Instruments for Best Target Position Determination in the High-Intensity Laser-Solid Interaction Experiment

Eugene A. Vishnyakov,Akito Sagisaka,Koichi Ogura,Tatiana A. Pikuz,Chris D. Armstrong,Sergey A. Pikuz,Bruno Gonzalez-Izquierdo,Timur Z. Esirkepov,Wenchao Yan,Tae Moon Jeong,Sushil Singh,Prokopis Hadjisolomou,Ondrej Finke,Gabriele Maria Grittani,Michal Nevrkla,Carlo Maria Lazzarini,Andriy Velyhan,Takehito Hayakawa,Yuji Fukuda,James K. Koga,Masahiko Ishino,Kotaro Kondo,Yasuhiro Miyasaka,Akira Kon,Masaharu Nishikino,Evgeny V. Nosach,Danila Khikhlukha,Ilya P. Tsygvintsev,Deepak Kumar,Jaroslav Nejdl,Daniele Margarone,Pavel V. Sasorov,Masaki Kando,Hiromitsu Kiriyama,Georg Korn,Kiminori Kondo,Sergei V. Bulanov,Tetsuya Kawachi,Alexander S. Pirozhkov
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2665527
2023-01-01
Abstract:We review a number of instruments employed in a high-intensity J-KAREN-P laser-solid interaction experiment and discuss the applicability of the diagnostics to the best target position determination with a ~10 μm accuracy, while the focal spot size was ~1 μm and peak intensity was up to 7×1021 W/cm2. We discuss both front- and back-side diagnostics, some of them operated in the infrared, visible and ultraviolet ranges, while others in the extreme ultraviolet, soft X-ray and gamma-ray ranges. We found that the applicability of some of the instruments to the best at-focus target position determination depends on the thickness of the target.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?