In Reply to 'serum Cystatin C May Diagnose Rather Than Predict Acute Kidney Injury'

Zhongheng Zhang,Baolong Lu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.12.013
IF: 11.072
2012-01-01
American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Abstract:We thank Haase et al1Haase M. Bellomo R. Haase-Fielitz A. Serum cystatin C may diagnose rather than predict acute kidney injury.Am J Kidney Dis. 2012; 59: 582Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar for their comments regarding our meta-analysis2Zhang Z. Lu B. Sheng X. Jin N. Cystatin C in prediction of acute kidney injury: a systemic review and meta-analysis.Am J Kidney Dis. 2011; 58: 356-365Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (195) Google Scholar of the use of cystatin C in predicting acute kidney injury. An area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.8 might be calculated using the sample size as the weight. However, in our study we used the standard error as the weight, which is an approach recommended and validated by McClish.3McClish D.K. Combining and comparing area estimates across studies or strata.Med Decis Making. 1992; 12: 274-279Crossref PubMed Scopus (57) Google Scholar However, we concede that because the test for heterogeneity was highly significant, a random effects model would be more appropriate. Recalculating accordingly gives an estimate of 0.87 for the AUROC, instead of 0.96 as published in our study. An Erratum notifying readers of this recalculated value is also published in this issue.4Erratum regarding “Cystatin C in prediction of acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis”.Am J Kidney Dis. 2012; 59 (No authors listed) (Am J Kidney Dis 2011; 58:356-365): 590-592Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (1) Google Scholar With respect to the comment regarding the diagnostic odds ratio, we acknowledge that the pooled diagnostic odds ratio is not directly related to a pooled AUROC. As to the identity of circles shown in our article's data figures, we extracted more than one set of data from a study if multiple measurements of cystatin C were provided for different time points. Since this issue was raised, we have learned that this methodology would only be appropriate in the case of independent subgroups; revised versions of the affected figures have been included in the Erratum. With respect to the inclusion of the study by Haase et al,5Haase M. Bellomo R. Devarajan P. et al.Novel biomarkers early predict the severity of acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery in adults.Ann Thorac Surg. 2009; 88: 124-130Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (164) Google Scholar we concur that presurgical kidney function is another determinant of acute kidney injury in patients who are undergoing cardiac bypass surgery. Financial Disclosure: The authors declare that they have no relevant financial interests. Serum Cystatin C May Diagnose Rather Than Predict Acute Kidney InjuryAmerican Journal of Kidney DiseasesVol. 59Issue 4PreviewWe read the recent meta-analysis by Zhang et al1 with concern. Recalculation of the main result (an area under the curve [AUC] of 0.96 with a narrow confidence interval [0.95-0.97]) using the data provided shows an (un)weighted AUC of 0.8 regardless of whether the Liang et al study2 is included or not. The diagnostic odds ratio of 23.5 cannot be related to the reported AUC of 0.96.3 Full-Text PDF
What problem does this paper attempt to address?