Abstract:HomePlant DiseaseVol. 106, No. 3Complete Genome Resource of a Commonly Used Laboratory Substrain of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae PXO99A PreviousNext RESOURCE ANNOUNCEMENT OPENOpen Access licenseComplete Genome Resource of a Commonly Used Laboratory Substrain of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae PXO99AYiming Li, Xue Dan, Tianjiao Li, Qiaozhi Wu, Zihao Wang, Lidan Xu, Xiuguo Ma, Fengzhi Bie, Shimin Lei, Sheng Huang, Wei Jiang, and Yong-Qiang HeYiming LiNational Demonstration Center for Experimental Plant Science Education, College of Agriculture, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, Guangxi, ChinaState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresources and College of Life Science and Technology, 100 Daxue Road, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, ChinaSearch for more papers by this author, Xue DanNational Demonstration Center for Experimental Plant Science Education, College of Agriculture, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, Guangxi, ChinaSearch for more papers by this author, Tianjiao LiNational Demonstration Center for Experimental Plant Science Education, College of Agriculture, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, Guangxi, ChinaState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresources and College of Life Science and Technology, 100 Daxue Road, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, ChinaSearch for more papers by this author, Qiaozhi WuState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresources and College of Life Science and Technology, 100 Daxue Road, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, ChinaSearch for more papers by this author, Zihao WangState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresources and College of Life Science and Technology, 100 Daxue Road, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, ChinaSearch for more papers by this author, Lidan XuState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresources and College of Life Science and Technology, 100 Daxue Road, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, ChinaSearch for more papers by this author, Xiuguo MaNational Demonstration Center for Experimental Plant Science Education, College of Agriculture, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, Guangxi, ChinaSearch for more papers by this author, Fengzhi BieState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresources and College of Life Science and Technology, 100 Daxue Road, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, ChinaSearch for more papers by this author, Shimin LeiNational Demonstration Center for Experimental Plant Science Education, College of Agriculture, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, Guangxi, ChinaSearch for more papers by this author, Sheng HuangState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresources and College of Life Science and Technology, 100 Daxue Road, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, ChinaSearch for more papers by this author, Wei Jiang†Corresponding authors: Y.-Q. He; E-mail Address: yqhe@gxu.edu.cn, and W. Jiang; E-mail Address: weijiang@gxu.edu.cnState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresources and College of Life Science and Technology, 100 Daxue Road, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, ChinaSearch for more papers by this author, and Yong-Qiang He†Corresponding authors: Y.-Q. He; E-mail Address: yqhe@gxu.edu.cn, and W. Jiang; E-mail Address: weijiang@gxu.edu.cnhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6803-0431National Demonstration Center for Experimental Plant Science Education, College of Agriculture, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, Guangxi, ChinaState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresources and College of Life Science and Technology, 100 Daxue Road, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, ChinaSearch for more papers by this author AffiliationsAuthors and Affiliations Yiming Li1 2 Xue Dan1 Tianjiao Li1 2 Qiaozhi Wu2 Zihao Wang2 Lidan Xu2 Xiuguo Ma1 Fengzhi Bie2 Shimin Lei1 Sheng Huang2 Wei Jiang2 † Yong-Qiang He1 2 † 1National Demonstration Center for Experimental Plant Science Education, College of Agriculture, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, Guangxi, China 2State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresources and College of Life Science and Technology, 100 Daxue Road, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, China Published Online:8 Mar 2022https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-10-21-2176-AAboutSectionsView articlePDFSupplemental ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailWechat View articleGenome AnnouncementThe phytopathogenic bacterium Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae is the causal agent of rice bacterial leaf blight (BB), one of the most destructive rice diseases in major rice-growing regions worldwide (Niño-Liu et al. 2006). The interactions between X. oryzae pv. oryzae and the rice plant follow the gene-for-gene hypothesis to some extent, making the X. oryzae pv. oryzae–rice pathosystem an excellent model platform in plant sciences (Zhang and Wang 2013). Among the identified X. oryzae pv. oryzae strains, PXO99A, also known as Philippine race 6, is widely acknowledged as the most representative type strain of X. oryzae pv. oryzae and important for differentiating X. oryzae pv. oryzae strains in laboratories and in rice disease resistance breeding. In 2008, Salzburg and his colleagues published the first version of the complete genome of PXO99A, which contains a unique, near-perfect tandem repeat of 212 kb close to the replication terminus (Salzburg et al. 2008). In 2015, Booher and his colleagues confirmed that there are two genomic structures in the progenies from the original PXO99A, with or without the 212-kb duplication, by using long-range sequencing and specific PCR verification (Booher et al. 2015). The genome of the PXO99A duplication version, designated the PXO99A-s accession, has widely been used as a benchmarking reference genome in relevant research around the world (Booher et al. 2015; Salzburg et al. 2008). In 2010, we obtained a substrain of PXO99A, named X. oryzae pv. oryzae PXO99A-GX (shortened to GX99), from the College of Plant Protection at Nanjing Agriculture University, the first institute which had imported the strain PXO99A used in China. In our mutational gene manipulations in PXO99A-GX, we found that the phenotypic changes in mutants of genes in the putative 212-kb duplication