The different urban green-land spatial patterns and their environmental effects:A case of the central district of Yichang city,Hubei Province
zhou zhixiang,shao tianyi,tang wanpeng,wang pengcheng,liu xuequan,xu yongrong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2004.02.003
2004-01-01
Abstract:The urban green-land system plays an important role in improving the quality of urban environment and maintaining the balance of urban ecological system. However, the whole ecological benefit of green-land system is mainly determined by green-lands’ internal structures and spatial patterns when the percentage of green-land coverage is less than 40%. So far there hasn’t been any research on the relationship of urban green-land spatial pattern and its environmental effect. In this paper, the four types of landscape structures and their green-land landscape patterns, including the landscapes of dominant green-land patch pattern, even green-land patch pattern, dominant wooded corridor pattern and building or concrete covering pattern （control） on the central district of Yichang city in Hubei province, were analyzed on the basis of landscape ecological principle. The environmental effects of all landscapes were monitored at the same time, by means of the selected environmental parameters of air temperature, relative air humidity, atmospheric noise and the content of SO;, NO; and total suspension particle （TSP） respectively. The relationship of the green-land landscape patterns and their environmental effects were analyzed by comparative method, in order to put forward the rationalization parameters for optimizing the landscape structure of urban green-land system.The results showed that, though there was an unanimous general structure, such as roughly the same of total patch area, building or concrete covering patch area and woodless corridor area between the four landscapes, the environmental benefits were significantly different due to the unequal green-land coverage and the varied green-land landscape patterns. In which, the landscape of building or concrete covering pattern （control） was mostly composed of woodless corridors and building or concrete covering patches, which the green-land had the least total patch area and the tiptop fragmentation index, while the percentage of green-land coverage is only 1.00%. Therefore, there were adverse circumstances with the relatively higher air temperature, atmospheric noise, TSP content and the lower relative air humidity in the landscape. The landscape of dominant green-land patch pattern had the highest green-land coverage （up to 43.59%） and average patch area of green-land （29118m;） dominated by great green-land patches. In which, the green-land patches having the highest dominance and the least fragmentation index, coexisted with wooded corridors in possession of the relatively higher total area and average area. The environmental effects of the landscape of dominant green-land patch pattern expressed mainly in air temperature decreasing, relative air humidity raising, atmospheric noise reduction and dust retention, in which the average relative air humidity increased by 5.93%, the average atmospheric noise weakened by 28.12% and the TSP content reduced significantly by 86.42% while the contents of SO; and NO; had no significantly difference comparing to the control. The landscape of even green-land patch pattern had the relatively lower green-land coverage （11.34%）, dominance and fragmentation index of green-land patch, while the total area and average area of wooded corridor were bigger than that of green-land patches. The green-land landscape with a regular distribution in the landscape was mainly composed of the middle or small green-land patches coexisting with wooded corridors. Comparing to the control, the average relative air humidity increased distinctly by 4.64%, the TSP content reduced obviously by 46.62%, the air temperature and atmospheric noise also had an obviously decreasing in the landscape, which revealed the same effects as the landscape of dominant green-land patch pattern. But the effects of dust retention and atmospheric noise reduction were only 53.95% and 12.45% of that in the landscape of dominant green-land patch pattern, respectively. There were only 6.13% green-land coverage and the smaller total and average area of green-land patch in the land