PD28-08 NUMBER OF INTRAVAGINAL THRUSTS BEFORE EJACULATION (NITBE): A CONVENIENT AND RELIABLE TOOL FOR PREMATURE EJACULATION ASSESSMENT

Dong Fang,Yiming Yuan,Jing Peng,Zhichao Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000000892.08
IF: 7.6
2020-01-01
The Journal of Urology
Abstract:You have accessJournal of UrologySexual Function/Dysfunction: Evaluation I (PD28)1 Apr 2020PD28-08 NUMBER OF INTRAVAGINAL THRUSTS BEFORE EJACULATION (NITBE): A CONVENIENT AND RELIABLE TOOL FOR PREMATURE EJACULATION ASSESSMENT Dong Fang*, Yiming Yuan, Jing Peng, and Zhichao Zhang Dong Fang*Dong Fang* More articles by this author , Yiming YuanYiming Yuan More articles by this author , Jing PengJing Peng More articles by this author , and Zhichao ZhangZhichao Zhang More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000892.08AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) is important in the evaluation of premature ejaculation (PE). However, the stopwatch-measured IELT (SW-IELT) is inconvenient in clinics while the self-estimate IELT (E-IELT) is inaccurate. This study is to evaluate the number of intravaginal thrusts before ejaculation (NITBE) in the assessment of PE. METHODS: A prospective study which included PE patients (204 couples) and comparatives (106 couples) was performed from Sep 2015 to Mar 2016. SW-IELT, E-IELT and NITBE were collected and evaluated. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between two groups. The median SW-IELT was 47.6s vs 187.2s between PE patients and comparatives (p<0.001), and the median NITBE was 41.8 vs 152.4 (p<0.001). It’s interesting that the average time of one thrust was similar (1.1±0.2 s/time vs 1.2±0.2 s/time, p>0.05) between the two groups. As for E-IELT, although patients with PE also exhibited much worse results (94.4s vs 447.5s, p<0.001), there’s significant difference between E-IELT and SW-IELT (p<0.001) and NITBE was more correlated with SW-IELT with a person correlation of 0.989. By ROC curve, 75 times would be the best cut-off value with sensitivity of 81.1% and specificity of 88.2%. CONCLUSIONS: NITBE could be used as a convenient and reliable tool for PE assessment. Source of Funding: None © 2020 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 203Issue Supplement 4April 2020Page: e615-e615 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2020 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Dong Fang* More articles by this author Yiming Yuan More articles by this author Jing Peng More articles by this author Zhichao Zhang More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
What problem does this paper attempt to address?