Abstract:No AccessTechnical NoteUnsteady Transition Studies over a Pitching Airfoil Using a k-ω-γ Transition ModelJian Liu, Zhixiang Xiao and Song FuJian LiuTsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, People's Republic of China, Zhixiang XiaoTsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, People's Republic of China and Song FuTsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, People's Republic of ChinaPublished Online:16 May 2018https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J056466SectionsRead Now ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail About References [1] Gleize V., Costes M., Le Pape A. and Richez F., "Numerical Simulation of a Pitching Airfoil Under Dynamic Stall Conditions Including Laminar/Turbulent Transition," AIAA Paper 2008-391, 2008. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2008-391 LinkGoogle Scholar[2] Schreck S. J., Faller W. E. and Helin H. E., "Pitch Rate and Reynolds Number Effects on Unsteady Boundary-Layer Transition and Separation," Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 35, No. 1, 1998, pp. 46–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/2.2258 LinkGoogle Scholar[3] Richter K., Koch S., Gardner A. D., Mai H., Klein A. and Rohardt C. H., "Experimental Investigation of Unsteady Transition on a Pitching Rotor Blade Airfoil," Journal of the American Helicopter Society, Vol. 59, No. 1, 2014, pp. 1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.4050/JAHS.59.012001 JHESAK 0002-8711 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[4] Gao Y. W., Zhu Q. L. and Wang L., "Measurement of Unsteady Transition on a Pitching Airfoil Using Dynamic Pressure Sensors," Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, Vol. 30, No. 10, 2016, pp. 4571–4578. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-016-0928-5 1738-494X CrossrefGoogle Scholar[5] Soltani M. R. and Bakhshalipour A., "Effect of Amplitude and Mean Angle-of-Attack on the Boundary Layer of an Oscillating Aerofoil," The Aeronautical Journal, Vol. 112, No. 1138, 2008, pp. 705–713. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001924000002670 AENJAK 0001-9240 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[6] Richter K., Koch S., Goerttler A., Lütke B., Wolf C. C. and Benkel A., "Unsteady Boundary Layer Transition on the DSA-9A Rotor Blade Airfoil," 41st European Rotorcraft Forum, Munich, Germany, Sept. 2015, pp. 1–4. Google Scholar[7] Raffel M. and Merz C. B., "Differential Infrared Thermography for Unsteady Boundary-Layer Transition Measurements," AIAA Journal, Vol. 52, No. 9, 2014, pp. 2090–2093. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J053235 AIAJAH 0001-1452 LinkGoogle Scholar[8] Raffel M., Merz C. B., Schwermer T. and Richter K., "Differential Infrared Thermography for Boundary Layer Transition Detection on Pitching Rotor Blade Models," Experiments in Fluids, Vol. 56, No. 2, 2015, pp. 1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-015-1905-y EXFLDU 0723-4864 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[9] Nandi T. N., Brasseur J. G. and Vijayakumar G., "Prediction and Analysis of the Nonsteady Transition and Separation Processes on an Oscillating Wind Turbine Airfoil Using the γ−Reθ Transition Model," AIAA Paper 2016-0520, 2016. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-0520 Google Scholar[10] Kaufmann K., Merz C. B. and Gardner A. D., "Dynamic Stall Simulations on a Pitching Finite Wing," Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 54, No. 4, 2017, pp. 1303–1316. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C034020 LinkGoogle Scholar[11] Wang L., Xiao L. H. and Fu S., "A Modular RANS Approach for Modeling Hypersonic Flow Transition on a Scramjet-Forebody Configuration," Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 56, Sept. 2016, pp. 112–124. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2016.07.004 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[12] Liu J., Sun H. S., Huang Y., Jiang Y. and Xiao Z. X., "Numerical Investigation of an Advanced Aircraft Model During Pitching Motion at High Incidence," Science China-Technological Sciences, Vol. 59, No. 2, 2016, pp. 276–288. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-015-5957-2 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[13] Liu J., Luo K. Y., Sun H. S., Huang Y., Liu Z. T. and Xiao Z. X., "Dynamic Response of Vortex Breakdown Flows to a Pitching Double-Delta Wing," Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 72, Jan. 2018, pp. 564–577. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2017.10.008 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[14] Schubauer G. and Klebanoff P., "Contributions on the Mechanics of Boundary Layer Transition," NACA TN 3489, 1955. Google Scholar[15] Zhou L., Yan C., Hao Z. H. and Du R. F., "Improved k-Omega-Gamma Model for Hypersonic Boundary Layer Transition Prediction," International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 94, March 2016, pp. 380–389. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.11.048 IJHMAK 0017-9310 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[16] Xiao Z. X., Liu J., Luo K. Y., Huang J. B. and Fu S., "Investigation of Flows Around a Rudimentary Landing Gear with Advanced Detached-Eddy-Simulation Approaches," AIAA Journal, Vol. 51, No. 1, 2013, pp. 107–125. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J051598 AIAJAH 0001-1452 LinkGoogle Scholar[17] Liou M. S., "A Sequel to AUSM, Part II: AUSM+-up for all Speeds," Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 214, No. 1, 2006, 137–170. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2005.09.020 JCTPAH 0021-9991 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[18] Abbott I. H. and Von Doenhoeff A. E., Theory of Wing Sections, Dover, New York, 1959, Chap. 7. Google Scholar[19] Richter K. and Schulein E., "Boundary-Layer Transition Measurements on Hovering Helicopter Rotors by Infrared Thermography," Experiments in Fluids, Vol. 55, No. 7, 2014, pp. 1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-014-1755-z EXFLDU 0723-4864 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[20] Ericsson L. E., "Dynamic Stall of Pitching Airfoils and Delta Wings, Similarities and Differences," Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 36, No. 3, 1999, pp. 603–605. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/2.2477 LinkGoogle Scholar[21] Ericsson L. E. and Reding J. P., "Unsteady Flow Concepts for Dynamic Stall Analysis," Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 21, No. 8, 1984, pp. 601–606. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45029 LinkGoogle Scholar[22] Ronch A. D., Vallespin D., Ghoreyshi M. and Badcock K. J., "Evaluation of Dynamic Derivatives Using Computational Fluid Dynamics," AIAA Journal, Vol. 50, No. 2, 2012, pp. 470–484. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J051304 AIAJAH 0001-1452 LinkGoogle Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byAssessment of a new hybrid-SSOR implicit temporal scheme for turbulent flows across a wide range of Mach numbers30 January 2023 | Acta Mechanica Sinica, Vol. 39, No. 6Wind Microturbine with Adjustable Blade Pitch Angle14 January 2023 | Energies, Vol. 16, No. 2Computational Fluid Dynamics Transition Models Validation for Rotors in Unsteady Flow ConditionsRohit Jain13 December 2021 | Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 59, No. 4Transition-based constrained large-eddy simulation method with application to an ultrahigh-lift low-pressure turbine cascade flow27 April 2022 | Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 941Dynamic responses of pitching hydrofoil in laminar–turbulent transition regimeJournal of Fluids and Structures, Vol. 111Surface Roughness Effects on Unsteady Transition Property over a Pitching AirfoilJournal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 35, No. 3The transition to turbulence in rarefaction-driven Rayleigh–Taylor mixing: Effects of diffuse interfacePhysics of Fluids, Vol. 34, No. 1Parametric Analysis Using CFD to Study the Impact of Geometric and Numerical Modeling on the Performance of a Small Scale Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine11 January 2022 | Energies, Vol. 15, No. 2Laminar separation bubble dynamics and its effects on thin airfoil performance during pitching-up motion11 March 2021 | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 235, No. 16Uncertainty Analysis of Inflow Parameters for Mid-Lift-to-Drag Vehicle TransitionZaijie Liu , Yuhan Lu and Chao Yan20 July 2021 | AIAA Journal, Vol. 59, No. 10Assessment of a Spalart–Allmaras Model Coupled with Local Correlation Based Transition Approaches for Wind Turbine Airfoils20 February 2021 | Applied Sciences, Vol. 11, No. 4Numerical investigations on transitional flows around forward and reversed hydrofoilsEuropean Journal of Mechanics - B/Fluids, Vol. 85Simultaneous simulation of transition and massive separation by RANS-LES-Tr modelAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 105Simulations of transition and separation past a wind-turbine airfoil near stallEnergy, Vol. 205Transition effects on flow characteristics around a static two-dimensional airfoilPhysics of Fluids, Vol. 32, No. 3Quantification of parametric uncertainty in k–ω–γ transition model for hypersonic flow heat transferAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 96Distributed roughness induced transition on wind-turbine airfoils simulated by four-equation k-ω-γ-Ar transition modelRenewable Energy, Vol. 135DDES with adaptive coefficient for stalled flows past a wind turbine airfoilEnergy, Vol. 161 What's Popular Volume 56, Number 9September 2018 CrossmarkInformationCopyright © 2018 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the ISSN 0001-1452 (print) or 1533-385X (online) to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp. TopicsAerodynamic PerformanceAerodynamicsAeronautical EngineeringAeronauticsBoundary LayersComputational Fluid DynamicsConservation of Momentum EquationsEquations of Fluid DynamicsFinite Volume MethodFlow RegimesFluid DynamicsSkin FrictionTurbulenceVortex Dynamics KeywordsPitching AirfoilDrag CoefficientTransitional FlowNumerical SimulationHysteresis LoopsDynamic ResponseFinite Volume MethodAngle of AttackKinetic EnergyLift Drag RatioAcknowledgmentsThis work is supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFA0401200) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11772174).PDF Received27 June 2017Accepted15 April 2018Published online16 May 2018