region had no significant differences from that of the genes in the other genomic regions (data not shown), which suggested that PXO99A-GX is not a PXO99A-s accession (Booher et al. 2015). In order to clarify the relationship between this substrain and the original strain PXO99A, we sequenced the complete genome of PXO99A-GX using PacBio and Illumina sequencing.X. oryzae pv. oryzae PXO99A-GX was grown in PSG medium (peptone at 10 g liter−1, sucrose at 10 g liter−1, and glutamic acid at 1 g liter−1) for 36 h, about to the early stationary phase. Genomic DNA was isolated using HiPure Bacterial DNA Kits (Magen, Guangzhou, China). The quality of the isolated genomic DNA was assessed using Qubit and Nanodrop accordingly and was fragmented with G-tubes. The fragment size (>10 kb) was selected by blue pippin system to prepare SMRTbell DNA template libraries. DNA sequencing was performed on the Pacific Biosciences Sequel (PacBio, Menlo Park, CA, U.S.A.) by Genedenovo Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, China). In all, 145,826 reads and 1,162,120,421 bp were obtained and the N50 length was 9,258 bp. Sequencing depth of PXO99A-GX was around 230×. Continuous long reads obtained from SMRT sequencing were assembled de novo using Hifiasm software (version 0.16.0) (Cheng et al. 2021). The reads from the Illumina platform were used to correct the genome sequences to improve the quality of the assembly by Pilon software (version 1.23) (Walker et al. 2014). A circular chromosome of 5,028,051 bp (Fig. 1) was attained with 63.65% G+C content. The genome completeness and contamination were evaluated by CheckM v1.1.3 (Parks et al. 2015). The genome annotation of PXO99A-GX was carried out by the NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline (Tatusova et al. 2016) and GeneMarkS-2 software (Lomsadze et al. 2018). In total, 4,493 protein coding genes, 6 ribosomal RNAs, 53 transfer RNAs, and 147 soluble RNAs were predicted by the pipeline (Table 1).Fig. 1. Comparison of genomic structures and transcription activator-like (tal) gene clusters between Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae strains PXO99A and PXO99A-GX. Block diagram showing the syntenic relationships between two genomes. The white sector is the 210-kb duplication present in PXO99A but absent in PXO99A-GX. The tal gene clusters were mapped to the genomes according to their relative positions on each chromosome.Download as PowerPointTable 1. Comparison of the genomic features of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae strains PXO99A and PXO99A-GXGenome featuresPXO99APXO99A-GXPXO86IXO1088AccessionyNC_010717.2CP073820.1NZ_CP007166.1NZ_CP040687.1Genome size (bp)5,238,5555,028,0515,016,6235,093,052G+C content (%)63.6063.6563.7263.67Coding density (%)86.7086.4586.7986.49Genes4,8774,6994,6724,758 Coding sequences (CDSs)4,6664,4934,4704,554 Transfer RNA54535353 Ribosomal RNA6666 Noncoding RNA151147143145 TALE genesz19171819 Average CDS length (bp)957953957950 Pseudogenes759737720745yGenome data of the other X. oryzae pv. oryzae strains in this table were obtained from NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/).zTALE = transcription activator-like effector.Table 1. Comparison of the genomic features of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae strains PXO99A and PXO99A-GXView as image HTML Comparative genomic analysis between X. oryzae pv. oryzae strains PXO99A-s and PXO99A-GX showed that both chromosome structures shared good collinearity, seemingly identical if the PXO99A-s duplication was removed from the genome of PXO99A (Booher et al. 2015). In total, there are 43 sites of genomic variations, including 8 single-nucleotide polymorphisms and 35 insertion-deletions (Supplementary Table S1), which resulted in 210,504 bp and 178 fewer genes in PXO99A-GX than in PXO99 A (Table 1). Of the genomic variation sites, 16 were found in the intergenic regions and 25 in the protein coding genes. Most of the annotated genes in PXO99A-GX had identical allelic counterparts in PXO99A, and even the pseudogenes in PXO99A-GX mostly kept the same mutated sites as those in PXO99A. Transcription activator-like effectors (TALEs) are the most important virulence factors in X. oryzae pv. oryzae, which act as transcription factors in the plant cells by binding to certain DNA targets (Moscou and Bogdanove 2009). The tal genes for TALEs consist of highly repetitive DNA sequences, which are presumed to be highly dynamic, involving recombination and deletions (Erkes et al. 2017). To our surprise, PXO99A-GX encodes 17 tal genes which are identical to the orthologs in PXO99A, except for the 2 tal genes in the duplication region, with no one alteration in the repeat variable diresidue sequence in the reciprocal TALEs (Grau et al. 2016) (Table 2). Because the sequenced sample of PXO99A-GX has been kept at −80°C in an ultralow temperature refrigerator, it is tempting to attribute the genome stability to the infrequent subculturing, which posed few stresses or selection pressures on PXO99A-GX. Although the genome sizes of the two genomes are significantly distinct, PXO99A has only three strain-specific genes, including PXO_RS12260, which encodes an atypical TALE (Supplementary Tables S1 and S2); and PXO99A-GX has one unique gene (i.e., KFK26_14970), which encodes a dipeptidylpeptidase IV N-terminal domain-containing protein (Supplementary Table S1). Assays on the impacts of the genomic variations on the biological traits in PXO99A-GX are in process.Table 2. Repeat variable diresidue (RVD) sequences in transcription activator-like effectors (TALEs) of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae strains PXO99A-GX and PXO99AClassaPXO99A-GXPXO99AFunctionsRVD sequencesTalBMtal1tal1pthXo7NI NG NI NI N* NN HD HD N* NI NI NI NG HD HG NN NS NN HD HD NG N*TalBXtal2btal2bpthXo1NN HD NI HG HD NG N* HD HD NI NG NG NI HD NG NN NG NI NI NI NI N* NS N*TalAGtal2atal2a−NI NG NN NG NK NG NI NN NI NN NI HD N* NS N*TalAWtal3atal3aiTalNS HD NG NG NG HD HD NG HD NN NG HD NN HD NG HD NI N*TalAItal3btal3biTalNS HD NG NG NG NG NG HD HD HD NN HD NG HD HD HD HD N*TalAFtal4tal4−NI NN NN NI NI NI HD NS HG NN NN NN NI NI HG HDTalARtal5btal5b−NI H* NI NN NN NN NN NN HD NI HD HG HD NI N* NS NI NI HG HD NS NS NGTalBAtal5atal5a−NI NS HD HG NS NN HD H* NG NN NN HD HD NG HD NGTalAHtal6atal6apthXo6NI N* NI NS NN NG NN NS N* NS NN NS N* NI HG HD NI HD HD NGTalANtal6btal6b−NI HG NI HG NI NI NI HD NN HD NS NG SS HD NI NI NN NI NN NI NGTalAB−tal7a−NI HG NI NI NI NN HD NS NN NS NN HD NN NI HD NN NS NG−tal7b−NI HG NI NN NGTalABtal7atal8a−NI HG NI NI NI NN HD NS NN NS NN HD NN NI HD NN NS NGTalAAtal7btal8b−NI HG