Formal Versus Informal Pathways to Mental Health Care in China

K. B. Brewer,R. E. Gearing,M. Cheung,P. Leung,L. C. Carr,S. Savani,Y. Ma,W. Chen,X. He
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17525098.2023.2252913
2024-01-01
China Journal of Social Work
Abstract:The reported 20% prevalence rate of diagnosable mental illnesses in China might be underestimated due to individuals’ hesitation to report mental health problems. This study tested whether a person’s mental health diagnosis would lead to endorsement and preference for professional care. A community-based survey was conducted in Shanghai, China (n = 466). A structural model showed that 68.8% of the respondents endorsed professional help. Male respondents had a lower endorsement rate for individuals diagnosed with substance use compared to PTSD, suicide, or schizophrenia. Female respondents showed a higher endorsement rate on formal care for schizophrenia compared to PTSD or depression. In the models between health and mental health care, 34% of the respondents endorsed health care, whereas 46% of the respondents endorsed mental health care, with helping-seeking attitudes and age being significant covariates. In China, resources allocated to public education may improve acceptance of professional pathways to mental health care.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?