Coronavirus Disease 2019 emergency is over but the pandemic is not: implications for a new global order

Okesanya Olalekan John,Emery Manirambona,Julian M. A. Buban,Olaleke Noah Olabode,Don Eliseo Lucero‐Prisno

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/gh9.0000000000000207

2023-01-01

International Journal of Surgery

Abstract:On December 8, 2019, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) first appeared in the city of Wuhan, located in the Hubei province of China. On January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) formally announced the COVID-19 outbreak as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern whereas on March 11, 2020, the outbreak was declared as a global pandemic1. According to the latest available data by WHO as of May 7, 2023, there have been over 765 million confirmed cases and over 6.9 million deaths reported worldwide due to COVID-192. On May 5, 2023, the WHO officially ended the emergency declaration for COVID-19, marking a significant milestone in the global response to the pandemic. This initial declaration was made over 3 years ago and reflects the ongoing efforts to recover from a crisis that has resulted in millions of deaths and unprecedented disruptions to daily life worldwide. Despite the announcement, WHO officials have emphasized that this does not indicate the end of the pandemic. They have warned countries against dismantling their COVID-19 response systems and advised maintaining vigilance in tackling the ongoing global health crisis3. The United States announced its decision to lift its own COVID-19 emergency designation on May 11. As this action aligns with the lifting of the WHO designation as a “public health emergency of international concern,” it is seen as a significant development in the ongoing global response to the novel coronavirus4. Following the WHO’s lead, many other countries have already taken steps to lift their own states of emergency related to COVID-19. In addition, several nations have reduced or eliminated public health restrictions that were implemented to contain the spread of the virus. However, it is important to note that the global pandemic is still ongoing, and experts continue to stress the importance of maintaining precautionary measures and public health strategies to effectively manage the situation3. As the end of the COVID-19 emergency status is being announced, there is an urgent need for a new post-COVID-19 global order to guide the evolving nature of our relationship with the virus as we continue to adapt and navigate through the challenges posed by the pandemic. The global unity and support fostered during the period of worldwide lockdown and outbreak provide a strong basis for future endeavors. It is important to cultivate and maintain this sense of solidarity beyond the current circumstances as we look to manage this virus5. The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the vulnerabilities and weaknesses of many countries and the existing global order. To this end, there is a need for precautionary measures to be implemented globally to detect early indications of a previously unknown and potentially hazardous pathogen and respond to it. Authorities have already begun to take such measures: in October 2022, the US government announced the formulation of a national biodefense strategy plan that aims to establish global testing capabilities for a new pathogen within 12 hours, implement rapid testing within 1 week, develop pathogen-specific testing within 30 days, release a new specific vaccine within 100 days, manufacture enough doses for each country within 130 days, and ensure availability for high-risk populations worldwide within 200 days. In addition, the plan aims to repurpose existing drugs for the new pathogen within 90 days and develop new therapeutic options within 180 days6. Although developing such capabilities will require significant investment in both facilities and human resources, doing so can save immense value and an immeasurable number of human lives worldwide. The continuing presence of COVID-19 and the latent potential for pathogenic evolution mean that the occurrence of another catastrophic pandemic is not outside the realm of possibility. Preventing such a situation necessitates thorough early preparation and far-reaching foresight in a spirit of global preparedness and togetherness6. It is crucial to have robust global-level preparedness metrics, comprehensive health education, and nationwide community engagement to enforce preventive measures and avoid crowded gatherings. Caution should be exercised regarding the consumption of and interaction with wild animals to prevent the spread of unforeseen zoonotic diseases. In addition, revitalizing public health, strong global health care, and community resilience are essential in effectively responding to health threats and building trust in global health care and public services7. Ethical approval Not applicable. Sources of funding None. Author contributions All authors contributed equally to the writing of this article, and have read and approved the final draft. Conflict of interest disclosures The authors declare that they have no financial conflict of interest with regard to the content of this report. Research registration unique identifying number (UIN) NA. Guarantor Okesanya Olalekan John.