The DOE E3SM coupled model version 1: Overview and evaluation at standard resolution
Jean‐Christophe Golaz,Peter M. Caldwell,Luke P. Van Roekel,Mark R. Petersen,Qi Tang,Jonathan D. Wolfe,Guta Abeshu,Valentine Anantharaj,Xylar S. Asay‐Davis,David C. Bader,Sterling A. Baldwin,Gautam Bisht,Peter A. Bogenschutz,Marcia Branstetter,Michael A. Brunke,Steven R. Brus,Susannah M. Burrows,Philip J. Cameron‐Smith,Aaron S. Donahue,Michael Deakin,Richard C. Easter,Katherine J. Evans,Yan Feng,Mark Flanner,James G. Foucar,Jeremy G. Fyke,Brian M. Griffin,Cécile Hannay,Bryce E. Harrop,Mattthew J. Hoffman,Elizabeth C. Hunke,Robert L. Jacob,Douglas W. Jacobsen,Nicole Jeffery,Philip W. Jones,Noel D. Keen,Stephen A. Klein,Vincent E. Larson,L. Ruby Leung,Hong‐Yi Li,Wuyin Lin,William H. Lipscomb,Po‐Lun Ma,Salil Mahajan,Mathew E. Maltrud,Azamat Mametjanov,Julie L. McClean,Renata B. McCoy,Richard B. Neale,Stephen F. Price,Yun Qian,Philip J. Rasch,J. E. Jack Reeves Eyre,William J. Riley,Todd D. Ringler,Andrew F. Roberts,Erika L. Roesler,Andrew G. Salinger,Zeshawn Shaheen,Xiaoying Shi,Balwinder Singh,Jinyun Tang,Mark A. Taylor,Peter E. Thornton,Adrian K. Turner,Milena Veneziani,Hui Wan,Hailong Wang,Shanlin Wang,Dean N. Williams,Phillip J. Wolfram,Patrick H. Worley,Shaocheng Xie,Yang Yang,Jin‐Ho Yoon,Mark D. Zelinka,Charles S. Zender,Xubin Zeng,Chengzhu Zhang,Kai Zhang,Yuying Zhang,Xue Zheng,Tian Zhou,Qing Zhu,J.E. Jack Reeves Eyre,Philip J. Wolfram
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001603
IF: 8.469
2019-10-07
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Abstract:This work documents the first version of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) new Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SMv1). We focus on the standard resolution of the fully‐coupled physical model designed to address DOE mission‐relevant water cycle questions. Its components include atmosphere and land (110km grid spacing), ocean and sea ice (60km in the mid‐latitudes and 30km at the equator and poles), and river transport (55km) models. This base configuration will also serve as a foundation for additional configurations exploring higher horizontal resolution as well as augmented capabilities in the form of biogeochemistry and cryosphere configurations. The performance of E3SMv1 is evaluated by means of a standard set of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Characterization of Klima (CMIP6 DECK) simulations consisting of a long pre‐industrial control, historical simulations (ensembles of fully coupled and prescribed SSTs) as well as idealized CO 2 forcing simulations. The model performs well overall with biases typical of other CMIP‐class models, although the simulated Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation is weaker than many CMIP‐class models. While the E3SMv1 historical ensemble captures the bulk of the observed warming between pre‐industrial (1850) and present‐day, the trajectory of the warming diverges from observations in the second half of the 20th century with a period of delayed warming followed by an excessive warming trend. Using a two‐layer energy balance model, we attribute this divergence to the model's strong aerosol‐related effective radiative forcing (ERF ari+aci = ‐1.65 W m ‐2 ) and high equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS = 5.3 K). The United States Department of Energy funded the development of a new state‐of‐the‐art Earth system model for research and applications relevant to its mission. The Energy Exascale Earth System Model version 1 (E3SMv1) consists of five interacting components for the global atmosphere, land surface, ocean, sea ice and rivers. Three of these components (ocean, sea ice and river) are new and have not been coupled into an Earth system model previously. The atmosphere and land surface components were created by extending existing components part of the Community Earth System Model, Version 1. E3SMv1's capabilities are demonstrated by performing a set of standardized simulation experiments described by the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Characterization of Klima (CMIP6 DECK) protocol at standard horizontal spatial resolution of approximately 1 degree latitude and longitude. The model reproduces global and regional climate features well compared to observations. Simulated warming between 1850 and 2015 matches observations, but the model is too cold by about 0.5°C between 1960 and 1990 and later warms at a rate greater than observed. A thermodynamic analysis of the model's response to greenhouse gas and aerosol radiative affects may explain the reasons for the discrepancy.
meteorology & atmospheric sciences