NS HG HG HD NS NG HD NN NG HG NG HD HG HD HD NI NN NGTalAPtal8atal9apthXo8HD HD HD NG N* NN HD HD N* NI NI NN HD HI ND HD NI HD NG NGTalAQtal8btal9bavrXa23HD HD NN NN NG NG HD NS HG HD NG N* HD HD HD N* NN NI NN HD HI ND HD HG NN HG N*TalAOtal8ctal9cavrXa27NI NN N* NG NS NN NN NN NI NN NI N* HD HD NI NG NGTalAEtal8dtal9d−NI NN NI HG HG NV HG HD HG HD HD HD NGTalADtal8etal9e−NN HD NS NG HD NN N* NI HD NS HD NN HD NN HD NN NN NN NN NN NN NN HD NGaTALE classes are based on AnnoTALE (Grau et al. 2016); − indicates no data available.Table 2. Repeat variable diresidue (RVD) sequences in transcription activator-like effectors (TALEs) of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae strains PXO99A-GX and PXO99AView as image HTML In this sequencing project, we have sequenced the complete genome of a substrain of PXO99A—namely, PXO99A-GX—which has been used as the lab strain in many laboratories in China. We speculated that PXO99A-GX is similar to PXO99A-B or PXO99A-L-’13 (Booher et al. 2015), representing a type of genome state of PXO99A derivatives. In addition to the genome of PXO99A-s, the genome of PXO99A-GX might serve as an alternative high-quality reference genome resource to facilitate studies of the X. oryzae pv. oryzae–rice pathosystem.This whole-genome PacBio sequencing project has been deposited in NCBI under the accession number CP073820, with the raw sequencing data at BioProject PRJNA725623 and Sequence Read Archive SRR15390483 and SRR15390484.The author(s) declare no conflict of interest.Literature CitedBooher, N. J., Carpenter, S. C. D., Sebra, R. P., Wang, L., Salzberg, S. L., Leach, J. E., and Bogdanove, A. J. 2015. Single molecule real-time sequencing of Xanthomonas oryzae genomes reveals a dynamic structure and complex TAL (transcription activator-like) effector gene relationships. Microb. Genomics 1:e000032. https://doi.org/10.1099/mgen.0.000032 Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarCheng, H., Concepcion, G. T., Feng, X., Zhang, H., and Li, H. 2021. Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nat. Methods 18:170-175. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-020-01056-5 Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarErkes, A., Reschke, M., Boch, J., and Grau, J. 2017. Evolution of transcription activator-like effectors in Xanthomonas oryzae. Genome Biol. Evol. 9:1599-1615. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evx108 Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarGrau, J., Reschke, M., Erkes, A., Streubel, J., Morgan, R. D., Wilson, G. G., Koebnik, R., and Boch, J. 2016. AnnoTALE: Bioinformatics tools for identification, annotation, and nomenclature of TALEs from Xanthomonas genomic sequences. Sci. Rep. 6:21077. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21077 Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarLomsadze, A., Gemayel, K., Tang, S., and Borodovsky, M. 2018. Modeling leaderless transcription and atypical genes results in more accurate gene prediction in prokaryotes. Genome Res. 28:1079-1089. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.230615.117 Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarMoscou, M. J., and Bogdanove, A. J. 2009. A simple cipher governs DNA recognition by TAL effectors. Science 326:1501. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1178817 Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarNiño-Liu, D. O., Ronald, P. C., and Bogdanove, A. J. 2006. Xanthomonas oryzae pathovars: Model pathogens of a model crop. Mol. Plant Pathol. 7:303-324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2006.00344.x Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarParks, D. H., Imelfort, M., Skennerton, C. T., Hugenholtz, P., and Tyson, G. W. 2015. CheckM: Assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 25:1043-1055. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.186072.114 Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarSalzberg, S. L., Sommer, D. D., Schatz, M. C., Phillippy, A. M., Rabinowicz, P. D., Tsuge, S., Furutani, A., Ochiai, H., Delcher, A. L., Kelley, D., Madupu, R., Puiu, D., Radune, D., Shumway, M., Trapnell, C., Aparna, G., Jha, G., Pandey, A., Patil, P. B., Ishihara, H., Meyer, D. F., Szurek, B., Verdier, V., Koebnik, R., Dow, J. M., Ryan, R. P., Hirata, H., Tsuyumu, S., Lee, S. W., Ronald, P. C., Sonti, R. V., Van Sluys, M.-A., Leach, J. E., White, F. F., and Bogdanove, A. J. 2008. Genome sequence and rapid evolution of the rice pathogen Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae PXO99A. BMC Genomics 9:204. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-204 Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarTatusova, T., DiCuccio, M., Badretdin, A., Chetvernin, V., Nawrocki, E. P., Zaslavsky, L., Lomsadze, A., Pruitt, K. D., Borodovsky, M., and Ostell, J. 2016. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res. 44:6614-6624. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw569 Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarWalker, B. J., Abeel, T., Shea, T., Priest, M., Abouelliel, A., Sakthikumar, S., Cuomo, C. A., Zeng, Q., Wortman, J., Young, S. K., and Earl, A. M. 2014. Pilon: An integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One 9:e112963. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112963 Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarZhang, H., and Wang, S. 2013. Rice versus Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae: A unique pathosystem. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 16:188-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2013.02.008 Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarY. Li and X. Dan contributed equally to this work.Funding: The work is supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFD0200302), the Natural Science Foundation of China (32060600), and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi (2019GXNSFAA245052).The author(s) declare no conflict of interest.DetailsFiguresLiterature CitedRelated Vol. 106, No. 3 March 2022SubscribeISSN:0191-2917e-ISSN:1943-7692 Download Metrics Downloaded 433 times Article History Issue Date: 30 Mar 2022Published: 8 Mar 2022Accepted: 7 Dec 2021 Pages: 1045-1048 Information© 2022 The American Phytopathological SocietyFundingNational Key R&D Program of ChinaGrant/Award Number: 2018YFD0200302Natural Science Foundation of ChinaGrant/Award Number: 32060600Natural Science Foundation of GuangxiGrant/Award Number: 2019GXNSFAA245052KeywordsgenomePacBio sequencingPXO99(^A)substrainXanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzaeThe author(s) declare no conflict of interest.PDF download