Abstract:No AccessTechnical NotesPressure-Sensitive Paint Measurement of a Subsonic Diffuser Controlled by Sweeping JetsXin Wen, Jinsheng Song, Fan Yang, Di Peng and Yingzheng LiuXin WenState Key Laboratory of Aerodynamics, 621000 Mianyang, People’s Republic of China*Associate Professor; also Key Laboratory of Education Ministry for Power Machinery and Engineering, School of Mechanical and Power Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200240 Shanghai, People’s Republic of China.Search for more papers by this author, Jinsheng SongShanghai Jiao Tong University, 200240 Shanghai, People’s Republic of China†Graduate Student, Key Laboratory of Education Ministry for Power Machinery and Engineering, School of Mechanical and Power Engineering.Search for more papers by this author, Fan YangShanghai Jiao Tong University, 200240 Shanghai, People’s Republic of China†Graduate Student, Key Laboratory of Education Ministry for Power Machinery and Engineering, School of Mechanical and Power Engineering.Search for more papers by this author, Di PengShanghai Jiao Tong University, 200240 Shanghai, People’s Republic of China‡Professor, Key Laboratory of Education Ministry for Power Machinery and Engineering, School of Mechanical and Power Engineering.Search for more papers by this author and Yingzheng LiuShanghai Jiao Tong University, 200240 Shanghai, People’s Republic of China§Distinguished Professor, Key Laboratory of Education Ministry for Power Machinery and Engineering, School of Mechanical and Power Engineering; (Corresponding Author)Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:22 Aug 2022https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J061885SectionsRead Now ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail About References [1] Collie W., Burgun R., Heinzen S., Hall C. and Chokani N., “Advanced Propulsion System Design and Integration for a Turbojet Powered Unmanned Aerial Vehicle,” AIAA Paper 2003-0415, 2003. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2003-415 Google Scholar[2] Amici C., Ceresoli F., Pasetti M., Saponi M., Tiboni M. and Zanoni S., “Review of Propulsion System Design Strategies for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles,” Applied Sciences, Vol. 11, No. 11, 2021, Paper 5209. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11115209 Google Scholar[3] Cherry E. M., Elkins C. J. and Eaton J. K., “Geometric Sensitivity of Three-Dimensional Separated Flows,” International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2008, pp. 803–811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2008.01.018 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[4] Ohlsson J., Schlatter P., Fischer P. F. and Henningson D. S., “Direct Numerical Simulation of Separated Flow in a Three-Dimensional Diffuser,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 650, May 2010, p. 307. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112010000558 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[5] Gil-Prieto D., MacManus D. G., Zachos P. K. and Bautista A., “Assessment Methods for Unsteady Flow Distortion in Aero-Engine Intakes,” Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 72, Jan. 2017, pp. 92–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2017.10.029 Google Scholar[6] Zachos P. K., MacManus D. G., Prieto D. G. and Chiereghin N., “Flow Distortion Measurements in Convoluted Aeroengine Intakes,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 54, No. 9, 2016, pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J054904 Google Scholar[7] Zhang B. F., Liu K., Zhou Y., To S. and Tu J. Y., “Active Drag Reduction of a High-Drag Ahmed Body Based on Steady Blowing,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 856, Dec. 2018, pp. 351–396. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2018.703 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[8] Xu Y., Feng L. H. and Wang J. J., “Experimental Investigation of a Synthetic Jet Impinging on a Fixed Wall,” Experiments in Fluids, Vol. 54, No. 5, 2013, Paper 1512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-013-1512-8 Google Scholar[9] Wang J. J., Choi K. S., Feng L. H., Jukes T. N. and Whalley R. D., “Recent Developments in DBD Plasma Flow Control,” Progress in Aerospace Sciences, Vol. 62, Oct. 2013, pp. 52–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2013.05.003 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[10] Corke T. C., Enloe C. L. and Wilkinson S. P., “Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma Actuators for Flow Control,” Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 42, No. 1, 2010, pp. 505–529. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-121108-145550 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[11] Gartner J., Rice T. T. and Amitay M., “Mitigation of Massively Separated Flow in a Three-Dimensional Diffuser,” International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, Vol. 76, April 2019, pp. 242–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2019.01.015 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[12] Burrows T. J., Vukasinovic B. and Glezer A., “Fluidic Control of an Aggressive Offset Diffuser for a Supersonic Inlet,” AIAA Paper 2017-4304, 2017. