Superconductivity-induced Transverse Plasma Mode and Phonon Anomaly in the C -Axis Response of the Bilayer Compound RbCa2Fe4As4F

Bîng Xu,D. Munzar,A. Dubroka,E. Sheveleva,Fryderyk Lyzwa,P. Maršík,Chennan Wang,Z. C. Wang,Guang‐Han Cao,C. Bernhard
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.101.214512
2020-01-01
Abstract:We studied the infrared response of polycrystalline samples of the iron arsenide superconductor $(\mathrm{Rb},\mathrm{Cs}){\mathrm{Ca}}_{2}{\mathrm{Fe}}_{4}{\mathrm{As}}_{4}{\mathrm{F}}_{2}$ (Rb,Cs-12442), which has a bilayer structure similar to the high-${T}_{c}$ cuprates ${\mathrm{YBa}}_{2}{\mathrm{Cu}}_{3}{\mathrm{O}}_{7}$ (YBCO) and ${\mathrm{Bi}}_{2}{\mathrm{Sr}}_{2}{\mathrm{CaCu}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{8}$. The $c$-axis reflectivity spectra ${R}_{c}$ have been derived from the reflectivity spectra of the polycrystalline samples ${R}_{\mathrm{poly}}$ and the in-plane spectrum of a corresponding Cs-12442 crystal ${R}_{ab}$ using a geometrical averaging approach with ${R}_{c}=3{R}_{\mathrm{poly}}\ensuremath{-}2{R}_{ab}$. In analogy to the $c$-axis response of the cuprates, we observe a superconductivity-induced transverse plasma mode and a phonon anomaly that are both signatures of local electric field effects that arise from a large difference between the local conductivities in the intra- and interbilayer regions. Using a multilayer model developed for the cuprates, we obtain a good description of the $c$-axis response and derive the local conductivities at $T\ensuremath{\simeq}{T}_{c}$ of ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{1}^{\mathrm{bl}}(\ensuremath{\omega}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0)\ensuremath{\simeq}1000{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Omega}}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}{\mathrm{cm}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ and ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{1}^{\mathrm{int}}(\ensuremath{\omega}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0)\ensuremath{\simeq}15{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Omega}}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}{\mathrm{cm}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$, respectively, that are similar to the ones previously found in underdoped YBCO. Different from the cuprates, we find no evidence of a normal-state pseudogap in terms of a partial suppression of the low-energy electronic states that sets in already well above ${T}_{c}$. There is also no clear sign of an onset of precursor superconducting pairing correlations well above ${T}_{c}\ensuremath{\simeq}$ 30 K. This highlights that the pseudogap and the precursor superconducting pairing well above ${T}_{c}$ are unique features of the cuprates with their strong electronic correlations and, for example, not just the result of a strongly anisotropic electronic response due to the layered crystal structure.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?