Abstract:HomeMolecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®Vol. 35, No. 10Improved Whole Genome Sequence Resource of Phytophthora melonis CJ26, Using Long-Read Nanopore Sequencing Previous RESOURCE ANNOUNCEMENT OPENOpen Access licenseImproved Whole Genome Sequence Resource of Phytophthora melonis CJ26, Using Long-Read Nanopore SequencingShengdan Lu, Jiandong Bao, Zhixin Wang, Zhiting Li, Wanzhen Feng, Chengdong Yang, and Qinghe ChenShengdan LuSanya Nanfan Research Institute, College of Plant Protection, Hainan University, Hainan Yazhou Bay Seed Laboratory, Sanya 572025, ChinaSearch for more papers by this author, Jiandong Baohttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-3423-5118The Institute of Plant Protection and Microbiology, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, ChinaSearch for more papers by this author, Zhixin WangSanya Nanfan Research Institute, College of Plant Protection, Hainan University, Hainan Yazhou Bay Seed Laboratory, Sanya 572025, ChinaSearch for more papers by this author, Zhiting LiSanya Nanfan Research Institute, College of Plant Protection, Hainan University, Hainan Yazhou Bay Seed Laboratory, Sanya 572025, ChinaSearch for more papers by this author, Wanzhen FengSanya Nanfan Research Institute, College of Plant Protection, Hainan University, Hainan Yazhou Bay Seed Laboratory, Sanya 572025, ChinaKey Laboratory of Green Prevention and Control of Tropical Plant Diseases and Pests, Ministry of Education, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, ChinaSearch for more papers by this author, Chengdong YangSanya Nanfan Research Institute, College of Plant Protection, Hainan University, Hainan Yazhou Bay Seed Laboratory, Sanya 572025, ChinaKey Laboratory of Green Prevention and Control of Tropical Plant Diseases and Pests, Ministry of Education, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, ChinaSearch for more papers by this author, and Qinghe Chen†Corresponding author: Q. Chen; E-mail Address: qhchen@hainanu.edu.cnhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-1797-7614Sanya Nanfan Research Institute, College of Plant Protection, Hainan University, Hainan Yazhou Bay Seed Laboratory, Sanya 572025, ChinaKey Laboratory of Green Prevention and Control of Tropical Plant Diseases and Pests, Ministry of Education, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorAffiliationsAuthors and Affiliations Shengdan Lu1 Jiandong Bao2 Zhixin Wang1 Zhiting Li1 Wanzhen Feng1 3 Chengdong Yang1 3 Qinghe Chen1 3 † 1Sanya Nanfan Research Institute, College of Plant Protection, Hainan University, Hainan Yazhou Bay Seed Laboratory, Sanya 572025, China 2The Institute of Plant Protection and Microbiology, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China 3Key Laboratory of Green Prevention and Control of Tropical Plant Diseases and Pests, Ministry of Education, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China Published Online:27 Sep 2022https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-04-22-0096-AAboutSectionsPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailWechat Genome AnnouncementThe oomycete Phytophthora melonis, which was first described by Katsura (1976), is one of the most destructive pathogens of cucumber and other cucurbits, causing damping-off and significantly crop yield reductions worldwide (Erwin and Ribeiro,1996). Symptoms of P. melonis infection include root collar rot, stem lesions, foliar blight and fruit rot, which finally resulting in plant death (Hashemi et al. 2019). The pathogen causes blight, dieback, and crown rot disease (Mirabolfathy et al. 2001) on several economically important crops, such as watermelon (Citrullus lanatus), muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.), wax gourd (Benincasa hispida), zucchini (Cucurbita pepo L.), gourd (Trichosanthes dioica Roxb.), and pistachio (Pistacia vera L.). Despite intensive research efforts made in the past years, there is still no effective cure currently available for this disease and little is known about the molecular and genetic mechanisms governing disease development.Until recently, only one genome assembly of P. melonis CPHST-BL 23 (BL23) (host: Cucumis sativus) has been reported (Srivastava et al. 2020). The genome of strain BL23 was sequenced, using the Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) MinION platform, and was assembled into a 112-Mb genome assembly consisting of 2,091 contigs with N50 of 107 kb (Table 1). To better understand the pathogenicity of P. melonis, more high-quality genome resources of P. melonis were urgently needed.Table 1. Genomic features of Phytophthora melonisFeaturesCJ26CPHST BL 23aOxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) long reads (Gb)6.815.13N50 of ONT reads13,220–Coverage of ONT reads65×50×Illumina short reads (bp)3,945,876,600 (about 38×)–Mapping rate of Illumina short reads96.16%95.29%Assembly size (bp)105,001,437112,010,074Contig number942,091Contig N50 (bp)2,135,025107,148Contig L5016276Maximum contig length (bp)5,998,312720,402GC