Abstract:Background: Molecular profiling of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has shown some prognostic utility in the clinic. However, there is still an incomplete understanding of the diversity of molecular mechanisms by which DCIS progresses to invasive breast cancer (IBC).Here, we utilize integrative multi-omic profiling of co-occurring DCIS and IBC in humans as a model for mapping the relationship between tumor mutations, global gene expression and morphological changes in DCIS and IBC. Methods: We performed targeted panel DNA sequencing (Tempus xT), whole transcriptome profiling and hyperplex immunofluorescence (Lunaphore COMET) on a cohort of 39 pairs of co-occurring DCIS and IBC lesions. We performed an integrative analysis of the above multi-modal data to uncover similar and dissimilar molecular trajectories in DCIS/IBC pairs. DAVID, KEGG and Reactome databases were utilized to analyze differential pathway activity between DCIS and IBC lesions. Results: IBC samples significantly overexpressed pathways associated with cycling cells and proliferation. For DCIS, many of the enriched pathways were related to CYP enzymes and xenobiotic metabolism. We also assessed enrichment of specific transcription factor binding sites (TFBS) with the associated differentially expressed genes. The top site enriched in IBC was a promoter regulatory element of unknown function (M120 motif KRCTCNNNNMANAGC) as well as sites regulated by heat shock transcription factor 4 (HSF4). Top TFBS enriched in DCIS included MEF2, HMEF2, AR and CEBPE. The top pathways associated with IBC using DAVID were related to extracellular matrix (ECM) organization and regulation. Interestingly, the top pathways associated with DCIS also included several pathways associated with ECM organization. On Reactome pathways diagrams for ECM formation distinct components of ECM formation and organization were enriched in IBC vs DCIS lesions, with invadopodia formation components and proteoglycans specifically enriched in IBC and integrin/laminin signaling enriched in DCIS. Among the 39 cases profiled, we observed distinct patterns of DCIS/IBC pairs with highly similar mutational profiles indicative of derivation from a shared progenitor as well as pairs with little-to-no molecular concordance that likely arose independently. Even within mutationally similar DCIS/IBC pairs there were different degrees of gene expression concordance. We subdivided mutationally similar pairs into two groups based on gene expression similarity (Euclidean Distance) and identified 115 genes that differed between these groups (q < 0.05), with the dissimilar DCIS lesions hallmarked by upregulation of a variety of pathways related to B-cell function, complement cascade and cell cycle progression. Specific mutations also were related to conserved transcriptional programs in these lesions, with MCL-1 amplified tumors showing a common gene expression signature of 357 altered genes (q < 0.05) with key differences in extracellular matrix organization and adaptive immune response pathways. Dissimilarly, tumors with CKS1B copy number alterations associated with 627 differentially expressed genes (q < 0.05) with the top targets related to endothelial function and angiogenesis. Conclusions: Integrative multi-modal analysis helps us better understand tumor progression at multiple levels of biomolecular dysregulation and shows the complex interplay among genome alterations, gene expression reprogramming and tissue morphology. Such approaches may yield future biomarker signatures that better encapsulate the diverse mechanisms by which DCIS lesions evolve. Citation Format: Henry Kaplan, Alexa Dowdell, Racheli Ben Shimoli, Angela Crabtree, Ann Berry, Fred Robinson, Christopher Carney, Carlo Bifulco, Brian Piening. Mapping inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity in Ductal Carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer using integrative multi-omic profiling [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl) nr PO3-24-01.

Supplementary Figure S4 from Whole-Exome Sequencing Analysis of the Progression from Non–Low-Grade Ductal Carcinoma in Situ to Invasive Ductal Carcinoma

Supplementary Figure S1 from Whole-Exome Sequencing Analysis of the Progression from Non–Low-Grade Ductal Carcinoma <i>In Situ</i> to Invasive Ductal Carcinoma

Supplementary Figure S5 from Whole-Exome Sequencing Analysis of the Progression from Non–Low-Grade Ductal Carcinoma <i>in Situ</i> to Invasive Ductal Carcinoma

Whole-Exome Sequencing Analysis of the Progression from Non-Low-Grade Ductal Carcinoma in Situ to Invasive Ductal Carcinoma.

Supplementary Table S2 from Whole-Exome Sequencing Analysis of the Progression from Non–Low-Grade Ductal Carcinoma <i>In Situ</i> to Invasive Ductal Carcinoma

Supplementary Methods from Whole-Exome Sequencing Analysis of the Progression from Non–Low-Grade Ductal Carcinoma in Situ to Invasive Ductal Carcinoma

Clinicopathological Features of Breast Cancer Progression: from DCIS to Invasive Ductal Carcinoma

Single Cell Expression Analysis of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Identifies Complex Genotypic-Phenotypic Relationships Altering Epithelial Composition

Single Cell Expression Analysis of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Identifies Alterations in Epithelial Integrity

Abstract A038: Evaluating DCIS progression: A comparative analysis of CNA predictive power derived from lpWGS and WES data

Abstract 125: Archival single cell sequencing reveals persistent subclones over years to decades of DCIS progression

Evolutionary Measures Show that Recurrence of DCIS is Distinct from Progression to Breast Cancer

Multi-omic profiling of simultaneous ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer

Molecular classification and biomarkers of clinical outcome in breast ductal carcinoma in situ: Analysis of TBCRC 038 and RAHBT cohorts

Supplementary Figure 1 from Concordance of Genomic Alterations Between Primary and Recurrent Breast Cancer

Supplementary Figures 1 Through 7, Supplementary Methods from Immune Escape in Breast Cancer During in Situ to Invasive Carcinoma Transition

Supplementary Figures 1 Through 3 from Inhibition of the Transition of Ductal Carcinoma <i>in Situ</i> to Invasive Ductal Carcinoma by a Gemini Vitamin D Analog

Clonality analysis of intraductal proliferative lesions in the mammary gland

Supplementary Figure S1 from Intratumoral Heterogeneity in a <i>Trp53</i>-Null Mouse Model of Human Breast Cancer

Abstract PO3-24-01: Mapping inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity in Ductal Carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer using integrative multi-omic profiling

Ductal carcinoma in situ develops within clonal fields of mutant cells in morphologically normal ducts