Abstract:Statement of problem. Intraoral scanning has benefits over conventional impression making, but whether scanning is sufficiently accurate for multiple implants is unclear.Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the trueness of digital scans acquired by using intraoral scanners from a small range to a complete arch with the conventional impression technique and to determine the influence of 2 different evaluation methods (best -fit algorithm versus absolute linear deviation) on the outcomes of accuracy assessment.Material and methods. A mandibular model with 8 implants (A-H) around an edentulous arch was used as the master model. Open-format standard tessellation language (STL) data sets (1 reference file from a highly accurate dental laboratory scanner, 10 files from an intraoral scanner, and 10 files from digitized conventional impressions at room temperature) were imported to a metrology software program, and 5 groups of scanning ranges (AB, FGH, CDEF, BCDEFG, and ABCDEFGH) were identified simulating different clinical situations. Two evaluation methods -root mean square values calculated from the best -fit algorithm and average value of linear discrepancies from absolute linear deviation -were used to describe the trueness values. The impacts of different scanning or impression methods, ranges, and evaluation methods were tested by using a 3-way ANOVA. The effect of the scanning range on accuracy was further identified with 1-way ANOVA. The paired-sample t test was used to determine the differences of trueness values between the 2 methods in different groups.Results. The trueness values of the implant impressions were significantly affected by different scanning or impression methods (P<.001), evaluation methods (P<.001), and scanning ranges (P<.001) as independent variables. With use of the best -fit algorithm, deviations from the digital scans were significantly greater than those from the conventional impressions in cross -arch situations (groups CDEF, BCDEFG, and ABCDEFGH). With use of the absolute linear deviation method, statistically significant lower accuracy was found when larger areas were encountered (groups BCDEFG and ABCDEFGH). Use of the absolute linear deviation method resulted in a higher mean score of inaccuracy than that from the best -fit algorithm method in most situations.Conclusions. Scanning or impression methods, ranges, and evaluation methods affected the dimensional accuracy (trueness) of scans or impressions with multiple implants. Digital scans had worse trueness values compared with those made with the conventional splinting open-tray technique when cross-arch implant impressions were acquired. (J Prosthet Dent 2022;128:1017-23)

A preliminary study on the digital evaluation of absolute marginal discrepancy of fixed dental prostheses

Digital measurement method for comparing the absolute marginal discrepancy of three-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses fabricated using conventional and digital technologies

Digital Evaluation of Absolute Marginal Discrepancy: A Comparison of Ceramic Crowns Fabricated with Conventional and Digital Techniques

An evaluation of marginal fit of three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated by direct metal laser sintering system

Framework's marginal adaptation evaluation of fixed partial denture using conventional and digital impression techniques

Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial

Effect of Different Impression Techniques on Marginal Fit of Restoration – An In Vitro Study

Effect of CNC-milling on the marginal and internal fit of dental ceramics: a pilot study

Digital analysis of fabrication accuracy and fit in additively and subtractively manufactured implant-supported fixed complete dentures

Influence of impression method and shoulder design on the marginal adaptation of CAD/CAM nanoceramic resin onlay restorations

The Accuracy of a Novel 3D Digital Evaluation Method of Intraoral Fitness for Removable Partial Dentures.

Accuracy, fit, and marginal quality of advanced additively manufactured and milled zirconia 3-unit fixed dental prostheses

Marginal discrepancy of 3-unit Co-Cr metal copings fabricated with additive and subtractive manners: A comparative study

Comparative clinical study of the marginal discrepancy of fixed dental prosthesis fabricated by the milling-sintering method using a presintered alloy

Evaluation of the Impact of Digital Dentistry on the Precision of Implant Placement and Prosthesis Fabrication: An In-Vitro Study

Evaluating the absolute marginal discrepancy of full crown with a digital method

Accuracy of Impressions for Multiple Implants: A Comparative Study of Digital and Conventional Techniques

Comparison of marginal and internal fit of three-unit implant-supported fixed prosthetic substructures fabricated using CAD/CAM systems

Accuracy of digital complete dentures: A systematic review of in vitro studies

Comparison of the Marginal and Internal Fit of Ceramic Laminate Veneers Fabricated with Four Different Computer-Aided Manufacturing Techniques

A comparison of two digital techniques for the fabrication of complete removable dental prostheses: A pilot clinical study