Abstract:Background: Early results have illustrated the multiportal robotic approach to be safe and oncologically efficacious in the treatment of thoracic malignancies. Industry leaders have improved upon the lessons learned during the early multiportal studies and have now come to establish the feasibility of the biportal, and subsequently the uniportal robotic-assisted approach, all in an effort to offer patients equivalent or better outcomes with less surgical trauma. No current, coherent body of evidence currently exists outlining the early-term outcomes of patients undergoing uniportal robotic-assisted thoracic surgery. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to clarify the early-phase outcomes of these patients. Methods: An electronic search of four databases was performed to identify relevant studies outlining the immediate post-operative outcomes of patients undergoing uniportal robotic-assisted thoracic surgeries. The primary endpoint was defined as technical success (i.e., no conversion to secondary robotic, video-assisted thoracoscopic, or open approaches). Secondary endpoints of interest included post-operative outcomes and complication rates. A meta-analysis using a random effects model of proportions or means was applied, as appropriate. Results: The search strategy ultimately yielded 12 relevant studies for inclusion. A total of 240 patients (52% male) split across cohort studies and case reports were identified. The mean age of the two groups was 59.7±3.0 and 58.1±6.8 years, respectively. The mean operative time was 133.8±38.2 and 150.0±52.2 minutes, respectively. Length of hospital stay was 4.4±1.6 and 4.3±1.1 days, respectively. The mean blood loss was 80.0±25.1 mL The majority of identified procedures were lobectomies, segmentectomies, and wedge resections, though complex sleeve resections and anterior mediastinal mass resections were also completed. Cumulative technical success was 99.9%. Conclusions: The uniportal robotic-assisted approach, when completed in expert hands, has been illustrated to have exceedingly low rates of conversion to secondary procedures, along with short length of stay (LOS), minimal blood loss, and short procedural times (variable depending on operation type). Current evidence on the feasibility of this approach will be bolstered by upcoming multi-institutional series.

EP07.03-12 Early PROs after Uniportal Thoracoscopic Lobectomy Vs Da Vinci Robotic-assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectom

Comparison of Early Postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes after Multiportal Robotic-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Early patient‐reported outcomes after robotic‐assisted versus video‐assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy

Early Outcomes of Robotic Versus Thoracoscopic Segmentectomy for Early-Stage Lung Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Initial Experience of Da Vinci Robotic Thoracic Surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University.

EP07.03-16 Early PROs after Thoracoscopic Segmentectomy Versus Wedge Resection for Small-sized Peripheral NSCLC

Clinical Outcomes Following an Initial Experience with a Novel Powered Vascular Stapler in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomies: Results of a Chinese Multi-Center Study

Hybrid uniportal robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery staplers: technical aspects and results

Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: Zhongshan experience

The perioperative outcomes of uniportal robotic-assisted thoracic surgeries-a systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical cohort studies and case reports

A uniportal right upper lobectomy by three-arm robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery using the da Vinci (Xi) Surgical System in the treatment of early-stage lung cancer

Early outcomes of robotic versus uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer: a propensity score-matched study

Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Versus Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

A prospective study examining the impact of uniportal video‐assisted thoracic surgery on the short‐term quality of life in patients with lung cancer

Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery: Robot-Assisted Versus Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Patient-Reported Outcomes of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Versus Thoracotomy for Locally Advanced Lung Cancer: A Longitudinal Cohort Study

Uniportal Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy: Primary Experience from an Eastern Center.

Safety and perioperative outcomes of uniportal versus multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

A comparison of three-port and four-port Da Vinci robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer: a retrospective study

Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Surgery for the Treatment of Lung Cancer Compared to a Conventional Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) Technique.

Effect of da Vinci robot-assisted versus traditional thoracoscopic bronchial sleeve lobectomy