Coins, Cards, or Apps: Impact of Payment Methods on Street Parking Occupancy and Wait Times

Sena Onen Oz,Mehmet Gumus,Wei Qi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4444172

2023-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:City dwellers often struggle with on-street parking. In most cities, once finally finding a curbside spot, drivers must pay in advance. However, drivers usually cannot accurately foresee how much parking time they need. Compared with traditional payment methods, i.e., cash and credit card through on-site meters, mobile payment applications provide more flexibility: Drivers can adjust their parking sessions remotely if a longer stay is in need. This paper examines how different payment methods affect drivers’ payment behavior and the implications concerning street parking occupancy and incurred wait. We develop an analytical model for the optimal payment amount and analyze the patterns in payment amounts using a regression discontinuity design. Collaborating with a municipal agency of one of the most densely populated cities in North America, we analyze massive and high-resolution records of street-parking payments over multiple years. The empirical findings indicate that drivers’ paid parking durations vary significantly depending on their preferred payment methods and on parking prices. Drivers tend to pay less when they pay with cash or via mobile applications than with credit cards. To provide further guidance to municipalities, we simulate the street parking situation to verify the effects of the variations produced by each payment method and pricing on the parking occupancy and wait. Our study shows that using a mobile app results in a 6.5-minute decrease in the average wait for parking and a 3.6% decrease in street parking occupancy. Finally, a decrease in parking prices has asymmetrical effects on occupancy and wait because of the nonlinear relationship between occupancy and wait. A $1 decrease in price leads to a 6.3% increase in occupancy, while a $1 increase leads to a 4.7% decrease. In terms of waiting time, a $1 increase results in a four-minute decrease, while a $1 decrease leads to a 12-minute increase. This research not only enriches the payment method literature by identifying the unique context of street parking (contrasting consumer products) but also shows that adjusting parking prices along with promoting mobile payment is potentially a helpful policy instrument toward the goal of alleviating our everyday pain of curbside parking.