Abstract:Traditional toxicity testing reliant on animal models is costly and low throughput, posing a significant challenge with the increasing numbers of chemicals that humans are exposed to in the environment. The purpose of this investigation was to build optimal prediction models for various human in vivo/organ-level toxicity end points (extracted from ChemIDPlus) using chemical structure and Tox21 in vitro quantitative high-throughput screening (qHTS) bioactivity assay data. Several supervised machine learning algorithms were applied to model 14 human toxicity end points pertaining to vascular, kidney, ureter and bladder, and liver organ systems. Three metrics were used to evaluate model performance: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC), balanced accuracy (BA), and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC). The top four models, with AUC-ROC values >0.8, were derived for endocrine (0.90 ± 0.00), musculoskeletal (0.88 ± 0.02), peripheral nerve and sensation (0.85 ± 0.01), and brain and coverings (0.83 ± 0.02) toxicities, whereas the best model AUC-ROC values were >0.7 for the remaining 10 toxicities. Model performance was found to be dependent on the specific data set, model type, and feature selection method used. In addition, chemical structure and assay data showed different levels of contribution to the prediction of different toxicity end points. Although in vitro assay data, when combined with chemical structure, slightly improved the predictive accuracy for most end points (11 out of 14), a noteworthy finding was the near equal success of the structure-only models, which do not require Tox21 qHTS screening data, and the relatively poor performance of assay-only models. Thus, the top-performing structure-only models from this study could be applied for hazard screening of large sets of chemicals for potential human toxicity, whereas the largest assay contributions to models (i.e., cellular targets) could be used, along with the top-contributing structural features, to provide insight into toxicity mechanisms.

QSAR Tools for Toxicity Prediction in Risk Assessment—comparative Analysis

QSAR Study on Toxicity of Chemical Components of Chinese Materia Medica and Acute Toxicity of Rats

Computational Toxicology and Its Application in Toxicity Study of Traditional Chinese Medicine

QSAR study on the toxicity of chemical components of Chinese materia medica causing the carcinogenicity of rats

QSAR Study on Rat Cardiotoxicity of Chemical Component of Chinese Herbs

QSAR models for predicting in vivo reproductive toxicity

Comparison of seven in silico tools for evaluating of daphnia and fish acute toxicity: case study on Chinese Priority Controlled Chemicals and new chemicals

Prediction of the Aquatic Toxicity of Aromatic Compounds to Tetrahymena Pyriformis Through Support Vector Regression

QSAR Study on Toxic Effects of Reactive Organic Compounds

Background, Tasks, Modeling Methods, And Challenges For Computational Toxicology

Artificial Intelligence-Based Toxicity Prediction of Environmental Chemicals: Future Directions for Chemical Management Applications.

QSAR method and its application to toxicity prediction of metal nanomaterials

The database makes the poison: How the selection of datasets in QSAR models impacts toxicant prediction of higher tier endpoints

Predictive Models for Human Organ Toxicity Based on in Vitro Bioactivity Data and Chemical Structure

Predicting Chemical Immunotoxicity through Data-Driven QSAR Modeling of Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Agonism and Related Toxicity Mechanisms

Quantitative structure–toxicity relationships in translational toxicology

ADMET Evaluation in Drug Discovery. Part 17: Development of Quantitative and Qualitative Prediction Models for Chemical-Induced Respiratory Toxicity.

In Silico Prediction Of Chemical Toxicity For Drug Design Using Machine Learning Methods And Structural Alerts

Computer‐aided Prediction of Toxicity with Substructure Pattern and Random Forest

In Silico Prediction of Chemical Reproductive Toxicity Using Machine Learning

Model for Toxicity of Substituted Aromatic Compounds to Aquatic Organisms