Rethinking the P(4457)+ as the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" altimg="si1.svg"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ψ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo linebreak="badbreak" linebreakstyle="after">+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mn>4457</mml:mn><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:math> …

Fang‐Zheng Peng,Mao-Jun Yan,Mario Sánchez Sánchez,Manuel Pavón Valderrama
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138207
IF: 4.95
2023-01-01
Physics Letters B
Abstract:The nature of the Pc(4312), Pc(4440) and Pc(4457) pentaquarks is a fascinating theoretical question. Within the molecular picture their more usual interpretation is that of I=12 D¯Σc and D¯⁎Σc bound states. Here we argue in favor of interpreting the Pc(4457) pentaquark as a I=32 D¯⁎Σc bound state (with spin J=12) instead. Owing to isospin symmetry breaking effects, with this identification the partial decay width of the Pc(4457)+ into J/ψp will be of the same order of magnitude as the Pc(4312)+ and Pc(4440)+, in contrast with the considerably larger partial decay width in the I=12 scenario. In turn, this leads to a different hidden-charm molecular pentaquark spectrum, in which there are only four or five PψN bound states instead of the usual seven, which might explain why the predicted J=12 and 32 (I=12) D¯⁎Σc⁎ molecular partners of the Pc(4312) and Pc(4440) have not been observed.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?