Antitrust Law Remedies for Startup Acquisitions in the Digital Economy

Jiao Haitao
2023-01-01
Abstract:Startup acquisitions are common in the digital economy, and they are different from killer acquisitions in the pharmaceutical industry. Startup acquisitions may be horizontal, but more are vertical or conglomerate. after the Acquisition is completed, the acquired product or service is generally integrated into the platform’s ecosystem, so it may bring economic efficiency. The anti-trust law remedies should be set according to the types and damages of the start-up acquisitions. When the acquisition parties are competitors, the antitrust authority may require the acquirer to make commitments of prohibition of “killing” and independent operation, so as to ensure that the acquired products or services remain in the market after the acquisition and weaken the acquirer’s market power brought by the acquisition. When the object of the acquisition includes some important resources, the acquisition may cause anticompetitive foreclosure. In such cases, the authority may require the acquirer to commit to keep the market open. When acquisitions lead to expansion of business lines of the platform and may lead to conflicts of interest, the authority many impose some “functional separations” requirements on the acquirer to isolate the business lines that may cause conflicts of interest from other business lines of the platform. In startup acquisitions involving a large amount of user data, the establishment of an independent “data silo” is an important measure to prevent excessive commercial use of user data. At the same time, users’ freedom of choice must be fully guaranteed. Compared with the above behavioral remedies, the application of structural remedies in startup acquisitions should follow the principle of proportionality. Generally, they are only considered in very specific market structures.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?