Mastery and demand analysis of auxiliary examination results interpretation by general practitioners

Juanjuan Liu,Jingjing Ren
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2606194/v1
2023-01-01
Abstract:Abstract Background: The interpretation of auxiliary examination results is an important link in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of general practitioners. The purpose of this study was to investigate general practitioners' mastery and demand of auxiliary examination results interpretation. Methods: A self-designed online questionnaire was conducted among general practitioners. The content includes basic information, the mastery of the interpretation of auxiliary examination results, the demand for the interpretation of auxiliary examination results in clinical work, and the demand for the teaching of auxiliary examination results interpretation. Results: A total of 400 general practitioners were involved in the survey, with an average age of 35.5±8.9 years, of which 33.75% were male. The top three results of auxiliary examinations with good mastery are ECG (266,66.5%), X-ray (259,64.75%) and Ultrasound Diagnosis (230,57.5%);Among 400 general practitioners, 397 general practitioners believed that it was necessary to master the interpretation skills of auxiliary examination results, the top three interpretation of auxiliary examination results that the general practitioner thought highly necessary are ECG (322,80.7%), X-ray (308,77.19%) and Ultrasound Diagnosis (289,72.43%). The most desired interpretation of training inspection results order is:ECG (272,68.17%), CT examination(269,67.42%) and Ultrasound Diagnosis (289,72.43%).The most desired further clinical treatment order is:ECG (377,94.25%), CT examination(374,93.5%) and X-ray inspection 374,93.5%). Conclusions : The interpretation of auxiliary examination results is a necessary skill for general practitioners(GPs) to independently undertake general medical work. We hope to provide reference for the training of general practitioners in the interpretation of auxiliary examination results, help GPs better master interpretation skills of auxiliary examination results, and cultivate more excellent general practitioners for the grassroots.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?