Computed Tomography-Guided Core Needle Biopsy for Pulmonary Nodules: Comparison Between with and Without Co-Axial Technique

Qunqun Zhu,Li Zhang,Fengfei Xia,Yi-Bing Shi,Lei Zhu,Xianxian Liang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3355930/v1
2024-01-01
Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques
Abstract:Abstract Background Computed tomography (CT)-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) procedures are widely used to evaluate and assign a diagnosis to pulmonary nodules (PNs), with the co-axial technique (CAT) being widely used to aid this procedure. The present study was designed to compare the safety and diagnostic performance of using CT-guided CNB procedures to diagnose PNs when performing these procedures with and without CAT. Methods Between January 2017 and December 2019, this retrospective analysis incorporated consecutive patients undergoing CT-guided CNB for PNs, after which data of interest were compared between these groups. Results In total, CT-guided CNB procedures were performed with and without CAT in 111 and 108 respective patients. The CAT group exhibited a significantly lower mean needle pathway number as compared to the non-CAT group (P < 0.001), whereas the mean sample number in the CAT group was significantly greater than that in the non-CAT group (P < 0.001). The mean CNB procedural duration in the CAT group was also significantly reduced as compared to the non-CAT group (P < 0.001). While both groups exhibited similar diagnostic accuracy (98.3% vs. 96.3%, P = 0.600), the CAT group outperformed the non-CAT group with respect to diagnostic yield (81.4% vs. 68.5%, P = 0.026). Pneumothorax and pulmonary hemorrhage rats were similar in these groups (P = 0.092 and 0.164). Conclusion Relative to CT-guided CNB procedures performed without the CAT, those performed with the CAT exhibited fewer needle pathways and shorter operative duration, while increasing obtained samples and improving diagnostic yields.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?