A Family with Partial Duplication/deletion 4p Due to a Balanced T (4; 15) (p16.2; P11.2) Translocation
Lingqian Wu,Dahua Meng,Zhongmin Zhou,Juan Du,Zhigao Long,Desheng Liang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.33867
2011-01-01
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
Abstract:Wolf–Hirschhorn syndrome (WHS) is caused by a deletion involving the 4p16.3 region.Most of the deletions are de novo but at least 15% derive from parental balanced rearrangements [Lurie et al., 1980; South et al., 2008]. Most of the partial trisomy 4p cases originating from parental balanced translocation involve an acrocentric chromosome, especially the chromosome 22 [Crane et al., 1979]. Families with both partial monosomy and trisomy 4p have been less reported although five such families have been suspected. Of the latter, only two were documented by conventional cytogenetics [Schwanitz and Grosse, 1973; Andrle et al., 1976; Mortimer et al., 1978; Crane et al., 1979; Takeno et al., 2004]. Here we describe a family with t (4; 15) translocation presenting in three generations, resulting in two patients with 4p duplication and one with 4p deletion. Copy number analysis with SNP arrays detected a 5,047,291 bp terminal 4p deletion in the propositus and the same size of duplication in her younger brother, this being the smallest confirmed duplication of terminal 4p reported to date. This family comes fromGuangxi province of China (Fig. 1). The propositus (III:6), a 9-year-old girl, is the third child of healthy nonconsanguineous parents. Her two elder sibs died of unknown causes within two months of birth, and no chromosome analysis was carried out. The propositus was born at full term with birth weight 1,750 g (< 3rd centile). The development milestones were delayed. At age two years she was evaluated by the Gesell developmental schedules, showing gross andfinemotor abilityDQ to be 27, languageDQ10, adaptive abilityDQ20, andpersonal-socialDQ14. When we saw her at age nine years because of poor language and calculating capacity, her height was 124 cm (between 3rd and 25th centile), weight 23.5 kg (between 25th and 50th centile) and OFC 45 cm (< 3rd centile). She had a typical ‘‘Greek warrior helmet’’ facial appearance, showing the broad bridge of the nose continuing to the forehead. Other facial features included a high forehead with prominent glabella, highly arched eyebrows, ocular hypertelorism, short philtrum, dental dysplasia and a tag before the right ear (Fig. 1A). Hypotonia was noticed, but no major malformations were observed. She had developed seizures, but an electroencephalogram (EEG) had not been performed. The brain CT was normal. The propositus’ younger brother (III:7), a 2-month-old boy, was born at full term via cesarean with birth weight 5.1 kg (>97th centile). His development milestones were within normal limits. Examination at two months revealed a height of 63 cm (between 75th and 97th centile), weight 7 kg (between 75th and 97th centile) and OFC 39.5 cm (50th centile). The facial appearance was not distinctive, except for prominent forehead and broad nasal bridge (Fig. 1B). Other clinical findings included high arched palate, short neck, low hairline, wide spaced nipples and small penis. The propositus’ uncle (II:7), a 34-year-old man, was mildly mentally retarded with poor language and calculating ability, while he could communicate with us and take care of himself. Physical examination revealed a height of 177 cm, weight 80 kg and OFC 58.5 cm, all within normal limits. Other findings included prominent supraorbital fusion across the glabella, low hairline (Fig. 1C), wide spaced nipples and small penis. G-banded chromosome analysis of the propositus (III:6) revealed a satellite appearing on the short arm of the derived chromosome 4 with no other obvious rearrangement observable in the metaphase spreads. High resolution G banding, Ag-NOR