Pre-operative Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Subclavian/infraclavicular Axillary Vein

Haiyan Zhou,Bailong Hu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/eja.0000000000001355

2021-01-01

European Journal of Anaesthesiology

Abstract:Editor, We read with great interest the recently published article by Choi et al.,1 which evaluated the effect of pre-operative diameter and collapsibility index of the subclavian vein or the infraclavicular axillary vein for predicting intra-operative hypotension after induction of anaesthesia. The authors stated that the collapsibility index of the infraclavicular axillary vein during deep inspiration was a significant predictor of intra-operative hypotension after induction of anaesthesia. We highly appreciate their efforts and their innovative study. However, there are several issues in this study that were not clearly addressed, which may affect the validity of the conclusions. First, according to the authors, general anaesthesia was induced with midazolam (1 to 3 mg), fentanyl (1 to 2 μg kg−1), propofol (1.5 to 2 μg kg−1), rocuronium (0.6 mg kg−1) and maintained with sevoflurane (1 to 2%). However, whether the depth of anaesthesia was equivalent in all patients and how depth of anaesthesia was monitored was not clearly described in this article. As excessive anaesthetic depth is closely related to intra-operative hypotension,2 we suggest that bispectral index should be used to monitor depth of anaesthesia to avoid excessively deep anaesthetic states and associated hypotension, especially in elderly patients. Second, to our knowledge, different modes of mechanical ventilation may have different haemodynamic effects and haemodynamic compromise may happen more frequently during a period with high positive end-expiratory pressure.3 In other words, a high positive end-expiratory pressure may be more likely to provoke intra-operative hypotension due to a reduction of venous return attributable to an increase in the intrathoracic pressure. However, it was not clearly described whether the mode of mechanical ventilation settings was identical in all patients. Thus, this may bias the interpretation of the findings. Finally, to ensure consistent infraclavicular axillary vein measurements, we suggest that measurements should be carried out three times in each patient, and the average value taken. We believe that addressing the above issues would further help to support the conclusions of this study.