Abstract:Knowledge tracing aims to track students' knowledge status over time to predict students' future performance accurately. In a real environment, teachers expect knowledge tracing models to provide the interpretable result of knowledge status. Markov chain-based knowledge tracing (MCKT) models, such as Bayesian Knowledge Tracing, can track knowledge concept mastery probability over time. However, as the number of tracked knowledge concepts increases, the time complexity of MCKT predicting student performance increases exponentially (also called explaining away problem). When the number of tracked knowledge concepts is large, we cannot utilize MCKT to track knowledge concept mastery probability over time. In addition, the existing MCKT models only consider the relationship between students' knowledge status and problems when modeling students' responses but ignore the relationship between knowledge concepts in the same problem. To address these challenges, we propose an inTerpretable pRobAbilistiC gEnerative moDel (TRACED), which can track students' numerous knowledge concepts mastery probabilities over time. To solve explain away problem, we design long and short-term memory (LSTM)-based networks to approximate the posterior distribution, predict students' future performance, and propose a heuristic algorithm to train LSTMs and probabilistic graphical model jointly. To better model students' exercise responses, we proposed a logarithmic linear model with three interactive strategies, which models students' exercise responses by considering the relationship among students' knowledge status, knowledge concept, and problems. We conduct experiments with four real-world datasets in three knowledge-driven tasks. The experimental results show that TRACED outperforms existing knowledge tracing methods in predicting students' future performance and can learn the relationship among students, knowledge concepts, and problems from students' exercise sequences. We also conduct several case studies. The case studies show that TRACED exhibits excellent interpretability and thus has the potential for personalized automatic feedback in the real-world educational environment.

Automatical Graph-based Knowledge Tracing

DyGKT: Dynamic Graph Learning for Knowledge Tracing

Leveraging Pedagogical Theories to Understand Student Learning Process with Graph-based Reasonable Knowledge Tracing

GIKT: A Graph-Based Interaction Model for Knowledge Tracing

DAGKT: Difficulty and Attempts Boosted Graph-based Knowledge Tracing

Heterogeneous Graph Representation for Knowledge Tracing.

Improving Knowledge Tracing with Collaborative Information

A Survey of Knowledge Tracing: Models, Variants, and Applications

Knowledge Tracing for Complex Problem Solving: Granular Rank-Based Tensor Factorization

Bi-CLKT: Bi-Graph Contrastive Learning based Knowledge Tracing

Quiz-based Knowledge Tracing

APGKT: Exploiting Associative Path on Skills Graph for Knowledge Tracing

HGKT: Introducing Hierarchical Exercise Graph for Knowledge Tracing

Recurrent knowledge tracing machine based on the knowledge state of students

Target Hierarchy-Guided Knowledge Tracing: Fine-Grained Knowledge State Modeling

Automated Knowledge Concept Annotation and Question Representation Learning for Knowledge Tracing

A Deeper Knowledge Tracking Model Integrating Cognitive Theory and Learning Behavior

DGEKT: A Dual Graph Ensemble Learning Method for Knowledge Tracing

A probabilistic generative model for tracking multi-knowledge concept mastery probability

Enhancing Deep Knowledge Tracing with Auxiliary Tasks

Self-supervised Heterogeneous Hypergraph Network for Knowledge Tracing