Abstract:While it is somewhat well known that spatial PDE extensions of the Rosenzweig–MacArthur predator–prey model do not admit spatial pattern formation through the Turing mechanism, in this paper we demonstrate that the addition of allochthonous resources into the system can result in spatial patterning and colony formation. We study pattern formation, through Turing and Turing–Hopf mechanisms, in two distinct spatial Rosenzweig–MacArthur models generalized to include allochthonous resources. Both models have previously been shown to admit heterogeneous spatial solutions when prey and allochthonous resources are confined to different regions of the domain, with the predator able to move between the regions. However, pattern formation in such cases is not due to the Turing mechanism, but rather due to the spatial separation between the two resources for the predator. On the other hand, for a variety of applications, a predator can forage over a region where more than one food source is present, and this is the case we study in the present paper. We first consider a three PDE model, consisting of equations for each of a predator, a prey, and an allochthonous resource or subsidy, with all three present over the spatial domain. The second model we consider arises in the study of two independent predator–prey systems in which a portion of the prey in the first system becomes an allochthonous resource for the second system; this is referred to as a predator–prey–quarry–resource–scavenger model. We show that there exist parameter regimes for which these systems admit Turing and Turing–Hopf bifurcations, again resulting in spatial or spatiotemporal patterning and hence colony formation. This is interesting from a modeling standpoint, as the standard spatially extended Rosenzweig–MacArthur predator–prey equations do not permit the Turing instability, and hence, the inclusion of allochthonous resources is one route to realizing colony formation under Rosenzweig–MacArthur kinetics. Concerning the ecological application, we find that spatial patterning occurs when the predator is far more mobile than the prey (reflected in the relative difference between their diffusion parameters), with the prey forming colonies and the predators more uniformly dispersed throughout the domain. We discuss how this spatially heterogeneous patterning, particularly of prey populations, may constitute one way in which the paradox of enrichment is resolved in spatial systems by way of introducing allochthonous resource subsidies in conjunction with spatial diffusion of predator and prey populations.

Resource-Driven Pattern Formation in Consumer-Resource Systems with Asymmetric Dispersal on a Plane

Spatial dispersal in chemostat systems with agent-based asymmetry

Global Dynamics of A Tritrophic Model for Two Patches with Cost of Dispersal

A Two Patch Prey-Predator Model with Multiple Foraging Strategies in Predator: Applications to Insects

A two patch prey-predator model with multiple foraging strategies in predators: Applications to Insects

Spatial Pattern In A Predator-Prey System With Both Self- And Cross-Diffusion

A Two-Patch Prey-Predator Model with Predator Dispersal Driven by the Predation Strength.

A two-patch prey-predator model with dispersal in predators driven by the strength of predation

One way or another: Combined effect of dispersal and asymmetry on total realized asymptotic population abundance

Dynamical persistence in resource-consumer models

Pattern Dynamics in A Spatial Predator-Prey System with Allee Effect

Dispersal Effects on a Discrete Two-Patch Model for Plant–insect Interactions

Turing Instability and Colony Formation in Spatially Extended Rosenzweig–MacArthur Predator–Prey Models with Allochthonous Resources

Dynamics of a consumer–resource reaction–diffusion model

A Stage-Structured Continuous-/Discrete-Time Population Model: Persistence and Spatial Spread

Active pattern formation emergent from single-species nonreciprocity

Spatiotemporal Patterns in a Ratio-Dependent Food Chain Model with Reaction-Diffusion

General relationships between consumer dispersal, resource dispersal and metacommunity diversity

Interspecific dispersal constraints suppress pattern formation in metacommunities

Carrying Capacity of Spatially Distributed Metapopulations

Pattern Dynamics of Cross Diffusion Predator–Prey System with Strong Allee Effect and Hunting Cooperation