Who Removed the Stone? Regressed Biventricular Myocardial Calcifications

Zixuan Yang,Ying Xu,Xuan Chen,Qing Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab639
IF: 39.3
2021-01-01
European Heart Journal
Abstract:A 42-year-old male was admitted due to exacerbated heart failure symptoms. One month before, he was diagnosed as severe pneumonia and myocarditis with suspicious cytomegalovirus infection at a local hospital. The 12-lead electrocardiogram displayed sinus tachycardia and low voltage. The echocardiogram revealed enlarged right ventricle (RV), normalsized left ventricle (LV) with reduced ejection fraction (EF). The computed tomography (CT) demonstrated massive myocardial calcifications involving both ventricles (Panel A1). The cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) characterized late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in the LV septum and free wall (Panel B1) and higher Native T1mapping (Panel C1) and T1-mappingderived extracellular volume (ECV) (Panel D1). The myocardial histology confirmed focal calcification and mild lymphocyte infiltration with no pathogen identified. The patient had no readmission on standard medication. He came for reassessment at 8 (Panel A2) and 30 months (Panels A3, B2, C2, and D2). With the removal of myocardial calcifications, the biventricular contractility, T1-mapping, and ECV by CMR were significantly improved except LGE. Myocardial calcifications related to acute myocarditis are an infrequent phenomenon, of which the natural course and mechanisms have not been discovered, while the regression is rarely reported. The CT shows extensive biventricular myocardial calcifications at baseline (Panel A1) and 8 months (Panel A2) but significantly regressed at 30 months (Panel A3); despite persistent LGE in the LV (Panels B1 and B2, black arrows), the CMR shows improved contraction [left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 25.9% vs. 36.2%, right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) 9.5% vs. 32%], normalized T1-mapping (1394 vs. 1103 ms, Panels C1 and C2) and ECV (38.5% vs. 35.4%, Panels D1 and D2) of the LV between baseline and 30 months.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?