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2017-4304 Google Scholar[13] Ostermann F., Woszidlo R., Nayeri C. N. and Paschereit C. O., “Properties of a Sweeping Jet Emitted from a Fluidic Oscillator,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 857, Dec. 2018, pp. 216–238. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2018.739 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[14] Woszidlo R., Ostermann F. and Schmidt H. J., “Fundamental Properties of Fluidic Oscillators for Flow Control Applications,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 57, No. 3, 2019, pp. 978–992. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J056775 LinkGoogle Scholar[15] Tomac M. N., “Novel Jet Impingement Atomization by Synchronizing the Sweeping Motion of the Fluidic Oscillators,” Journal of Visualization, Vol. 23, No. 3, 2020, pp. 373–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-020-00632-3 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[16] Lin J. C., Whalen E. A., Andino M. Y., Graff E. C., Lacy D. S., Washburn A. E., Gharib M. and Wygnanski I. J., “Full-Scale Testing of Active Flow Control Applied to a Vertical Tail,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 56, Feb. 2019, pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C034907 Google Scholar[17] Dandois J., Verbeke C. and Ternoy F., “Performance Enhancement of a Vertical Tail Model with Sweeping Jets,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 58, Oct. 2020, pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J059161 Google Scholar[18] Koklu M. and Owens L. R., “Comparison of Sweeping Jet Actuators with Different Flow-Control Techniques for Flow-Separation Control,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 55, No. 3, 2017, pp. 848–860. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J055286 LinkGoogle Scholar[19] Otto C., Tewes P., Little J. C. and Woszidlo R., “Comparison Between Fluidic Oscillators and Steady Jets for Separation Control,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 57, No. 12, 2019, pp. 5220–5229. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J058081 LinkGoogle Scholar[20] Ebert C., Mihalyovics J., Staats M., Peitsch D. and Weiss J., “Numerical and Experimental Investigations for Super Sonic Active Flow Control in the Transsonic Mach Regime,” Conference: Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress 2019, 2020, Paper 490165. https://doi.org/10.25967/490165 Google Scholar[21] Westerweel J., Elsinga G. E. and Adrian R. J., “Particle Image Velocimetry for Complex and Turbulent Flows,” Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 45, No. 1, 2013, pp. 409–436. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-120710-101204 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[22] Lee T., Lee C., Nonomura T. and Asai K., “Unsteady Skin-Friction Field Estimation Based on Global Luminescent Oil-Film Image Analysis,” Journal of Visualization, Vol. 23, No. 5, 2020, pp. 763–772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-020-00661-y CrossrefGoogle Scholar[23] Liu T., Sullivan J. P., Asai K., Klein C. and Egami Y., Pressure and Temperature Sensitive Paints, Springer, Cham, 2021, pp. 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68056-5 Google Scholar[24] Sugioka Y., Hiura K., Chen L., Matsui A., Morita K., Nonomura T. and Asai K., “Unsteady Pressure-Sensitive-Paint (PSP) Measurement in Low-Speed Flow: Characteristic Mode Decomposition and Noise Floor Analysis,” Experiments in Fluids, Vol. 60, No. 7, 2019, p. 108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-019-2755-9 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[25] Gregory J. W., Asai K., Kameda M., Liu T. and Sullivan J. P., “A Review of Pressure-Sensitive Paint for High-Speed and Unsteady Aerodynamics,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G—Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 222, No. 2, 2008, pp. 249–290. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544100JAERO243 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[26] Gregory J. W., Sakaue H., Liu T. and Sullivan J. P., “Fast Pressure-Sensitive Paint for Flow and Acoustic Diagnostics,” Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 46, No. 1, 2014, pp. 303–330. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-010313-141304 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[27] Peng D. and Liu Y., “Fast Pressure-Sensitive Paint for Understanding Complex Flows: From Regular to Harsh Environments,” Experiments in Fluids, Vol. 61, No. 1, 2019, Paper 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-019-2839-6 Google Scholar[28] Tagliabue A., Scharnowski S. and Kähler C. J., “Surface Pressure Determination: A Comparison Between PIV-Based Methods and PSP Measurements,” Journal of Visualization, Vol. 20, No. 3, 2017, pp. 581–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-016-0406-2 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[29] Flaherty W., Reedy T. M., Elliott G. S., Austin J. M., Schmit R. F. and Crafton J., “Investigation of Cavity Flow Using Fast-Response Pressure Sensitive Paint,” 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, AIAA Paper 2013-0678, Jan. 2013. