strains were analyzed in the primary and breakthrough BA.2 infection groups. Both groups presented high levels of neutralizing antibodies against BA.2, with the breakthrough infection group exhibiting slightly higher neutralizing titers (Fig. 1B, C). Interestingly, compared with adults infected with BA.2 after vaccination [4, 5], children presented much higher levels of neutralizing antibodies against Omicron BA.2 than against WT, indicating that the antibody response to BA.2 was not significantly influenced by the OAS of prior WT vaccination. We further investigated the contribution of RBD- and S2-specific antibodies induced by BA.2 immune boosting. The plasma antibody binding titer of the breakthrough infection group to BA.2 RBD was significantly greater than that in the primary infection group (Supplementary Fig. 1), suggesting that previous exposure to the WT antigen contributed to the recalled antibody response against shared RBD epitopes between WT and BA.2. The S2 domain of the spike protein is conserved and has been identified as the target of several broadly neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) against SARS-CoV-2 and other human coronaviruses [9,10,11]. Although the antibody binding response to the recombinant S2 subdomain protein was very high, the antibody titers against the two major S2 neutralizing epitopes were generally weak. Only a limited number of individuals showed high binding activity to the S2' and fusion peptide epitopes, which are targeted by the pan-coronavirus human antibody 76E1 [9] (Supplementary Fig. 2). These findings suggest that the plasma polyclonal neutralizing activity was caused mainly by the antibodies targeting the RBD rather than the S2 domain. Overall, our data suggest that Omicron infection after previous WT vaccination induces strong neutralizing antibodies against Omicron, with no significant OAS effect observed in children.

Antibody Response and Cross-Neutralization after Omicron BA.2 Infection

Antibody Resistance of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1, BA.1.1, BA.2 and BA.3 Sub-lineages

Antibody evasion of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1, BA.1.1, BA.2, and BA.3 sub-lineages

Antibody evasion properties of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron sublineages

Immune Evasion of Neutralizing Antibodies by SARS-CoV-2 Omicron.

Neutralizing immunity against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 by infection and vaccination

Neutralization of Omicron BA.4/BA.5 and BA.2.75 by Booster Vaccination or BA.2 Breakthrough Infection Sera

BA.2.12.1, BA.4 and BA.5 escape antibodies elicited by Omicron infection

Omicron BA.1 breakthrough infection drives cross-variant neutralization and memory B cell formation against conserved epitopes

BA.2.12.1, BA.4 and BA.5 escape antibodies elicited by Omicron BA.1 infection

Emerging Omicron subvariants evade neutralizing immunity elicited by vaccine or BA.1/BA.2 infection

Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariant BA.2.87.1

Neutralizing Antibody Responses against Five SARS-CoV-2 Variants and T Lymphocyte Change after Vaccine Breakthrough Infections from the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 Variant in Tianjin, China: A Prospective Study

SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1.1 is Highly Resistant to Antibody Neutralization of Convalescent Serum from the Origin Strain

Comparison of the replication and neutralization of different <scp>SARS‐CoV</scp>‐2 Omicron subvariants in vitro

Characterization of the Enhanced Infectivity and Antibody Evasion of Omicron BA.2.75

Children exhibit a robust B-cell response to Omicron BA.2 after breakthrough infection with limited influence from the original antigenic sin

Neutralization sensitivity, fusogenicity, and infectivity of Omicron subvariants

Exposure to BA.4/5 S protein drives neutralization of Omicron BA.1, BA.2, BA.2.12.1, and BA.4/5 in vaccine-experienced humans and mice

Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Sub-lineages BA.1, BA.1.1, and BA.2

Cross-neutralizing antibody against emerging Omicron subvariants of SARS-CoV-2 in infection-naïve individuals with homologous BNT162b2 or BNT162b2(WT + BA.4/5) bivalent booster vaccination