Abstract:Preprint is a version of a scientific paper that is publicly distributed preceding formal peer review. Since the launch of arXiv in 1991, preprints have been increasingly distributed over the Internet as opposed to paper copies. It allows open online access to disseminate the original research within a few days, often at a very low operating cost. This work overviews how preprint has been evolving and impacting the research community over the past thirty years alongside the growth of the Web. In this work, we first report that the number of preprints has exponentially increased 63 times in 30 years, although it only accounts for 4% of research articles. Second, we quantify the benefits that preprints bring to authors: preprints reach an audience 14 months earlier on average and associate with five times more citations compared with a non-preprint counterpart. Last, to address the quality concern of preprints, we discover that 41% of preprints are ultimately published at a peer-reviewed destination, and the published venues are as influential as papers without a preprint version. Additionally, we discuss the unprecedented role of preprints in communicating the latest research data during recent public health emergencies. In conclusion, we provide quantitative evidence to unveil the positive impact of preprints on individual researchers and the community. Preprints make scholarly communication more efficient by disseminating scientific discoveries more rapidly and widely with the aid of Web technologies. The measurements we present in this study can help researchers and policymakers make informed decisions about how to effectively use and responsibly embrace a preprint culture.

Is the Acceptance Time Shorter for Submission with Preprints?

Accelerated Acceptance Time for Preprint Submissions: a Comparative Analysis Based on PubMed

Preprints as accelerator of scholarly communication: An empirical analysis in Mathematics

The Position of Preprint in Scholarly Communication: A Bibliometric and Empirical Study of ArXiv.

Is preprint the future of science? A thirty year journey of online preprint services

How the Scientific Community Reacts to Newly Submitted Preprints: Article Downloads, Twitter Mentions, and Citations

Is peer review duration shorter for attractive manuscripts?

Releasing a preprint is associated with more attention and citations for the peer-reviewed article

Is there any measurable benefit in publishing preprints in the arXiv section Quantitative Biology?

How many preprints have actually been printed and why: a case study of computer science preprints on arXiv

The Consistency of Impact of Preprints and Their Journal Publications.

Estimating the Causal Effect of Early ArXiving on Paper Acceptance

Does the Handling Time of Scientific Papers Relate to Their Academic Impact and Social Attention? Evidence from Nature, Science, and PNAS

Do conspicuous manuscripts experience shorter time in the duration of peer review?

COVID-19-Related manuscripts: lag from preprint to publication

An Analysis of Delay in Publication of 293 Medical Postgraduates' Research Papers

The Emergence of Preprints: Comparing Publishing Behaviour in the Global South and the Global North

The Impact of Preprints in Library and Information Science: an Analysis of Citations, Usage and Social Attention Indicators

The Impact of Preprints on the Citations of Journal Articles Related to COVID-19

Supporting open science: Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine and preprints

A guide to shortening the time from submission to publication in Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering