Knowledge does not explode but increases linearly over time

Xinbing Wang,Huquan Kang,Luoyi Fu,Jiaxin Ding,Xiaojun Lin,Jianghao Wang,Lei Zhou,Chenghu Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3102533/v1
2023-01-01
Abstract:Abstract ChatGPT and GPT-4 have raised debates regarding the progress of knowledge in large language models 1-3 . The notion of "knowledge explosion" has been controversial in various variations since the 19th century 4-8 . Despite numerous indications to the contrary 9-11 , conclusive evidence on knowledge growth is lacking 12 . Here, we evaluated knowledge as a collective thinking structure within citation networks by analyzing large-scale datasets containing 213 million publications (1800–2020) and 7.6 million patents (1976–2020). We found that knowledge did not explode but grew linearly over time in naturally formed citation networks that expanded exponentially. Our theoretical analysis established that the knowledge never exceeds the size of the network, revealing the limitation of knowledge development. Moreover, our results showed that the knowledge expansion rate shifted at certain inflection points, implying quantitative-driven qualitative changes. Leaps near inflection points may instigate a "knowledge explosion" delusion, allowing us to reconcile the spreading of the misconception. Inflection points in knowledge growth exhibited similar characteristics to the emergent ability of artificial intelligence 13 , furnishing fresh insights into the singularities and emergence in complex systems. Overall, our findings reveal a slow pace of knowledge compared to data, reacquainting us with the progress of knowledge over time.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?