Comparison of a Soluble Co-Formulation of Insulin Degludec/insulin Aspart Vs Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 in Type 2 Diabetes: a Randomised Trial

Leo Niskanen,Lawrence A. Leiter,Edward Franek,Jianping Weng,Taner Damcı,Manuel Muñoz‐Torres,J.-P. Donnet,Lars Endahl,Trine Vang Skjøth,Allan Vaag
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/eje-12-0293e
2012-01-01
European Journal of Endocrinology
Abstract:The journal and the authors apologise for errors in Table 2 of this article that was published in the August issue (vol 167 , pp 287–294 ). The n values were incorrectly published. The correct values are presented below and the table is published in full below. Table 2 Observed mean changes from baseline HbA1c, FPG and body weight. Data are observed as mean ( s.d .) for all randomised subjects (full analysis set). n Baselinea Week 16b Change from baseline HbA1c (%) IDegAsp 61 8.5 (1.2) 6.7 (1.0) −1.8 (1.1)c AF 59 8.5 (0.9) 6.6 (0.6) −1.9 (1.1)c BIAsp 30 62 8.6 (1.0) 6.7 (0.7) −1.8 (0.9)c FPG (mmol/l) IDegAsp 61 11.5 (2.6) 6.4 (2.2) −5.1 (2.9) AF 59 11.8 (2.9) 6.5 (1.9) −5.3 (3.0) BIAsp 30 62 11.7 (3.1) 7.5 (2.1) −4.3 (3.0) Body Weight (kg) IDegAsp 61 87.5 (16.3) 88.6 (16.9) 1.1 (2.8) AF 59 84.9 (14.3) 85.6 (14.9) 0.7 (2.5) BIAsp 30 62 91.8 (13.5) 93.2 (13.1) 1.4 (3.2) a Values at randomisation. b Last observation carried forward. c % points.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?