Measurement of Higher-Order Multipole Amplitudes in Ψ(3686)→γχc1,2 With

M. Ablikim,M. N. Achasov,X. C. Ai,O. Albayrak,M. Albrecht,D. J. Ambrose,A. Amoroso,F. F. An,Q. An,J. Z. Bai,R. Baldini Ferroli,Y. Ban,D. W. Bennett,J. V. Bennett,M. Bertani,D. Bettoni,J. M. Bian,F. Bianchi,E. Boger,I. Boyko,R. A. Briere,H. Cai,X. Cai,O. Çakır,A. Calcaterra,G. F. Cao,S. A. Cetin,J. F. Chang,Gueorgui Chelkov,G. Chen,H. S. Chen,H. Y. Chen,J. C. Chen,M. L. Chen,S. Chen,S. J. Chen,X. Chen,X. R. Chen,Y. B. Chen,H. P. Cheng,X. Chu,G. Cibinetto,H. L. Dai,J. P. Dai,A. Dbeyssi,Dmitri Dedovich,Z. Y. Deng,A. Denig,I. Denysenko,M. Destefanis,F. De Mori,Y. Ding,C. Dong,J. Dong,L. Y. Dong,M. Y. Dong,Z. L. Dou,S. X. Du,Pengfei Duan,Jingzhou Fan,J. Fang,Fang Su,Xin Fang,Y. Fang,R. Farinelli,L. Fava,Oleg Fedorov,F. Feldbauer,G. Felici,C. Q. Feng,E. Fioravanti,M. Fritsch,C. D. Fu,Q. Gao,X. L. Gao,X. Y. Gao,Y. Gao,Z. Gao,I. Garzia,K. Goetzen,L. Gong,W. X. Gong,W. Gradl,M. Greco,M. H. Gu,Y. T. Gu,Y. H. Guan,A. Q. Guo,L. B. Guo,R. P. Guo,Y. P. Guo,Z. Haddadi,A. Hafner,S. Han,X. Q. Hao,F. A. Harris,K. L. He,T. Held,Heng Yang,Z. L. Hou,Hu Chen,H. M. Hu,Jifeng Hu,T. Hu,Y. Hu,G. S. Huang,J. Huang,X. T. Huang,X. Z. Huang,Y. Huang,Z. Huang,T. Hussain,Q. P. Ji,X. B. Ji,X. L. Ji,L. W. Jiang,X. S. Jiang,X. Y. Jiang,J. B. Jiao,Z. Jiao,D. P. Jin,S. Jin,T. Johansson,A. Julin,N. Kalantar–Nayestanaki,X. L. Kang,X. S. Kang,M. Kavatsyuk,B. C. Ke,P. Kiese,R. Kliemt,B. Kloss,O. B. Kolcu,B. Kopf,M. Kornicer,A. Kupść,W. Kühn,J. S. Lange,M. Lara,P. Larin,H. Leithoff,C. Leng,C. Li,Cheng Li,D. M. Li,F. Li,F. Y. Li,G. Li,H. B. Li,H. J. Li,J. C. Li,Jin Li,K. Li,Lei Li,P. R. Li,Q. Y. Li,Tong Li,W. D. Li,W. G. Li,X. L. Li,X. M. Li,X. N. Li,X. Q. Li,Y. B. Li,Z. B. Li,H. Liang,Jingjing Liang,Y. F. Liang,Y. T. Liang,G. R. Liao,D. X. Lin,B. Liu,B. J. Liu,C. X. Liu,D. Liu,F. H. Liu,Fang Liu,Feng Liu,H. B. Liu,H. H. Liu,H. M. Liu,J. Liu,J. B. Liu,J. P. Liu,J. Y. Liu,K. Liu,K. Y. Liu,L. D. Liu,P. L. Liu,Qian Liu,S. B. Liu,X. Liu,Y. B. Liu,Z. A. Liu,Z. Q. Liu,H. Loehner,X. C. Lou,H. J. Lu,J. G. Lü,Y. Lu,Y. P. Lu,C. L. Luo,M. X. Luo,T. Luo,X. L. Luo,X. R. Lyu,F. C.,H. L.,L. L.,M. M.,Q. M.,Tengfei Ma,X. N.,X. Y.,Y. M.,F. E. Maas,M. Maggiora,Y. J. Mao,Z. P. Mao,S. Marcello,J. G. Messchendorp,G. Mezzadri,J. Min,R. E. Mitchell,X. H. Mo,Y. J. Mo,Morales,N. Yu. Muchnoi,H. Muramatsu,Y. Nefedov,F. Nerling,I. B. Nikolaev,Z. Ning,S. Nisar,S. L. Niu,X. Y. Niu,S. L. Olsen,Q. Ouyang,S. Pacetti,Yue Pan,P. Patteri,M. Pelizaeus,H. P. Peng,K. Peters,J. Pettersson,J. L. Ping,R. G. Ping,R. Poling,V. Prasad,H. R. Qi,Mingyao Qi,S. Qian,C. F. Qiao,L. Q. Qin,Ning Qin,X. S. Qin,Z. H. Qin,J. F. Qiu,K. H. Rashid,C. F. Redmer,M. Ripka,G. Rong,Ch. Rosner,Xifeng Ruan,A. Sarantsev,M. Savrié,K. Schoenning,S. Schumann,W. Shan,M. Shao,C. P. Shen,P. X. Shen,X. Y. Shen,H. Y. Sheng,Meng Shi,W. M. Song,X. Y. Song,S. Sosio,S. Spataro,G. X. Sun,J. F. Sun,S. S. Sun,X. H. Sun,Y. J. Sun,Y. Z. Sun,Z. J. Sun,Z. T. Sun,C. J. Tang,Xiaoping Tang,İ. Tapan,E. H. Thorndike,M. Tiemens,M. Ullrich,I. Uman,G. S. Varner,B. Wang,B. L. Wang,Dongdong Wang,D. Y. Wang,K. Wang,L. L. Wang,L. S. Wang,M. Wang,P. Wang,P. L. Wang,S. G. Wang,W. Wang,W. P. Wang,X. F. Wang,Y. Wang,Y. D. Wang,Y. F. Wang,Y. Q. Wang,Z. Wang,Z. G. Wang,Z. H. Wang,Z. Y. Wang,T. Weber,D. H. Wei,J. B. Wei,P. Weidenkaff,S. P. Wen,U. Wiedner,M. Wolke,L. H. Wu,L. J. Wu,Z. Wu,L. Xia,Yuxing Xia,D. Xiao,H. Xiao,Z. J. Xiao,Y. Xie,Q. L. Xiu,G. F. Xu,Jingjing Xu,D. Xu,Qiao Xu,Qing Xu,X. P. Xu,Yan Liang,W. B. Yan,W. C. Yan,Y. H. Yan,H. J. Yang,H. X. Yang,L. Yang,Y. X. Yang,M. Ye,M. H. Ye,J. H. Yin,B. X. Yu,C. X. Yu,J. S. Yu,C. Z. Yuan,Wen Lun Yuan,Yixuan Yuan,A. Yuncu,A. A. Zafar,A. Zallo,Y. Zeng,Z. Zeng,B. X. Zhang,B. Y. Zhang,C. Zhang,C. C. Zhang,D. H. Zhang,H. H. Zhang,H. Y. Zhang,J. Zhang,J. J. Zhang,J. L. Zhang,J. Q. Zhang,J. W. Zhang,J. Y. Zhang,J. Z. Zhang,K. Zhang,L. Zhang,S. Q. Zhang,X. Y. Zhang,Y. Zhang,Y. H. Zhang,Y. N. Zhang,Y. T. Zhang,Yu Zhang,Z. H. Zhang,Z. P. Zhang,Z. Y. Zhang,Gang Zhao,J. Zhao,J. Y. Zhao,J. Z. Zhao,Zhao Liu,Ling Zhao,M. G. Zhao,Q. Zhao,S. J. Zhao,T. C. Zhao,Y. Zhao,Z. G. Zhao,A. Zhemchugov,B. Zheng,J. P. Zheng,W. J. Zheng,Y. H. Zheng,B. Zhong,L. Zhou,X. R. Zhou,X. K. Zhou,X. Y. Zhou,Kaixing Zhu,K. Zhu,S. H. Zhu,Xiaonian Zhu,Y. C. Zhu,Y. S. Zhu,Z. A. Zhu,J. Zhuang,L. Zotti,B. S. Zou,J. H. Zou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.95.072004