content (%)54.9254.73Repeat sequence (%)49.0246.46Protein-coding genes29,80134,563Pfamb14,593–GOb7,571–KEGGb5,635–KOGb17,028–Carbohydrate-active enzymesc444–Cytochrome P450 enzymes27–Candidate RXLR effectorsd687–Pathogen-host interaction genes2,010–aPrevious reported genome assembly (National Center for Biotechnology Information accession GCA_008553785.1). A ‘–’ indicates data unavailable.bPfam and GO were annotated with InterProScan V5.52-86.0, and KEGG and KOG were conducted with EggNogMapper V2.cCarbohydrate-active enzymes were annotated by dbCAN2.dRXLR effectors were identified using the open reading frame–based method following our previous study (Wang et al. 2021).Table 1. Genomic features of Phytophthora melonisView as image HTML Here, we isolated a strain, P. melonis CJ26, from infected stems of muskmelon at Changjiang County, Hainan Province, China. This strain was confirmed as P. melonis by combining morphological characteristics and multi-loci phylogenetic analyses based on the sequences of internal transcribed spacer (EU088256.2, 100%), β-tubulin (EF372616.1, 99.79%), and transcription elongation factor (EF372614.1, 99.78%) genes. Colony morphology showed slightly radiate to stellate patterns, with cottony aerial mycelium, on V8 agar plates (200 ml of clarified V8 juice, 800 ml of distilled water, and 20 g of agar). For whole-genome sequencing, high-quality genomic DNA was extracted from the mycelia grown on V8 media. We obtained 6.81 Gb (about 65×; N50 13,220 bp) of long reads, using the ONT PromethION sequencing platform, and 3.95 Gb (about 38×) of 150-bp paired-end short reads (fragment size about 350 bp), using the Illumina HiSeq 3000 sequencing platform (Table 1).The de novo draft genome assembly of strain CJ26 was generated by NextDenovo V2.5.0, using ONT long reads, and was further polished by NextPolish v1.3.1 (Hu et al. 2020), using both ONT long reads and Illumina short reads. Finally, we obtained a 105-Mb polished genome assembly (GC content 54.92%) consisting of 94 contigs (Table 1). The N50 length of contigs was 2.14 Mb (L50 16), while the maximum contig length of this assembly was 6.00 Mb (Table 1). We found that CJ26 has a similar assembly size as BL23 (105 vs. 112 Mb), while with an approximately 95% reduced number of contigs (94 vs. 2,091), approximately 20-fold increased contig N50 (2.14 Mb vs. 107 kb), and approximately eightfold increased maximum contig length (6.00 Mb vs. 720 kb) (Table 1), suggesting significant improvement of the assembly quality.Genome completeness evaluation with BUSCO v5.3.0 (Manni et al. 2021) showed that the genome assembly of strain CJ26 contained 153 (89.47%), 229 (89.80%), and 93 (93.00%) complete single-copy orthologs at alveolata (n = 171), eukaryota (n = 255), and stramenopiles (n = 100) level, respectively (Fig. 1A). The BUSCO genome completeness of strain CJ26 is slightly higher than that of the strain BL23 (Fig. 1A). Genome completeness was also tested by the mapping rate of Illumina short reads, using BWA v0.7.17 (Li et al. 2009). A total of 96.16% of strain CJ26 Illumina short reads were mapped to the CJ26 genome assembly (Table 1). To evaluate genome similarities between CJ26 and BL23, we mapped CJ26 Illumina short reads to BL23 genome assembly, and the mapping rate was up to 95.29%. These results indicate high completeness of the CJ26 genome assembly and high genome similarity with strain BL23.Fig. 1. Comparative genomic analyses between strains CJ26 and CPHST-BL 23 (BL23). A, Genome completeness evaluated by BUSCO v5.3.0 with alveolata, eukaryota, and stramenopiles lineages. B, Whole-genome orthologous gene clusters analysis conducted by OrthoVenn2. The red number in brackets indicates the single-copy orthologous gene clusters. C, Whole-genome collinearity between CJ26 and BL23 using MCScanX and TBtools (shows only the large contigs >1 Mb in CJ26).Download as PowerPointA total of 51.47 Mb (49.02%) repeat sequences was identified in the genome assembly of CJ26 using RepeatMasker v4.1.2 with a de novo repeat library generated by RepeatModeler v2.02 (Table 1). The repeats were mainly enriched with interspersed repeats (49.87 Mb, 96.89%), including 31.97 Mb of long terminal repeats (62.11%), 7.21 Mb of DNA elements (14.01%), and 9.67 Mb of unclassified interspersed repeats (18.79%). The repeat-masked genome assembly was used for gene annotation, and a total of 29,801 protein-coding genes were identified by BRAKER v2.1.6 (Bruna et al. 2021), which integrated gene structure evidence from Augustus v3.4.0 (Stanke et al. 2008) and GeneMark-ET (Bruna et al. 2020) with the available Phytophthora homologous proteins as a training dataset (Table 1). The gene number of strain CJ26 is approximately 16% (29,801 vs. 34,563) lower than strain BL23 annotated using the same gene prediction pipeline.To figure out the genome difference between strains from different host plants, whole-genome orthologs analysis was conducted with OrthoVenn2 (Xu et al. 2019), and the result showed that strains CJ26 and BL23 shared 18,712 (approximately 94%) orthologous gene clusters, among which, 15,810 clusters (approximately 80%) were single-copy orthologs (Fig. 1B). Gene-based genome collinearity analysis using MCScanX (Wang et al. 2012) and TBtools (Chen et al. 2020) showed that strains CJ26 and BL23 not only have high genetic similarity but also high gene synteny (Fig. 1C).Gene functional annotation was conducted with eggNOG-mapper v2.1.6 (Letunic et al. 2021) and InterProScan v5.52-86.0 (Jones et al. 2014) with a set of popular bioinformatic databases including Pfam v33.1, Gene Ontology (GO) release 2021, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) release 100.0, and Eukaryotic Orthologous Groups (KOG), which annotated functions of 14,593, 7,571, 5,635, and 17,028 genes, respectively (Table 1). We also identified a set of pathogenicity-related genes, including 2,010 genes from Pathogen-Host Interaction base (PHI-base) V4.12, 444 carbohydrate-active enzymes detected by dbCAN2 (Lombard et al. 2014), 687 putative RXLR effectors, following our previous open reading frame (ORF)-based pipeline (Wang et al. 2021), and 27 cytochrome P450 enzymes from Pfam annotations (Table 1).Data AvailabilityThe whole-genome assembly and genes reported in this paper have been deposited in the Genome Warehouse (accession number GWHBGBS00000000) at the National Genomics Data Center, China National Center for Bioinformation (CNCB-NGDC Members and Partners 2021). The genome assembly of CJ26 has also been submitted to National Center for Biotechnology Information assembly database (accession number JAMXKT000000000 under BioProject PRJNA847706). The raw sequence reads also are publicly accessible at the CNCB-NGDC Genome Sequence Archive (https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa/) under accession number CRA005555 (BioProject PRJCA007515).Author-Recommended Internet ResourcesBUSCO v5.3.0 data: https://busco-data.ezlab.org/v5/dataGenome Sequence Archive: https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsaGenome Warehouse: https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gwhGO database: http://geneontology.orgNextDenovo V2.5.0: https://github.com/NextomicsKEGG database: https://www.genome.jp/keggKOG database: https://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/pub/COG/KOGPfam database: https://pfam.xfam.orgPHI-base: http://www.phi-base.orgRepeatMasker v4.1.2: http://www.repeatmasker.org/RepeatModeler v2.02: http://www.repeatmasker.org/RepeatModelerThe author(s) declare no conflict of interest.Literature CitedBruna, T., Hoff, K. J., Lomsadze, A., Stanke, M., and Borodovsky, M. 2021. BRAKER2: Automatic eukaryotic genome annotation with GeneMark-EP+ and AUGUSTUS supported by a protein database. NAR Genomics Bioinforma. 3:lqaa108. https://doi.org/10.1093/nargab/lqaa108 Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarBruna, T., Lomsadze, A., and Borodovsky, M. 2020. GeneMark-EP+: Eukaryotic gene prediction with self-training in the space of genes and proteins. NAR Genomics Bioinforma. 2:lqaa026. https://doi.org/10.1093/nargab/lqaa026 Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarChen, C., Chen, H., Zhang, Y., Thomas, H. R., Frank, M. H., He, Y., and Xia, R. 2020. TBtools: An integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol Plant. 13:1194-1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2020.06.009 Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google ScholarCNCB-NGDC Members and Partners. 2021. Database resources of the National Genomics Data Center, China National Center for Bioinformation in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 49:D18-D28. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa1022 Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google ScholarErwin, D. C., and Ribeiro, O. K. 1996. Phytophthora Diseases Worldwide. APS Press, St. Paul, MN, U.S.A. Google ScholarHashemi, L., Golparvar, A. Reza., Esfahani, M. N., and Golabadi, M. 2019. Correlation between cucumber genotype and resistance to damping-off disease caused by Phytophthora melonis. Biotechnol. Biotec. Eq. 33:1494-1504. https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2019.1675535 Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarHu, J., Fan, J., Sun, Z., and Liu, S. 2020. NextPolish: A fast and efficient genome polishing tool for long-read assembly. Bioinformatics 36:2253-2255. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz891 Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google ScholarJones, P., Binns, D., Chang, H. Y., Fraser, M., Li, W., McAnulla, C., McWilliam, H., Maslen, J., Mitchell, A., Nuka, G., Pesseat, S., Quinn, A. F., Sangrador-Vegas, A., Scheremetjew, M., Yong, S. Y., Lopez, R., and Hunter, S. 2014. InterProScan 5: Genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics 30:1236-1240. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu031 Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google ScholarKatsura, K. 1976. Two new species of Phytophthora causing damping-off of cucumber and trunk rot of chestnut. Trans. Mycol. Soc. Jap. 17:238-242. Google ScholarLetunic, I., Bork, P., and Huerta-Cepas, J. 2021. eggNOG-mapper v2: Functional annotation, orthology assignments, and domain prediction at the metagenomic scale. