Identification and Validation of Golgi Apparatus-Related Signature for Predicting Prognosis and Immunotherapy Response in Breast Cancer

Xin Chen,Pengting Tang,Ying Kong,Deqin Chen,Kejun Tang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-024-05612-w
2024-01-01
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
Abstract:BACKGROUND:The Golgi apparatus plays a pivotal role in various aspects of cancer. This study aims to investigate the predictive value of Golgi apparatus-related genes (GARGs) in breast cancer prognosis and immunotherapy response evaluation.METHODS:Transcriptional and clinical data from the TCGA-BRCA cohort and GSE96058 cohort were utilized to construct and validate a prognostic model for breast cancer using Cox regression analysis. Differences in immune landscape, somatic mutations, gene expression, drug sensitivity, and immunotherapy response between different risk groups were assessed. A prognostic nomogram for breast cancer was further developed and evaluated. qPCR and single-cell sequencing analyses were performed to validate the expression of GARGs.RESULTS:A total of 394 GARGs significantly associated with breast cancer prognosis were identified, leading to the construction of a prognostic risk feature comprising 10 GARGs. This feature effectively stratified breast cancer patients into high-risk and low-risk groups, with the high-risk group exhibiting significantly worse prognosis. Meanwhile, significant differences in clinicopathological features, immune infiltration, drug sensitivity, and immunotherapy response were observed between the high- and low-risk groups. The constructed nomogram incorporating these factors showed superior performance in prognostic assessment for breast cancer patients. Ultimately, the utilization of qPCR and single-cell sequencing techniques substantiated the disparate expression patterns of these prognostic genes in breast cancer.CONCLUSION:Our findings demonstrate that a prognostic risk feature derived from GARGs holds promising application potential for predicting prognosis and evaluating immunotherapy response in breast cancer patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?