2017-01-01

Abstract:Using 106 $\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}1{0}^{6}$ $\ensuremath{\psi}(3686)$ events collected with the BESIII detector, we measure multipole amplitudes for the decay $\ensuremath{\psi}(3686)\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\gamma}{\ensuremath{\chi}}_{c1,2}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\gamma}\ensuremath{\gamma}J/\ensuremath{\psi}$ beyond the dominant electric-dipole amplitudes. The normalized magnetic-quadrupole (M2) amplitude for $\ensuremath{\psi}(3686)\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\gamma}{\ensuremath{\chi}}_{c1,2}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\gamma}\ensuremath{\gamma}J/\ensuremath{\psi}$ and the normalized electric-octupole amplitudes for $\ensuremath{\psi}(3686)\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\gamma}{\ensuremath{\chi}}_{c2}$, ${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{c2}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\gamma}J/\ensuremath{\psi}$ are determined. The M2 amplitudes for $\ensuremath{\psi}(3686)\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\gamma}{\ensuremath{\chi}}_{c1}$ and ${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{c1,2}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\gamma}J/\ensuremath{\psi}$ are found to differ significantly from zero and are consistent with theoretical predictions. We also obtain the ratios of M2 contributions of $\ensuremath{\psi}(3686)$ and $J/\ensuremath{\psi}$ decays to ${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{c1,2}$, ${b}_{2}^{1}/{b}_{2}^{2}=1.35\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.72$ and ${a}_{2}^{1}/{a}_{2}^{2}=0.617\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.083$, which agree well with theoretical expectations. By considering the multipole contributions of ${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{c1,2}$, we measure the product branching fractions for the cascade decays $\ensuremath{\psi}(3686)\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\gamma}{\ensuremath{\chi}}_{c0,1,2}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\gamma}\ensuremath{\gamma}J/\ensuremath{\psi}$ and search for the process ${\ensuremath{\eta}}_{c}(2S)\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\gamma}J/\ensuremath{\psi}$ through $\ensuremath{\psi}(3686)\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\gamma}{\ensuremath{\eta}}_{c}(2S)$. The product branching fraction for $\ensuremath{\psi}(3686)\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\gamma}{\ensuremath{\chi}}_{c0}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\gamma}\ensuremath{\gamma}J/\ensuremath{\psi}$ is $3\ensuremath{\sigma}$ larger than published measurements, while those of $\ensuremath{\psi}(3686)\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\gamma}{\ensuremath{\chi}}_{c1,2}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\gamma}\ensuremath{\gamma}J/\ensuremath{\psi}$ are consistent. No significant signal for the decay $\ensuremath{\psi}(3686)\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\gamma}{\ensuremath{\eta}}_{c}(2S)\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\gamma}\ensuremath{\gamma}J/\ensuremath{\psi}$ is observed, and the upper limit of the product branching fraction at the 90% confidence level is determined.