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-678 Google Scholar[30] Huang C. Y., Hu Y. H., Wan S. A. and Nagai H., “Application of Pressure-Sensitive Paint for the Characterization of Mixing with Various Gases in T-Type Micromixers,” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 156, Aug. 2020, Paper 119710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.119710 Google Scholar[31] Gardner A. D., Klein C., Sachs W. E., Henne U., Mai H. and Richter K., “Investigation of Three-Dimensional Dynamic Stall on an Airfoil Using Fast-Response Pressure-Sensitive Paint,” Experiments in Fluids, Vol. 55, Aug. 2014, Paper 1807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-014-1807-4 Google Scholar[32] Jiao L., Chen Y., Wen X., Peng D., Liu Y. and Gregory J. W., “Resolving Vortex-Induced Pressure Fluctuations on a Cylinder in Rotor Wake Using Fast-Responding Pressure-Sensitive Paint,” Physics of Fluids, Vol. 31, No. 5, 2019, Paper 055106. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5092944 Google Scholar[33] Peng D., Xie F., Liu X., Lin J., Li Y., Zhong J., Zhang Q. and Liu Y., “Experimental Study on Hypersonic Shock–Body Interaction Between Bodies in Close Proximity Using Translucent Fast Pressure- and Temperature-Sensitive Paints,” Experiments in Fluids, Vol. 61, No. 5, 2020, Paper 120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-020-02948-0 Google Scholar[34] Gößling J., Ahlefeldt T. and Hilfer M., “Experimental Validation of Unsteady Pressure-Sensitive Paint for Acoustic Applications,” Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, Vol. 112, April 2019, Paper 109915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2019.109915 Google Scholar[35] Burrows T. J., Vukasinovic B. and Glezer A., “Control of a Transonic Shock in a Serpentine Diffuser Using Surface Fluidic Actuation,” AIAA Aviation 2019 Forum, AIAA Paper 2019-3687, 2019. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2019-3687 LinkGoogle Scholar[36] Burrows T. J., Vukasinovic B. and Glezer A., “Active Control of a 3-D Flow Separation Induced by a Transonic Shock,” Experiments in Fluids, Vol. 62, No. 9, 2021, Paper 187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-021-03280-x Google Scholar[37] Gartner J. and Amitay M., “Flow Control in a Diffuser at Transonic Conditions,” 45th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, AIAA Paper 2015-2484, 2015. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2015-2484 LinkGoogle Scholar[38] Li Z., Liu J., Zhou W., Liu Y. and Wen X., “Experimental Investigation of Flow Dynamics of Sweeping Jets Impinging Upon Confined Concave Surfaces,” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 142, Oct. 2019, Paper 118457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.118457 Google Scholar[39] Koklu M. and Melton L. M., “Sweeping Jet Actuator in a Quiescent Environment,” 43rd AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, AIAA Paper 2013-2477, 2013. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-2477 LinkGoogle Scholar[40] Woszidlo R. and Little J. C., “Recommended Practices for Characterization and Documentation of Active Flow Control Actuators,” AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum, AIAA Paper 2021-2002, 2021. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-2002 LinkGoogle Scholar[41] Peng D., Gu F., Li Y. and Liu Y., “A Novel Sprayable Fast-Responding Pressure-Sensitive Paint Based on Mesoporous Silicone Dioxide Particles,” Sensors and Actuators A Physical, Vol. 279, Aug. 2018, pp. 390–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2018.06.048 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[42] Crafton J. W., Gregory J., Sellers M. and Ruyten W., “Data Processing Tools for Dynamic Pressure-Sensitive Paint,” 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA Paper 2017-0701, 2017. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2017-0701 LinkGoogle Scholar[43] Lee I. and Sung H. J., “Characteristics of Wall Pressure Fluctuations in Separated and Reattaching Flows over a Backward-Facing Step: Part 1,” Time-Mean Statistics and Cross-Spectral Analyses. Experiments in Fluids, Vol. 30, No. 3, 2001, pp. 262–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003480000172 Google Scholar[44] Burrows T. J., Vukasinovic B., Glezer A., Lakebrink M. T. and Mani M., “Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Active Flow Control of a Serpentine Diffuser,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 59, No. 1040, 2020, pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J059533 Google Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails What's Popular Volume 60, Number 12December 2022 CrossmarkInformationCopyright © 2022 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the eISSN 1533-385X to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp. AcknowledgmentsThe authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, China (Grant No. 12072196); the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality, China (Grant No. 19JC1412900); the Advanced Jet Propulsion Innovation Center, China (AEAC HKCX2020-02-028); the Aeronautical Science Foundation of China (2020Z006057001); and the State Key Laboratory of Aerodynamics, China (SKLA-20200303).PDF Received27 March 2022Accepted25 July 2022Published online22 August 2022

