Figures S1-S10 and Tables S1, S3-S6 from Dynamics of Age- Versus Therapy-Related Clonal Hematopoiesis in Long-term Survivors of Pediatric Cancer

Kohei Hagiwara,Sivaraman Natarajan,Zhaoming Wang,Haseeb Zubair,Heather L. Mulder,Dong Li,Emily M. Plyler,T. Padma,Xiaotu Ma,Kirsten K. Ness,Zhenghong Li,Daniel A. Mulrooney,Carmen L. Wilson,Yutaka Yasui,Melissa M. Hudson,John Easton,Leslie L. Robison,Jinghui Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.22546963
2023-01-01
Abstract:Figure S1: Age distribution of the cohort. Figure S2: The distribution of bleomycin 3rd tertile. Figure S3: Distribution of cancer types treated without alkylating agents, platinum, anthracyclines, bleomycin, dactinomycin, epipodophyllotoxins, methotrexate, vinca alkaloids. Figure S4: Conceptual illustration for age- and therapy-related clonal hematopoiesis. Figure S5: Distribution of cell phenotypes harboring STAT3 Y640F mutation. Figure S6: Regression analysis on public dataset to reproduce the clone expansion pattern in main Figure 4A. Figure S7: Longitudinal view of the serial samples. Figure S8: Simulation analysis to reproduce the pattern in main Figure 4B. Figure S9: Comparison of clone growth rates and clone sizes between age- and therapy-related CH. Figure S10: Additional sequencing for PPM1D. Table S1: Gene panel. Table S3: Comparison between CH and sex, race and age. Table S4: Comparison between CH status and pathogenic germline mutations. Separately analyzed for cancer predisposition genes and DNA damage repair genes. Table S5: Enrichment of STAT3 mutations in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors. Table S6: Association between procarbazine exposure and mutation pattern in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?