Efficacy and Safety of Long-Term Antithrombotic Strategies in Patients With Chronic Coronary Syndrome: A Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Houyong Zhu,Xiaoqun Xu,Xiaojiang Fang,Fei Ying,Liuguang Song,Beibei Gao,Guoxin Tong,Liang Zhou,Tielong Chen,Jinyu Huang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.019184
IF: 6.106
2021-03-09
Journal of the American Heart Association
Abstract:Background Long‐term antithrombotic strategies for patients with chronic coronary syndrome with high‐risk factors represent an important treatment dilemma in clinical practice. Our aim was to conduct a network meta‐analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of long‐term antithrombotic strategies in patients with chronic coronary syndrome. Methods and Results Four randomized studies were included (n=75167; THEMIS [Ticagrelor on Health Outcomes in Diabetes Mellitus Patients Intervention Study], COMPASS [Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies], PEGASUS‐TIMI 54 [Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Prior Heart Attack Using Ticagrelor Compared to Placebo on a Background of Aspirin–Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 54], and DAPT [Dual Anti‐platelet Therapy]). The odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs) were calculated as the measure of effect size. The results of the network meta‐analysis showed that, compared with aspirin monotherapy, the ORs for trial‐defined major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events were 0.86; (95% CI, 0.80–0.93) for ticagrelor plus aspirin, 0.89 (95% CI, 0.78–1.02) for rivaroxaban monotherapy, 0.74 (95% CI, 0.64–0.85) for rivaroxaban plus aspirin, and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.60,–0.86) for thienopyridine plus aspirin. Compared with aspirin monotherapy, the ORs for trial‐defined major bleeding were 2.15 (95% CI, 1.78–2.59]) for ticagrelor plus aspirin, 1.51 (95% CI, 1.23–1.85) for rivaroxaban monotherapy, and 1.68 (95% CI, 1.37–2.05) for rivaroxaban plus aspirin. For death from any cause, the improvement effect of rivaroxaban plus aspirin was detected versus aspirin monotherapy (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.65–0.90), ticagrelor plus aspirin (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66–0.95), rivaroxaban monotherapy (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69–0.97), and thienopyridine plus aspirin (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.41–0.82) regimens. Conclusions All antithrombotic strategies combined with aspirin significantly reduced the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events and increased the risk of major bleeding compared with aspirin monotherapy. Considering the outcomes of all ischemic and bleeding events and all‐cause mortality, rivaroxaban plus aspirin appears to be the preferred long‐term antithrombotic regimen for patients with chronic coronary syndrome and high‐risk factors. Nonstandard Abbreviations and Acronyms CAPRIE Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischaemic Events CCS chronic coronary syndrome COMPASS Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies trial DAPT Dual Anti‐platelet Therapy study GUSTO Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Arteries criteria MACEs major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events PEGASUS‐TIMI 54 Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Prior Heart Attack Using Ticagrelor Compared to Placebo on a Background of Aspirin–Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 54 trial PLATO Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes trial POPular AGE Clopidogrel Versus Ticagrelor or Prasugrel in Patients Aged 70 Years or Older With Non–ST‐Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: The Randomised, Open‐Label, Non‐Inferiority Trial SUCRA surface under the cumulative ranking THEMIS Ticagrelor on Health Outcomes in Diabetes Mellitus Patients Intervention Study Clinical Perspective What Is New? For all‐cause mortality, the improvement effect of rivaroxaban plus aspirin was detected versus aspirin monotherapy, ticagrelor plus aspirin, rivaroxaban monotherapy, and thienopyridine plus aspirin regimens in patients with chronic coronary syndrome. What Are the Clinical Implications? Rivaroxaban plus aspirin appears to be the preferred long‐term antithrombotic regimen -Abstract Truncated-
cardiac & cardiovascular systems