Analysis of Chamber Data

Paul W. Seakins,Arnaud Allanic,A. Jammoul,Albelwahid Mellouki,Amalia Muñoz,Andrew R. Rickard,Jean‐François Doussin,Jörg Kleffmann,Juha Kangasluoma,Katrianne Lehtipalo,Kerrigan P. Cain,Lubna Dada,Markku Kulmala,Mathieu Cazaunau,Mike J. Newland,Milagros Ródenas,Peter Wiesen,Spiro D. Jorga,Spyros N. Pandis,Tuukka Petäj̈ä

2023-01-01

Abstract:Abstract In this chapter, we focus on aspects of analysis of typical simulation chamber experiments and recommend best practices in term of data analysis of simulation chamber results relevant for both gas phase and particulate phase atmospheric chemistry. The first two sections look at common gas-phase measurements of relative rates and product yields. The simple yield expressions are extended to account for product removal. In the next two sections, we examine aspects of particulate phase chemistry looking firstly at secondary organic aerosol (SOA) yields including correction for wall losses, and secondly at new particle formation using a variety of methods. Simulations of VOC oxidation processes are important components of chamber work and one wants to present methods that lead to fundamental chemistry and not to specific aspects of the chamber that the experiment was carried out in. We investigate how one can analyse the results of a simulation experiment on a well-characterized chemical system (ethene oxidation) to determine the chamber-specific corrections. Finally, we look at methods of analysing photocatalysis experiments, some with a particular focus on NO x reduction by TiO 2 -doped surfaces. In such systems, overall reactivity is controlled by both chemical processes and transport. Chambers can provide useful practical information, but care needs to be taken in extrapolating results to other conditions. The wider impact of surfaces on photosmog formation is also considered.