OP05 Use of qualitative, epidemiological and genomic data from COVID-19 outbreaks in prisons in the North East of England in 2020 to identify lessons for improved outbreak control*

Hannah Jary,Matthew Crown,Matthew Bashton,Darren Smith,Stephanie Alice Baker,Samantha Gray,Rebecca E. Waugh,Sheena E Ramsay,Abe Hamoodi,Nicola Love
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2023-ssmabstracts.5
2023-01-01
Abstract:<h3>Background</h3> The UK criminal justice system faced unprecedented challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic: prison outbreaks caused considerable pressures at all stages of the criminal justice pathway, and inmates were vulnerable to physical and mental ill health. We describe the COVID-19 outbreaks in North East England’s prisons during 2020 to identify opportunities for improved future outbreak control. <h3>Methods</h3> We collected standardised epidemiological data from all regional prisons (n=7) to describe outbreaks during 2020. Cases were defined as staff or inmates who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR. We administered written questionnaires to all Outbreak Control Team (OCT) members and conducted semi-structured interviews with key OCT members. Qualitative data from questionnaires and interviews, along with OCT minutes, were coded into themes. Genomic sequences were retrieved for all available positive inmate SARS-CoV-2 PCR samples and compared to background samples in the COVID-19 Genomics UK Consortium (COG-UK) public dataset using the Cluster Investigation & Virus Epidemiology Tool (CIVET, version 3.0.1). Approval for this study was granted by the Public Health England Research Ethics and Governance Group (Reference NR0269). Epidemiological and genomic data were collected as part of standard outbreak/pandemic response. <h3>Results</h3> Fifteen outbreaks from seven prisons occurred in 2020 (median size: 48 cases, interquartile range (IQR):16.5–188; median duration: 94 days (IQR:64–102 days), with 1844 cases (58.5% in inmates (median attack rate 1.9%, IQR 0.5–12.1%) and 41.5% in staff (median attack rate 8.5%, IQR 2.9–20.8%)). We analysed data from 34 questionnaires (46% response rate), 12 interviews and 107 OCT minutes. Inmate transfers, inmate characteristics, prison layout, lack of social distancing and symptom concealment were all thought to influence transmission. Analysis to date has identified 458 samples meeting CIVET quality control requirements and these were placed within catchment trees using a background of 421,746 samples from the COG-UK data. Fourteen genetically distinct sub-catchments of SARS-CoV-2 were identified across the 15 outbreaks. Four sub-catchments were identified in two or more prisons. Three outbreaks had isolates belonging to three or more sub-catchments. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Prison and inmate characteristics, and pressures within the wider system, presented unique challenges for controlling transmission. Genetic data suggested transmission occurred between prisons. Some outbreaks appeared to have multiple introductions of the virus. Evidence from this study can be used to inform prison outbreak policies and minimise the impact of future outbreaks, for example, focussing control measures, including testing, on key routes of transmission such as inmate transfers.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?