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38:5825-5829. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab293 Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google ScholarLi, H., and Durbin, R. 2009. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25:1754-1760. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google ScholarLombard, V., Golaconda Ramulu, H., Drula, E., Coutinho, P. M., and Henrissat, B. 2014. The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 42:D490-D495. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1178 Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google ScholarManni, M., Berkeley, M. R., Seppey, M., Simão, F. A., and Zdobnov, E. M. 2021. BUSCO update: Novel and streamlined workflows along with broader and deeper phylogenetic coverage for scoring of eukaryotic, prokaryotic, and viral genomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38:4647-4654. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab199 Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google ScholarMirabolfathy, M., Cooke, D. E. L., Duncan, J. M., Williams, N. A., Ershad, D., and Alizadeh, A. 2001. Phytophthora pistaciae sp. nov. and P. melonis: The principal causes of pistachio gummosis in Iran. Mycol. Res.105:1166-1175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-7562(08)61987-5 Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarSrivastava, S. K., Abad, Z. G., Knight, L. M., Zeller, K., Mavrodieva, V., and Nakhla, M. 2020. Draft genome resource for the ex-types of Phytophthora ramorum, P. kernoviae, and P. melonis, species of regulatory concern, using ultra-long read MinION nanopore sequencing. Mol. Plant-Microbe In. 33:794-797. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-12-19-0342-A Link, ISI, Google ScholarStanke, M., Diekhans, M., Baertsch, R., and Haussler D. 2008. Using native and syntenically mapped cDNA alignments to improve de novo gene finding. Bioinformatics 24:637-644. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn013 Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google ScholarWang, Y., Tang, H., Debarry, J. D., Tan, X., Li, J., Wang, X., Lee, T. H., Jin, H., Marler, B., Guo, H., Kissinger, J. C., and Paterson, A. H. 2012. MCScanX: A toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 40:e49. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr1293 Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google ScholarWang, Z., Bao, J., Lv, L., Lin, L., Li, Z., Shi, M., Huang, Y., Wang, R., Li, B., Liu, P., and Chen, Q. 2021. Genome sequence resource of Phytophthora colocasiae from China using Nanopore sequencing technology. Plant Dis. 105:4141-4145. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-11-20-2327-A Link, ISI, Google ScholarXu, L., Dong, Z., Fang, L., Luo, Y., Wei, Z., Guo, H., Zhang, G., Gu, Y. Q., Coleman-Derr, D., Xia, Q., and Wang, Y. 2019. OrthoVenn2: A web server for whole-genome comparison and annotation of orthologous clusters across multiple species. Nucleic Acids Res. 47:W52-W58. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz333 Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google ScholarS. Lu and J. Bao contributed equally to this work.Funding: This work was supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (32160614), Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (321CXTD437), the National Key R and D Program (2021YFC2600602), the Major Science and Technology Plan of Hainan Province (ZDKJ2021016), and the Scientific Research Foundation of Hainan University (KYQD(ZR)-20080).The author(s) declare no conflict of interest. The author(s) have dedicated the work to the public domain under the Creative Commons CC0 “No Rights Reserved” license by waiving all of his or her rights to the work worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed by law, 2022.DetailsFiguresLiterature CitedRelated Vol. 35, No. 10 October 2022ISSN:0894-0282e-ISSN:1943-7706 Download Metrics Article History Issue Date: 8 Oct 2022Published: 27 Sep 2022Accepted: 14 Jul 2022 Pages: 959-962 InformationThe author(s) have dedicated the work to the public domain under the Creative Commons CC0 “No Rights Reserved” license by waiving all of his or her rights to the work worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed by law, 2022.Funding National Natural Science Foundation of ChinaGrant/Award Number: 32160614 Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of ChinaGrant/Award Number: 321CXTD437 National Key R and D ProgramGrant/Award Number: 2021YFC2600602 Major Science and Technology Plan of Hainan ProvinceGrant/Award Number: ZDKJ2021016 Scientific Research Foundation of Hainan UniversityGrant/Award Number: KYQD(ZR)-20080 Keywordsgenome assemblylong-read sequencingPhytophthora melonisThe author(s) declare no conflict of interest.PDF download

