Abstract:OBJECTIVES:: This meta-analysis sought to determine whether video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) improves clinical and resource outcomes compared with thoracotomy (OPEN) in adults undergoing lobectomy for nonsmall cell lung cancer. METHODS:: A comprehensive search was undertaken to identify all randomized (RCT) and nonrandomized (non-RCT) controlled trials comparing VATS with OPEN thoracotomy available up to April 2007. The primary outcome was survival. Secondary outcomes included any other reported clinical outcome and resource utilization. Odds ratios (OR), weighted mean differences (WMD), or standardized mean differences (SMD), and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were analyzed as appropriate. RESULTS:: Baseline prognosis was more favorable for VATS (more females, smaller tumor size, less advanced stage, histology associated with peripheral location and with more indolent disease) than for OPEN in non-RCTs, but not RCT. Postoperative complications were significantly reduced in the VATS group compared with OPEN surgery when both RCT and non-RCT were considered in aggregate (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.32-0.70). Although overall blood loss was significantly reduced with VATS compared with OPEN (-80 mL, 95% CI -110 to -50 mL), the incidence of excessive blood loss (generally defined as >500 mL) and incidence of re-exploration for bleeding was not significantly reduced. Pain measured via visual analog scales (10-point VAS) was significantly reduced by <1 point on day 1, by >2 points at 1 week, and by <1 point at week 2 to 4. Similarly, analgesia requirements were significantly reduced in the VATS group. Postoperative vital capacity was significantly improved (WMD 20, 95% CI 15-25), and at 1 year was significantly greater for VATS versus OPEN surgery (WMD 7, 95% CI 2-12). The incidence of patients reporting limited activity at 3 months was reduced (OR 0.04, 95% CI 0.00-0.82), and time to full activity was significantly reduced in the VATS versus OPEN surgery (WMD -1.5, 95% CI -2.1 to -0.9). Overall patient-reported physical function scores did not differ between groups at 3 years follow-up. Hospital length of stay was significantly reduced by 2.6 days despite increased 16 minutes of operating time for VATS versus OPEN. The incidence of cancer recurrence (local or distal) was not significantly different, but chemotherapy delays were significantly reduced for VATS versus OPEN (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.06-0.38). The need for chemotherapy reduction was also decreased (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.16-0.87), and the number of patients who did not receive at least 75% of their planned chemotherapy without delays were reduced (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.18-0.93). The risk of death was not significantly reduced when RCTs were considered alone; however, when non-RCTs (n = 18) were included, the risk of death at 1 to 5 years was significantly reduced (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.55-0.94; P = 0.02) for VATS versus OPEN. Stage-specific survival to 5 years was not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS:: This meta-analysis suggests that there may be some short term, and possibly even long-term, advantages to performing lung resections with VATS techniques rather than through conventional thoracotomy. Overall, VATS for lobectomy may reduce acute and chronic pain, perioperative morbidity, and improve delivery of adjuvant therapies, without a decrease in stage specific long-term survival. However, the results are largely dependent on non-RCTs, and future adequately powered randomized trials with long-term follow-up are encouraged.

Does a Thoracoscopic Approach Provide Better Outcomes for Pulmonary Metastases?

Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Versus Open Thoracotomy In Pulmonary Metastasectomy: A Meta-Analysis Of Observational Studies

Video‐assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus open thoracotomy for resection of lung metastasis—A meta‐analysis of reconstructed time‐to‐event data

Treatment of Pulmonary Metastases by Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery:a Report of 38 Cases

Surgical Approach and Outcomes for Treatment of Pulmonary Metastases

Comparing the Efficacy of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Open Thoracotomy in Sleeve Lobectomy for the Treatment of Central-Type Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Video-assisted thoracic surgery in lung cancer resection: a meta-analysis and systematic review of controlled trials.

Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Versus Muscle-Sparing Thoracotomy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Is video-assisted thoracoscopy a sufficient approach for mediastinal lymph node dissection to treat lung cancer after neoadjuvant therapy?

The Long-Survival of Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery in the Treatment of Pulmonary Metastases

Trans-sternotomy Versus Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Early-Stage Thymoma Patients: a Meta-Analysis.

Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery Vs. Thoracotomy for Locally Advanced Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Perioperative Comparison of Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery and Open Lobectomy for Pt1-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients in China: a Multi-Center Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Thoracoscopic Surgery Versus Thoracotomy for Lung Cancer: Short-Term Outcomes of a Randomized Trial.

Evaluating VATS versus Open Surgery for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A 5-year Retrospective Study

Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery vs. Thoracotomy for the Treatment in Patients With Esophageal Leiomyoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Comparison of Outcomes Between Muscle-Sparing Thoracotomy and Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery in Patients with Ct1 N0 M0 Lung Cancer

Video-assisted versus conventional thoracotomy pneumonectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes and short-term measures of convalescence.

OA13.02 Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Vs. Thoracotomy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Survival Outcome of a Randomized Trial

Surgical Outcomes of Video-Assisted Versus Open Pneumonectomy for Lung Cancer: A Real-World Study

Lobectomy with Pulmonary Artery Angioplasty for Lung Cancer Using Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Versus Open Thoracotomy: a Retrospective Propensity Matched Analysis.