Extra-facet puncture PVP in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures

Huo‐Liang Zheng,Bo Li,Qingsong Jiang,Lei‐Sheng Jiang,Xianxu Zheng,Sheng‐Dan Jiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3215496/v1
2023-01-01
Abstract:Abstract PURPOSE To assess the safety and efficacy of the extra-facet puncture technique applied in unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). METHODS Demographics (age, gender, body mass index and underlying diseases) were recorded for analyzing. VAS (Visual analogue scale) and ODI (Oswestry Disability Index) scores as well as their corresponding MCID (minimal clinically important difference) were used to evaluate clinical outcomes. The segmental kyphotic angle, the vertebral compression ratio and bone cement distribution pattern were evaluated by the plain radiographs. The facet joint violation (FJV) was defined by the postoperative computed tomography (CT) scan. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate relationships between multiple risk factors and residual back pain. RESULTS VAS and ODI scores in both traditional puncture group and extra-facet puncture group were significantly decreased after PVP surgery (p<0.05). However, no significant difference was observed between the two groups according to VAS and ODI scores. The proportion of patients achieving MCID of VAS and ODI scores was higher in extra-facet puncture group as compared to traditional puncture group within a month (p<0.05). Finally, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that FJV (odds ratio [OR]: 16.38, p<0.001) and unilateral bone cement distribution (OR: 5.576, p = 0.020) were significant predictors of residual back pain after PVP surgery. CONCLUSIONS Extra-facet puncture percutaneous vertebroplasty can decrease the risk of FJV and it also has the advantage of more satisfied bone cement distribution.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?