MP62-06 COMBINED CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI PARAMETERS FOR PREDICTION OF CRIBRIFORM MORPHOLOGY IN INTERMEDIATE-RISK PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS

Jie Gao,Qing Zhang,Hongqian Guo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000000937.06
IF: 7.6
2020-01-01
The Journal of Urology
Abstract:You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Staging I (MP62)1 Apr 2020MP62-06 COMBINED CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI PARAMETERS FOR PREDICTION OF CRIBRIFORM MORPHOLOGY IN INTERMEDIATE-RISK PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS Jie Gao*, Qing Zhang, and Hongqian Guo Jie Gao*Jie Gao* More articles by this author , Qing ZhangQing Zhang More articles by this author , and Hongqian GuoHongqian Guo More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000937.06AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: To develop a risk model with combined clinical characteristics and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) parameters for prediction of cribriform morphology in intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients. METHODS: We retrospectively included 215 PCa patients received mpMRI examination, targeted biopsy (TB) combined with systematic biopsy (SB), radical prostatectomy and final Gleason group 2 or 3. Cribriform status was confirmed on both biopsy slices and whole-mount sections. Characteristics were stratified by cribriform status. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed for significant predictors, followed by cribriform-risk nomogram construction. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used for internal discrimination validation with corresponding area under the curve (AUC). Calibration curves were plotted and decision curve analysis were performed for clinical benefit exploration. RESULTS: Cribriform morphology was identified in 51.2% (110/215) patients. Sensitivities of TB, SB, TB+SB for detecting cribriform morphology were 28.2% (31/110), 22.7% (25/110) and 36.4% (40/110), respectively (Figure 1). Further, PSAD (P=0.003), PI-RADS score (P<0.001) and maximal biopsy Gleason score (P=0.004) were independent predictors for positive cribriform morphology. As shown in Figure 2, cribriform-risk nomogram was constructed with the three parameters and demonstrated considerable discrimination (AUC=0.887, sensitivity 79.2%, specificity 84.0%) and calibration (mean absolute error 0.021), harboring net benefits with threshold probabilities range from 0 to 0.88 (data not shown). CONCLUSIONS: A cribriform-risk nomogram was developed and well predicted aggressive cribriform morphology in intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients. Source of Funding: None © 2020 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 203Issue Supplement 4April 2020Page: e947-e948 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2020 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Jie Gao* More articles by this author Qing Zhang More articles by this author Hongqian Guo More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
What problem does this paper attempt to address?