Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways
Alexander Popp,Katherine Calvin,Shinichiro Fujimori,Petr Havlik,Florian Humpenöder,Elke Stehfest,Benjamin Leon Bodirsky,Jan Philipp Dietrich,Jonathan C. Doelmann,Mykola Gusti,Tomoko Hasegawa,Page Kyle,Michael Obersteiner,Andrzej Tabeau,Kiyoshi Takahashi,Hugo Valin,Stephanie Waldhoff,Isabelle Weindl,Marshall Wise,Elmar Kriegler,Hermann Lotze-Campen,Oliver Fricko,Keywan Riahi,Detlef P. van Vuuren
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.002
IF: 11.16
2017-01-01
Global Environmental Change
Abstract:In the future, the land system will be facing new intersecting challenges. While food demand, especially for resource-intensive livestock based commodities, is expected to increase, the terrestrial system has large potentials for climate change mitigation through improved agricultural management, providing biomass for bioenergy, and conserving or even enhancing carbon stocks of ecosystems. However, uncertainties in future socio-economic land use drivers may result in very different land-use dynamics and consequences for land-based ecosystem services. This is the first study with a systematic interpretation of the Shared Socio-Economic Pathways (SSPs) in terms of possible land-use changes and their consequences for the agricultural system, food provision and prices as well as greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, five alternative Integrated Assessment Models with distinctive land-use modules have been used for the translation of the SSP narratives into quantitative projections. The model results reflect the general storylines of the SSPs and indicate a broad range of potential land-use futures with global agricultural land of 4900 mio ha in 2005 decreasing by 743 mio ha until 2100 at the lower (SSP1) and increasing by 1080 mio ha (SSP3) at the upper end. Greenhouse gas emissions from land use and land use change, as a direct outcome of these diverse land-use dynamics, and agricultural production systems differ strongly across SSPs (e.g. cumulative land use change emissions between 2005 and 2100 range from −54 to 402 Gt CO2). The inclusion of land-based mitigation efforts, particularly those in the most ambitious mitigation scenarios, further broadens the range of potential land futures and can strongly affect greenhouse gas dynamics and food prices. In general, it can be concluded that low demand for agricultural commodities, rapid growth in agricultural productivity and globalized trade, all most pronounced in a SSP1 world, have the potential to enhance the extent of natural ecosystems, lead to lowest greenhouse gas emissions from the land system and decrease food prices over time. The SSP-based land use pathways presented in this paper aim at supporting future climate research and provide the basis for further regional integrated assessments, biodiversity research and climate impact analysis.