Abstract:Peripheral nerve ultrasound is a well-established imaging technique to evaluate certain peripheral nerve pathologies. However, there is a poor correlation between ultrasound abnormalities of peripheral nerves and electrodiagnostic or clinical evidence of axonal loss. This is a significant limitation of peripheral nerve ultrasound, as many peripheral nerve diseases encountered in clinical settings are related to axonal loss. Furthermore, clinical and electrodiagnostic evidence of axonal loss directly correlates with disability in all peripheral nerve diseases. However, due to the floor effects often encountered in electrodiagnostic studies, these correlations, as well as definitive diagnoses, are often challenging. Thus, imaging techniques that correlate with axonal loss are essential for expanding the utility of peripheral nerve ultrasound as a potential biomarker for peripheral nerve diseases. With new technological advancements and the ever-increasing imaging capabilities of high-frequency ultrasound, the palmar and digital nerve branches of the hand can be imaged with exceptionally high resolution even using point-of-care ultrasound devices. Their superficial and distal-most anatomic locations are ideal for evaluating polyneuropathies, as these branches degenerate earliest during axonal loss. However, no studies have systematically evaluated these nerve branches to determine if they can be reproducibly measured with ultrasound. The current protocol was adapted for the systematic assessment of cross-sectional areas of the median and ulnar nerves in the palmar surface and digits of the hand. This protocol provides reference data for a subset of nerves that demonstrate high intraclass correlation coefficients between three separate ultrasonographers. Finally, as a proof of concept and to demonstrate the clinical applications of this protocol, representative data from individuals with genetically confirmed inherited polyneuropathies are compared with established normative data to examine cross-sectional area differences.

Less Common Mononeuropathies

Updates on Common Mononeuropathies

A Practical Approach to Diagnosing Peripheral Neuropathies

The Role of Neuromuscular Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Peripheral Neuropathy

Neuromuscular Ultrasound in Polyneuropathies

Rare entrapment neuropathies of the lower extremity: A narrative review

[Peripheral neuropathies, from diagnosis to treatment, review of the literature and lessons from the local experience]

Immune-Mediated Neuropathies: Top 10 Clinical Pearls

Nerve Biopsy Findings Contribute to Diagnosis of Multiple Mononeuropathy： 78% of Findings Support Clinical Diagnosis

Unusual Motor Hand Neuropathies: Causes, Diagnosis, and Evaluation of Motor Impairments

Nerve ultrasound in polyneuropathies

Molecular, Electrophysiological, and Ultrasonographic Differences in Selected Immune-Mediated Neuropathies with Therapeutic Implications

Clinical Reasoning: A 60-Year-Old Man With Asymmetric Weakness and Persistent Fever

Monoclonal gammopathy‐associated peripheral neuropathies: Uncovering pearls and challenges

Peripheral Nerve Imaging Aids in the Diagnosis of Immune-Mediated Neuropathies—A Case Series

Nerve Ultrasound Protocol to Detect Dysimmune Neuropathies

High-frequency Ultrasonography of the Digital and Palmar Nerve Branches of the Hand in Peripheral Nerve Diseases

Electrodiagnostic studies and new diagnostic modalities for evaluation of peripheral nerve disorders

Clinical Reasoning: A 61-Year-Old Man With Progressive Right Leg Numbness and Weakness

Infectious Neuropathies

Collection of Rare Peripheral Nerve Tumors-Insights from the German Registry