Correction: Sequential Data Assimilation of Turbulent Flow and Pressure Fields over Aerofoil

A New Data Assimilation Method of Recovering Turbulent Mean Flow Field at High Reynolds Numbers

Mach Number Effect of Compressible Flow Around A Circular Cylinder

Multi-Objective Optimization of a Transonic Compressor Rotor by Using an Adjoint Method

Performance Impact of Manufacturing Variations for Multistage Steam Turbines

Aerodynamic Design Optimization by Using a Continuous Adjoint Method

Validation and Analyses of QCR Correction Turbulence Model in Sub-/Super-sonic Inner Flows

Improved Prediction of Flow Around Airfoil Accreted with Horn or Ridge Ice

A Data Assimilation Model for Turbulent Flows Using Continuous Adjoint Formulation

Unsteady Transition Studies over a Pitching Airfoil Using a K-Ω-γ Transition Model

Development of Reduced Unsteady Vortex Lattice Method Using Proper Orthogonal Decomposition Technique

Roll Control Using Only Synthetic Jet Actuators at High Angle of Attack

Behavior Sequence(s) of Ramjets and Uncontrollable Problems Due to Undesired Behavior Categories

Comment on “roll Control Using Only Synthetic Jet Actuators at High Angle of Attack”

Investigation of Hysteresis Loop in the Starting Process of Supersonic Cascade

Particle image velocimetry, delayed detached eddy simulation and data assimilation of inclined jet in crossflow

Flow Enhancement from Wall Pressure Observations: A Compressible Continuous Adjoint Data Assimilation Model

Grid-Convergence Study of Two-Dimensional Euler Solutions

Characteristics of Leeward Shear Layer Structure of Hollow-Cone Spray in Gaseous Crossflow

Numerical investigation of an advanced aircraft model during pitching motion at high incidence

Pressure-Sensitive Paint Measurement of a Subsonic Diffuser Controlled by Sweeping Jets