Supplementary Methods, Figures 1 - 7, Tables 1 - 10 from Evaluation of Midkine As a Diagnostic Serum Biomarker in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Weiliang Zhu,Jia-Jian Guo,Lei Guo,Jia Huang,Meifang Zhu,Jubo Zhang,Christopher A. Loffredo,Marshonna Forgues,Huang Hua,Xu-Jian Xing,Nanqi Ren,Qi Dong,Hang Zhou,Zhigang Ren,Ning Zhao,Xin Wei Wang,Zhao–You Tang,Lun–Xiu Qin,Qing–Hai Ye
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.22445489.v1
2023-01-01
Abstract:PDF file - 589K, Supplementary Fig. S1 Elevated MDK levels in the culture medium of HCC cell lines compared with normal liver cell lines. Supplementary Fig. S2 The prognostic values of AFP and MDK levels for HCC patients. Supplementary Fig. S3.Expression of serum MDK in another independent cohort (cohort B) from Egypt. Supplementary Fig. S4. Logistic Regression Model to combine information of MDK and AFP for prediction of HCC in the learning cohort A (n=252): Comparison of AUROC for diagnosis HCC through logist regression model I, serum MDK and AFP. Supplementary Fig. S5. Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for identifying HCC patients through serum MDK according to different prevalence. Supplementary Fig. S6. Correlation between serum AFP and MDK levels in HCC patients (n=252). Supplementary Fig. S7. Serum MDK is elevated in different HCC subsets, No significant difference in serum MDK levels was found between the learning cohort A and the external validation cohort of HCC patients(P=0.398), or between the early stage HCC patients in learning and validation cohort (P=0.295). Table S1. Relationship between MDK expression and clinicopathological features of HCC patients. Table S2. Clinical and biochemical characteristics of liver cirrhosis (LC) patients in cohort A. Table S3. Baseline characteristics of the hospital controls with different etiologies from learning Cohort A. Table S4. Clinical characteristics of HCC patients according to different cohorts in this study. Table S5. MDK protein levels in cancer-free cirrhotic liver and HCC tissues. Table S6. Comparison of AFP and MDK with clinicopathological parameters in learning cohort A. Table S7.Univariate Cox-regression Analyses of Factors Associated With OS and TTR. Table S8. Sensitivities and specificities of AFP and MDK according to various cutoff values. Table S9. Cross-validation of the diagnostic ability of serum MDK. Table S10. Comparison of MDK with clinicopathological parameters in validation cohort C.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?