Endoscopic Hand Suturing As a New Technique for Healing of the Post-Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Wound

Yunlei Wei,Jian Tang,Feng Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2021.09.002
IF: 10.396
2022-01-01
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Abstract:We read with interest the article by Akimoto et al.1Akimoto T. Goto O. Sasaki M. et al.Endoscopic suturing promotes healing of mucosal defects after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: endoscopic and histologic analyses in in vivo porcine models (with video).Gastrointest Endosc. 2020; 91: 1172-1182Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (27) Google Scholar Although this study gave us many meaningful findings, we still have some concerns. First is the standard for measuring the size of the defects. The size was measured with the 2-cm plate, and the authors compared the widths of the mucosal defects to evaluate the macroscopic healing speed. A clinical study showed that 24 polyps (66.7%) were accurately measured with the graduated biopsy forceps for 36 polyps between 1 and 2 cm.2Jin H.Y. Leng Q. Use of disposable graduated biopsy forceps improves accuracy of polyp size measurements during endoscopy.World J Gastroenterol. 2015; 21: 623-628Crossref PubMed Scopus (16) Google Scholar Therefore, the pathologists' polyp size measurements could be used in trials and to record the size of each piece of surgical tissue, and if there is no statistical difference, the defect widths can be the standard. Additionally, building on findings in a porcine model,3Wang Z.J. Li S.Y. Zhang Y.H. et al.Endoscopic closure of large colonic perforations with a novel endoscopic clip device: an animal study (with videos).J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019; 34: 2152-2157Crossref PubMed Scopus (5) Google Scholar a pilot human study used newly designed closure clips for closure of giant GI perforations >2 cm in diameter.4Liu Y.P. Li X. Fang J. et al.A pilot human study on newly designed closure clips in endoscopic closure of giant gastrointestinal perforation using a continuous closing method.Surg Endosc. 2021; 35: 5852-5856Crossref PubMed Scopus (2) Google Scholar The average closure time was 14.0 minutes, but the median procedure time of endoscopic hand suturing (EHS) was 26.5 minutes. As we know, EHS is a complex technique that requires endoscopists who have had experience with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and EHS. EHS may be superior to other methods for healing in wounds of other sizes.5Goto O. Sasaki M. Akimoto T. et al.Endoscopic hand-suturing for defect closure after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: a pilot study in animals and in humans.Endoscopy. 2017; 49: 792-797Crossref PubMed Scopus (30) Google Scholar At last, this study included only 2 pigs. In each pig's stomach, the experimental and control groups were fixed to 1 side, although the 2 pigs had anterior and posterior wall control. Therefore, the results were too much influenced by each pig itself, and it would have been better to do a random distribution of the experimental and control groups in each pig's stomach. Nevertheless, we agree with the authors’ caution about the effect of EHS on the healing of the post-ESD wound, and we share the goal of developing easy and convenient methods for the healing of post-ESD gastric mucosal defects for different lesions in future studies. All authors disclosed no financial relationships. Endoscopic suturing promotes healing of mucosal defects after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: endoscopic and histologic analyses in in vivo porcine models (with video)Gastrointestinal EndoscopyVol. 91Issue 5PreviewEndoscopic suturing of mucosal defects after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is expected to prevent postoperative adverse events. We aimed to endoscopically and histologically evaluate the healing process of post-ESD mucosal defects closed with endoscopic hand suturing (EHS) in in vivo porcine models. Full-Text PDF ResponseGastrointestinal EndoscopyVol. 95Issue 2PreviewWe appreciate the valuable comments made by Wei et al1 about our animal experiments in endoscopic hand suturing (EHS) for mucosal defects after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).2 They first discussed the measuring method of the mucosal defect size. When creating the simulating lesions, we placed markings around a 2-cm plastic plate, which were put on the gastric mucosa, and we removed the mucosa surrounded by these markings. Although we did not measure the precise size of the retrieved specimens, we are convinced that the mucosal defects created by the abovementioned manner should be identical in size. Full-Text PDF
What problem does this paper attempt to address?