Commentary: on the Efficiency of Covariance Localisation of the Ensemble Kalman Filter Using Augmented Ensembles

Craig H. Bishop,Jeffrey S. Whitaker,Lili Lei
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fams.2020.00002
2020-01-01
Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics
Abstract:(i)The predecessor of the GETKF eigenvalue form of the modified gain matrix equation appeared in Bishop (2012, 2014)The spectral shift theorem reduces the differences in the numerical cancellation errors referred to by Farchi and Bouquet. (iii) The eigenvalue form enables Wang et al's (2004) corrections for ensemble rank deficiency. (iv) A proof of the equivalence of the eigenvalue form and Bouquet's form.To be specific about the forms of the modified gain matrix, let (  − − −   = −  − − −   = − x x x x x x Z R x x x x x x Z (1)where K is the total number of ensemble members in the ensemble forecast and where the nvector f ix is the i th member of the prior ensemble forecast and where the p-vector( ) f iH x is the i th member of the prior ensemble forecast of the p-vector y of p observations. When pp. Eq (9) is just an eigenvalue form of the modified gain matrix of Whitaker and Hamill's (2002) Ensemble Square Root Filter.3) Equivalence of (9) and (8) Bouquet's (2016) equation (25) can be derived from (9) with the following steps:(i)Drop the dimension subscripts and manipulate ( ) 1/2 1 − −  −  +   II as follows () ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 1(ii) Use (10) in (9)(iv) Using (12) and (3) in (11) gives ( )( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )Equation (13) is equivalent to (8) and Bouquet's (2016) equation (25).Numerical cancellation errors increase when the condition number of the matrix increases. Let
What problem does this paper attempt to address?