Associations of Systematic Inflammatory Markers with Diet Quality, Blood Pressure, and Obesity in the AIRWAVE Health Monitoring Study
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/jir.s459238
IF: 4.5
2024-05-19
Journal of Inflammation Research
Abstract:Ghadeer S Aljuraiban, 1 Rachel Gibson, 2 Linda M Oude Griep 3 1 Department of Community Health Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia; 2 Department of Nutritional Sciences, King's College London, London, SE1 9NH, UK; 3 MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK Correspondence: Ghadeer S Aljuraiban, Department of Community Health Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia, Tel +966-118-056-274, Email Introduction: Chronic low-grade inflammation is a characteristic feature of obesity, and elevated levels of inflammation are associated with pathophysiologic consequences and a constellation of metabolic disturbances, such as hypertension. The relationships of inflammation with diet, obesity, and hypertension are complex, hence, this study aimed to assess cross-sectional relationships between inflammatory scores, diet quality, obesity, high blood pressure (BP), and hypertension in the Airwave Health Monitoring Study cohort, a large cohort of police officers and police staff in the United Kingdom. Methods: Data from 5198 men and 3347 women who completed health screening measurements and dietary assessment between 2007 and 2012 were included (n=8545 adults). Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) were calculated. Diet quality was evaluated using the Nutrient-Rich Food 9.3 (NRF9.3) index score. Results: Results show that a 1SD higher diet quality score, waist circumference, and systolic/diastolic BP were significantly associated with SII differences of − 33.3 (95% confidence interval (CI): − 49.0, − 17.6), 8.2 (95% CI: 0.2, 16.6), 17.9 (95% CI: 10.1, 25.8), and 18.3 (95% CI: 10.8, 25.7) (Model 2; P< 0.0001), respectively. A 1SD higher diet quality score, waist circumference, and BMI were also significantly associated with PLR (P< 0.0001). The odds of elevated PLR were higher in those with higher systolic and diastolic BP (P< 0.0001, P=0.0006, respectively). Conclusion: In conclusion, the findings of this analysis add to the existing knowledge indicating a link between inflammation and conditions such as obesity, hypertension, and behavioral factors including diet quality. Of the various inflammatory scores evaluated, SII and PLR were consistently significantly associated with diet quality and these conditions. Keywords: inflammatory markers, diet quality, blood pressure, obesity The impact of diet on obesity and hypertension has been well described, 1–3 and the adverse impact of obesity and hypertension is a global public health priority. 4,5 The relationships between obesity, hypertension, inflammation, and diet are complex. Obesity promotes inflammation, and inflammation perpetuates the metabolic consequences of obesity. 6 Chronic low-grade inflammation is a characteristic feature of obesity, and elevated levels of inflammation are associated with pathophysiologic consequences and a constellation of metabolic disturbances, such as hypertension. 6 Recent studies showed that independent inflammation markers were associated with health outcomes and their risk factors, including cardiovascular disease 7 and hypertension. 8 Systemic inflammation can be evaluated from various biochemical markers widely available from routine blood tests, which provides a low-cost alternative to other measures of inflammation (eg, interleukin-6, TNF-α). 9 Since these markers are influenced by various factors including hydration level and exercise, 10 ratios derived from these markers were created to measure inflammation and immune status with higher stability and predictability including platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), 10 neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), 7 lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), 9 and the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII). 11 Although reference levels of these prognostic inflammation markers in healthy populations are not well established yet, population-specific reference intervals were developed to enhance the prognostic capabilities of these markers 12–17 that can serve as relative indicators of inflammation within a population with higher PLR, NLR, and SII scores and lower LMR scores usually indicative of poorer prognoses of diseases. 7,10,11,18 Although inflammation ratios were found associated with specific health conditions in patient populations, 19–23 there is so far limited research on these ratios in generally healthy populations. Moreover, -Abstract Truncated-
immunology