Interaction of Triple Values in Evolution of China's Education
WANG Xiao-hui
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-0209.2012.04.001
2012-01-01
Abstract:The meritocraty, Social Capital and Differential Compensation are important concepts of western sociology. These vital concepts can help analyze the problems faced by our own education systems for development, understand further the law of educational development, and strengthen our ability to make decisions on our national education system. The education policy of giving priority to workers and peasants reflects the concept of differential compensation, but is conducted on the abilitism premise. Therefore, closure of special schools for the children of government officials intends to limit such unfair privileges; key schools are established based on abilitism; and differential compensation and social capital are both involved. The cancellation of the school examination system leads to the removal of abilitism, and the involvement of special privileges will inevitably result in the collapse of the college student recommendation system. Our national college entrance examination system aims at selecting students with highest test scores, and basically eliminates external factors, such as family background, in the decision making process. It maintains basic social justice. The expansion of college student intakes intend to promote education equality, but because of the interference of economic factors and the lack of financial aid, the goal of achieving educational equality still needs a lot of efforts. Certain education policies reflect differential compensation, but the bases for compensation have significant disparity in reality and cannot ensure equality. The underlying factors for school choices are power, personal relationships and money. These factors are the fundamental cause of the prevalence for school choices, and the discontent in our society. The future goal of education development is to establish an education policy system based on abilitism and differential compensation, limiting the growth of social capital. Mass education and elite education are two branches of our higher education development model, which should run parallel without any conflicts. A national college entrance exam based on abilitism and differential compensation should be a more viable approach to achieving education equality. A new system that connects the education with the personnel system, which is based on abilitism, allows government officials or senior managers to be promoted through rigorous exams. We should limit efficiency within the context of economics. When judging equality and fairness, we can use value mechanisms of abilitism and differential compensation: education equality can only be achieved when it is based on abilitism; education fairness can only exist when everyone has same opportunities with the support of differential compensation.