Supplementary Figures 1-6 and Tables 1-2 from Entrectinib, a Pan–TRK, ROS1, and ALK Inhibitor with Activity in Multiple Molecularly Defined Cancer Indications

Elena Ardini,Maria Menichincheri,Patrizia Banfi,Roberta Bosotti,Cristina De Ponti,Romana Pulci,Dario Ballinari,Marina Ciomei,Gemma Texido,Anna Degrassi,Nilla Avanzi,Nadia Amboldi,Maria Beatrice Saccardo,Daniele Casero,Paolo Orsini,Tiziano Bandiera,Luca Mologni,David Anderson,Ge Wei,Jason Harris,Jean-Michel Vernier,Gang Li,Eduard Felder,Daniele Donati,Antonella Isacchi,Enrico Pesenti,Paola Magnaghi,Arturo Galvani
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.22508040.v1
2023-01-01
Abstract:Supplementary Figure 1. Efficacy of entrectinib on KM12 xenograft model using the scheduling 4 days on/ 3 days off. Supplementary Figure 2. Mechanism of action of entrectinib compared to crizotinib in ALK-dependent Ba/F3 cells. Supplementary Figure 3. Cell cycle distrivbution of Karpas-299 and SR-786 cells treated with entrectinib for different periods of time Supplementary Figure 4. Mechanism of action studies of entrectinib in additional ALK-dependent ALCL models Supplementary Figure 5. In vivo efficacy of entrectinib on NCI-H2228 xenograft model using the scheduling 4 days on/ 3 days off Supplementary Figure 6. Representative magnetic resonance images of mice bearing intracranial tumors treated with vehicle, entrectinib or crizotinib Supplementary Table 1. List of human tumor cell lines treated with entrectinib Supplementary Table 2. Pharmacokinetic paramenters of entrectinib evaluated after repeated administration of compound in CD1 mice.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?