The Complete Genome Resource of Xanthomonas Axonopodis Pv. Glycines ICMP5732 Causing Pustule Disease on Soybean

Complete Genome Sequence of <i>Xanthomonas phaseoli</i> pv. <i>manihotis</i> Strain CHN01, the Causal Agent of Cassava Bacterial Blight

Complete Genome Resource of a Commonly Used Laboratory Substrain of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae PXO99(A)

Improved Whole Genome Sequence Resource of Phytophthora Melonis CJ26, Using Long-Read Nanopore Sequencing.

High-Quality Genome Resource of Mango Bacterial Black Spot Pathogen Xanthomonas Citri Pv. Mangiferaeindicae GXG07 Isolated from Guangxi, China

Complete sequence and detailed analysis of the first indigenous plasmid from Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzicola

Characterization Ofacinetobacter Johnsoniiisolate XBB1 Carrying Nine Plasmids and Encoding NDM-1, OXA-58 and PER-1 by Genome Sequencing

Genome Sequence of Xanthomonas Campestris Jx, an Industrially Productive Strain for Xanthan Gum

Genomic Sequencing Globally Identifies Functional Genes and Potential Virulence-Related Effectors of Xanthomonas Axonopodis Pv. Malvacearum

Complete Genome Sequence Data of a Newly Isolated Streptomyces violascens Strain A10, a Potential Biological Control Agent for Fungal and Oomycete Diseases

Two New Complete Genome Sequences Offer Insight into Host and Tissue Specificity of Plant Pathogenic Xanthomonas Spp

Genome Sequence Resource of Phomopsis Longicolla YC2-1, a Fungal Pathogen Causing Phomopsis Stem Blight in Soybean.

Responses of Soybean Genes in the Substituted Segments of Segment Substitution Lines Following a Xanthomonas Infection

Refined annotation of the complete genome of the phytopathogenic and xanthan producing Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris strain B100 based on RNA sequence data

Construction of a Genomic Library of Xanthomonas oryzae pv.oryzae Strain GX1329 and Isolation of Clones Containing the Genes Encoding TAL Effectors

Genome Resource of a Hypervirulent Strain C9-3 of Xanthomonas Oryzae Pv. Oryzae Causing Bacterial Blight of Rice.

Gene discovery by genome-wide CDS re-prediction and microarray-based transcriptional analysis in phytopathogen Xanthomonas campestris

Complete Genome Sequence of Xylella taiwanensis and Comparative Analysis of Virulence Gene Content With Xylella fastidiosa

Complete Genomic Map of Xanthomonas oryzae pv.oryzae Strain ZX002 and Its Analysis

Acquisition And Evolution Of Plant Pathogenesis-Associated Gene Clusters And Candidate Determinants Of Tissue-Specificity In Xanthomonas

Whole-genome Sequence and Genome Annotation of Xanthomonas Citri Pv. Mangiferaeindicae , Causal Agent of Bacterial Black Spot on Mangifera Indica